Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering

Marla Parker, Eric Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the factors associated with holding leadership positions among men and women academic scientists. We develop hypotheses for three determinants of leadership: professional networks, science ability, and gender. We test the resulting model on the likelihood of holding three different types of academic science leadership-research center leadership, university administrative leadership, and discipline leadership. Findings show that while science productivity and reputation are strongly associated with having either a center or discipline leadership position, they are less strongly associated with administrative leadership. Also, larger and more dense collaboration networks predict having a center leadership position, but the opposite is true for holding an administrative leadership position. Women are more likely to be in discipline leadership positions and less likely to be a leader of a research center or have an administrative university leadership position. Finally, having more women in the network reduces the likelihood of holding discipline or center leadership positions. Interpretations of findings and conclusions explore the potential implications for theory, practice and policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-348
Number of pages17
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
leadership
determinants
engineering
gender
ability
science
university
theory-practice
Research
reputation

Keywords

  • Academic science
  • Gender and social networks
  • Leadership
  • Productivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering. / Parker, Marla; Welch, Eric.

In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 332-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0d21d41184fa45708898fe5a1f87cebe,
title = "Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering",
abstract = "This paper examines the factors associated with holding leadership positions among men and women academic scientists. We develop hypotheses for three determinants of leadership: professional networks, science ability, and gender. We test the resulting model on the likelihood of holding three different types of academic science leadership-research center leadership, university administrative leadership, and discipline leadership. Findings show that while science productivity and reputation are strongly associated with having either a center or discipline leadership position, they are less strongly associated with administrative leadership. Also, larger and more dense collaboration networks predict having a center leadership position, but the opposite is true for holding an administrative leadership position. Women are more likely to be in discipline leadership positions and less likely to be a leader of a research center or have an administrative university leadership position. Finally, having more women in the network reduces the likelihood of holding discipline or center leadership positions. Interpretations of findings and conclusions explore the potential implications for theory, practice and policy.",
keywords = "Academic science, Gender and social networks, Leadership, Productivity",
author = "Marla Parker and Eric Welch",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "332--348",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering

AU - Parker, Marla

AU - Welch, Eric

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - This paper examines the factors associated with holding leadership positions among men and women academic scientists. We develop hypotheses for three determinants of leadership: professional networks, science ability, and gender. We test the resulting model on the likelihood of holding three different types of academic science leadership-research center leadership, university administrative leadership, and discipline leadership. Findings show that while science productivity and reputation are strongly associated with having either a center or discipline leadership position, they are less strongly associated with administrative leadership. Also, larger and more dense collaboration networks predict having a center leadership position, but the opposite is true for holding an administrative leadership position. Women are more likely to be in discipline leadership positions and less likely to be a leader of a research center or have an administrative university leadership position. Finally, having more women in the network reduces the likelihood of holding discipline or center leadership positions. Interpretations of findings and conclusions explore the potential implications for theory, practice and policy.

AB - This paper examines the factors associated with holding leadership positions among men and women academic scientists. We develop hypotheses for three determinants of leadership: professional networks, science ability, and gender. We test the resulting model on the likelihood of holding three different types of academic science leadership-research center leadership, university administrative leadership, and discipline leadership. Findings show that while science productivity and reputation are strongly associated with having either a center or discipline leadership position, they are less strongly associated with administrative leadership. Also, larger and more dense collaboration networks predict having a center leadership position, but the opposite is true for holding an administrative leadership position. Women are more likely to be in discipline leadership positions and less likely to be a leader of a research center or have an administrative university leadership position. Finally, having more women in the network reduces the likelihood of holding discipline or center leadership positions. Interpretations of findings and conclusions explore the potential implications for theory, practice and policy.

KW - Academic science

KW - Gender and social networks

KW - Leadership

KW - Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875113889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875113889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.001

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84875113889

VL - 24

SP - 332

EP - 348

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 2

ER -