Producing actionable science in conservation: Best practices for organizations and individuals

Leah R. Gerber, Chris J. Barton, Samantha H. Cheng, Derrick Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many researchers working in conservation aspire to produce “actionable science” to inform conservation practice. In order to understand what it takes to produce actionable science, we interviewed 71 researchers who have worked on producing actionable science in conservation. We asked about the attributes of actionable science and the various factors that, in their experience, aid or hinder its production. We focused specifically on factors that correspond to individual behaviors and those that relate to organizational level policies and practices. Six best practices associated with the production of actionable science emerged from our interviews: four at the individual level and two at the organizational level. Best practices for individual behaviors include: (a) engaging in collaboration; (b) practicing empathy; (c) building trusting relationships; and (d) employing diverse communication methods. Best practices for organizations include: (a) incentivizing actionable science and (b) providing resources for actionable science to early-career researchers. Our analyses provide useful guidelines for conservation researchers and practitioners who are interested in producing actionable science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere295
JournalConservation Science and Practice
Volume2
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Producing actionable science in conservation: Best practices for organizations and individuals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this