Problematizing mirativity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are many excellent descriptions of mirativity in various language grammars, and more recently there has been a flurry of research refining mirativity to include how languages linguistically realize surprise and related concepts such as ‘unexpectedness’ and ‘new information’. However, there is currently no commonly accepted set of independently motivated diagnostics for testing mirativity that utilizes the best practices and first principles of semantic and pragmatic investigation. As such, the goal of this paper is to go back to basics and examine mirativity from the point of view of a field linguist who has been given the task of discovering and documenting how a speaker of a language linguistically expresses her surprise. This approach rests on two premises: first, mirativity is about surprise in the psychological sense. The second premise is that we take seriously that mirativity involves a kind of meaning, and that all languages have the linguistic resources for communicating mirative (surprise) meaning. The outcome is a set of tests that can be used to probe mirative meanings in any language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-342
Number of pages31
JournalReview of Cognitive Linguistics
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Language
language
Linguistics
Practice Guidelines
Semantics
best practice
grammar
diagnostic
pragmatics
semantics
Mirativity
Psychology
linguistics
Research
Surprise
resources

Keywords

  • Entailment
  • Gitksan
  • Implicature
  • Pragmatic fieldwork
  • Semantic
  • Surprise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Problematizing mirativity. / Peterson, Tyler.

In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 312-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ca2575f8e6724534a07be091da8732ce,
title = "Problematizing mirativity",
abstract = "There are many excellent descriptions of mirativity in various language grammars, and more recently there has been a flurry of research refining mirativity to include how languages linguistically realize surprise and related concepts such as ‘unexpectedness’ and ‘new information’. However, there is currently no commonly accepted set of independently motivated diagnostics for testing mirativity that utilizes the best practices and first principles of semantic and pragmatic investigation. As such, the goal of this paper is to go back to basics and examine mirativity from the point of view of a field linguist who has been given the task of discovering and documenting how a speaker of a language linguistically expresses her surprise. This approach rests on two premises: first, mirativity is about surprise in the psychological sense. The second premise is that we take seriously that mirativity involves a kind of meaning, and that all languages have the linguistic resources for communicating mirative (surprise) meaning. The outcome is a set of tests that can be used to probe mirative meanings in any language.",
keywords = "Entailment, Gitksan, Implicature, Pragmatic fieldwork, Semantic, Surprise",
author = "Tyler Peterson",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/rcl.15.2.02pet",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "312--342",
journal = "Review of Cognitive Linguistics",
issn = "1877-9751",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problematizing mirativity

AU - Peterson, Tyler

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - There are many excellent descriptions of mirativity in various language grammars, and more recently there has been a flurry of research refining mirativity to include how languages linguistically realize surprise and related concepts such as ‘unexpectedness’ and ‘new information’. However, there is currently no commonly accepted set of independently motivated diagnostics for testing mirativity that utilizes the best practices and first principles of semantic and pragmatic investigation. As such, the goal of this paper is to go back to basics and examine mirativity from the point of view of a field linguist who has been given the task of discovering and documenting how a speaker of a language linguistically expresses her surprise. This approach rests on two premises: first, mirativity is about surprise in the psychological sense. The second premise is that we take seriously that mirativity involves a kind of meaning, and that all languages have the linguistic resources for communicating mirative (surprise) meaning. The outcome is a set of tests that can be used to probe mirative meanings in any language.

AB - There are many excellent descriptions of mirativity in various language grammars, and more recently there has been a flurry of research refining mirativity to include how languages linguistically realize surprise and related concepts such as ‘unexpectedness’ and ‘new information’. However, there is currently no commonly accepted set of independently motivated diagnostics for testing mirativity that utilizes the best practices and first principles of semantic and pragmatic investigation. As such, the goal of this paper is to go back to basics and examine mirativity from the point of view of a field linguist who has been given the task of discovering and documenting how a speaker of a language linguistically expresses her surprise. This approach rests on two premises: first, mirativity is about surprise in the psychological sense. The second premise is that we take seriously that mirativity involves a kind of meaning, and that all languages have the linguistic resources for communicating mirative (surprise) meaning. The outcome is a set of tests that can be used to probe mirative meanings in any language.

KW - Entailment

KW - Gitksan

KW - Implicature

KW - Pragmatic fieldwork

KW - Semantic

KW - Surprise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038390867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038390867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/rcl.15.2.02pet

DO - 10.1075/rcl.15.2.02pet

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038390867

VL - 15

SP - 312

EP - 342

JO - Review of Cognitive Linguistics

JF - Review of Cognitive Linguistics

SN - 1877-9751

IS - 2

ER -