Promoting reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking: A comparison of three approaches with fourth and fifth graders

Mengyi Li, P. Karen Murphy, Jianan Wang, Linda H. Mason, Carla Firetto, Liwei Wei, Kyung Sun Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comprehending and critically analyzing complex, content-rich text is an essential requirement of academic excellence as well as a life-long skill for students. Unfortunately, students often struggle to comprehend print and digital media, and subsequently, they are unable to complete essential tasks, such as identifying information, making inferences, examining arguments, or vetting sources. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of three reading interventions (i.e., Quality Talk (QT), Think before reading, think While reading, think After reading (TWA), and TWA/QT Hybrid) in promoting fourth- and fifth-grade students' reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking. Specifically, teachers in each intervention delivered the respective instructional mini-lessons in their language arts classes and conducted weekly text-based discussions. The results suggested that the Hybrid and QT interventions were effective at promoting high-level comprehension among fourth- and fifth-grade students. Evidence supported that students participating in the Hybrid and QT interventions engaged in more critical-analytic thinking during text-based discussions than those who received the TWA intervention, as evidenced by statistically significantly greater numbers of student-generated authentic questions and elaborated explanations. The Hybrid and QT interventions were also found to effectively boost students' oral reading fluency in both grades across two phases. Moreover, fifth-grade students who participated in the Hybrid intervention outperformed their peers from the TWA group on the post-discussion reading comprehension assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-115
Number of pages15
JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
Volume46
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
comprehension
Students
student
Language Arts
Peer Group
Thinking
print media
digital media
art
teacher
language
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • Classroom discussion
  • Critical-analytic thinking
  • Reading comprehension
  • School-based intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Promoting reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking : A comparison of three approaches with fourth and fifth graders. / Li, Mengyi; Murphy, P. Karen; Wang, Jianan; Mason, Linda H.; Firetto, Carla; Wei, Liwei; Chung, Kyung Sun.

In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 46, 01.07.2016, p. 101-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Mengyi ; Murphy, P. Karen ; Wang, Jianan ; Mason, Linda H. ; Firetto, Carla ; Wei, Liwei ; Chung, Kyung Sun. / Promoting reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking : A comparison of three approaches with fourth and fifth graders. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 46. pp. 101-115.
@article{9b6168d5ef214a48a1bfc755f43ad7a3,
title = "Promoting reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking: A comparison of three approaches with fourth and fifth graders",
abstract = "Comprehending and critically analyzing complex, content-rich text is an essential requirement of academic excellence as well as a life-long skill for students. Unfortunately, students often struggle to comprehend print and digital media, and subsequently, they are unable to complete essential tasks, such as identifying information, making inferences, examining arguments, or vetting sources. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of three reading interventions (i.e., Quality Talk (QT), Think before reading, think While reading, think After reading (TWA), and TWA/QT Hybrid) in promoting fourth- and fifth-grade students' reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking. Specifically, teachers in each intervention delivered the respective instructional mini-lessons in their language arts classes and conducted weekly text-based discussions. The results suggested that the Hybrid and QT interventions were effective at promoting high-level comprehension among fourth- and fifth-grade students. Evidence supported that students participating in the Hybrid and QT interventions engaged in more critical-analytic thinking during text-based discussions than those who received the TWA intervention, as evidenced by statistically significantly greater numbers of student-generated authentic questions and elaborated explanations. The Hybrid and QT interventions were also found to effectively boost students' oral reading fluency in both grades across two phases. Moreover, fifth-grade students who participated in the Hybrid intervention outperformed their peers from the TWA group on the post-discussion reading comprehension assessments.",
keywords = "Classroom discussion, Critical-analytic thinking, Reading comprehension, School-based intervention",
author = "Mengyi Li and Murphy, {P. Karen} and Jianan Wang and Mason, {Linda H.} and Carla Firetto and Liwei Wei and Chung, {Kyung Sun}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "101--115",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Psychology",
issn = "0361-476X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking

T2 - A comparison of three approaches with fourth and fifth graders

AU - Li, Mengyi

AU - Murphy, P. Karen

AU - Wang, Jianan

AU - Mason, Linda H.

AU - Firetto, Carla

AU - Wei, Liwei

AU - Chung, Kyung Sun

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Comprehending and critically analyzing complex, content-rich text is an essential requirement of academic excellence as well as a life-long skill for students. Unfortunately, students often struggle to comprehend print and digital media, and subsequently, they are unable to complete essential tasks, such as identifying information, making inferences, examining arguments, or vetting sources. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of three reading interventions (i.e., Quality Talk (QT), Think before reading, think While reading, think After reading (TWA), and TWA/QT Hybrid) in promoting fourth- and fifth-grade students' reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking. Specifically, teachers in each intervention delivered the respective instructional mini-lessons in their language arts classes and conducted weekly text-based discussions. The results suggested that the Hybrid and QT interventions were effective at promoting high-level comprehension among fourth- and fifth-grade students. Evidence supported that students participating in the Hybrid and QT interventions engaged in more critical-analytic thinking during text-based discussions than those who received the TWA intervention, as evidenced by statistically significantly greater numbers of student-generated authentic questions and elaborated explanations. The Hybrid and QT interventions were also found to effectively boost students' oral reading fluency in both grades across two phases. Moreover, fifth-grade students who participated in the Hybrid intervention outperformed their peers from the TWA group on the post-discussion reading comprehension assessments.

AB - Comprehending and critically analyzing complex, content-rich text is an essential requirement of academic excellence as well as a life-long skill for students. Unfortunately, students often struggle to comprehend print and digital media, and subsequently, they are unable to complete essential tasks, such as identifying information, making inferences, examining arguments, or vetting sources. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of three reading interventions (i.e., Quality Talk (QT), Think before reading, think While reading, think After reading (TWA), and TWA/QT Hybrid) in promoting fourth- and fifth-grade students' reading comprehension and critical-analytic thinking. Specifically, teachers in each intervention delivered the respective instructional mini-lessons in their language arts classes and conducted weekly text-based discussions. The results suggested that the Hybrid and QT interventions were effective at promoting high-level comprehension among fourth- and fifth-grade students. Evidence supported that students participating in the Hybrid and QT interventions engaged in more critical-analytic thinking during text-based discussions than those who received the TWA intervention, as evidenced by statistically significantly greater numbers of student-generated authentic questions and elaborated explanations. The Hybrid and QT interventions were also found to effectively boost students' oral reading fluency in both grades across two phases. Moreover, fifth-grade students who participated in the Hybrid intervention outperformed their peers from the TWA group on the post-discussion reading comprehension assessments.

KW - Classroom discussion

KW - Critical-analytic thinking

KW - Reading comprehension

KW - School-based intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977508355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977508355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977508355

VL - 46

SP - 101

EP - 115

JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology

JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology

SN - 0361-476X

ER -