Problem Solving in the Clinical Interview: A Cognitive Analysis of the Performance of Physicians, Residents, and Studentsmx

David Kaufman, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluates differences between subjects at three levels of expertise in acquiring and using information obtained from a patient during the clinical interview. Endocrinologists, residents, and medical students interviewed a volunteer endocrine outpatient and provided differential diagnoses. The transcribed doctor-patient dialogues were analyzed using cognitive methods of analysis. The methods are based on a cognitive framework for studying doctor-patient interaction. The primary focus was on two units of knowledge acquisition: observations and findings. Observations are information units acquired from the patient's reports. Findings are more abstract units composed of clinically significant observations. Several variables based on these knowledge units were identified. Differences were found between groups in the accuracy of diagnoses and in the differential acquisition of information from the patient during the interview. These differences were manifested most clearly in terms of a series of efficiency measures designed to characterize the selective use of information in solving the problem. The endocrinologists elicited findings with significantly greater efficiency than the other two groups and used these findings to correctly diagnose the clinical case. In addition, several of the measures were significantly correlated with diagnostic accuracy. The implications for the assessment of clinical competency are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-14
Number of pages9
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

physician
Interviews
resident
Physicians
interview
performance
Differential Diagnosis
efficiency
knowledge acquisition
Efficiency
Clinical Competence
medical student
diagnostic
expertise
Medical Students
Group
dialogue
Volunteers
Outpatients
interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Problem Solving in the Clinical Interview : A Cognitive Analysis of the Performance of Physicians, Residents, and Studentsmx. / Kaufman, David; Patel, Vimla.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 6-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f95d82165fe744e48c5868a7cfc4e3b8,
title = "Problem Solving in the Clinical Interview: A Cognitive Analysis of the Performance of Physicians, Residents, and Studentsmx",
abstract = "This study evaluates differences between subjects at three levels of expertise in acquiring and using information obtained from a patient during the clinical interview. Endocrinologists, residents, and medical students interviewed a volunteer endocrine outpatient and provided differential diagnoses. The transcribed doctor-patient dialogues were analyzed using cognitive methods of analysis. The methods are based on a cognitive framework for studying doctor-patient interaction. The primary focus was on two units of knowledge acquisition: observations and findings. Observations are information units acquired from the patient's reports. Findings are more abstract units composed of clinically significant observations. Several variables based on these knowledge units were identified. Differences were found between groups in the accuracy of diagnoses and in the differential acquisition of information from the patient during the interview. These differences were manifested most clearly in terms of a series of efficiency measures designed to characterize the selective use of information in solving the problem. The endocrinologists elicited findings with significantly greater efficiency than the other two groups and used these findings to correctly diagnose the clinical case. In addition, several of the measures were significantly correlated with diagnostic accuracy. The implications for the assessment of clinical competency are discussed.",
author = "David Kaufman and Vimla Patel",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10401339109539473",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "6--14",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problem Solving in the Clinical Interview

T2 - A Cognitive Analysis of the Performance of Physicians, Residents, and Studentsmx

AU - Kaufman, David

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - This study evaluates differences between subjects at three levels of expertise in acquiring and using information obtained from a patient during the clinical interview. Endocrinologists, residents, and medical students interviewed a volunteer endocrine outpatient and provided differential diagnoses. The transcribed doctor-patient dialogues were analyzed using cognitive methods of analysis. The methods are based on a cognitive framework for studying doctor-patient interaction. The primary focus was on two units of knowledge acquisition: observations and findings. Observations are information units acquired from the patient's reports. Findings are more abstract units composed of clinically significant observations. Several variables based on these knowledge units were identified. Differences were found between groups in the accuracy of diagnoses and in the differential acquisition of information from the patient during the interview. These differences were manifested most clearly in terms of a series of efficiency measures designed to characterize the selective use of information in solving the problem. The endocrinologists elicited findings with significantly greater efficiency than the other two groups and used these findings to correctly diagnose the clinical case. In addition, several of the measures were significantly correlated with diagnostic accuracy. The implications for the assessment of clinical competency are discussed.

AB - This study evaluates differences between subjects at three levels of expertise in acquiring and using information obtained from a patient during the clinical interview. Endocrinologists, residents, and medical students interviewed a volunteer endocrine outpatient and provided differential diagnoses. The transcribed doctor-patient dialogues were analyzed using cognitive methods of analysis. The methods are based on a cognitive framework for studying doctor-patient interaction. The primary focus was on two units of knowledge acquisition: observations and findings. Observations are information units acquired from the patient's reports. Findings are more abstract units composed of clinically significant observations. Several variables based on these knowledge units were identified. Differences were found between groups in the accuracy of diagnoses and in the differential acquisition of information from the patient during the interview. These differences were manifested most clearly in terms of a series of efficiency measures designed to characterize the selective use of information in solving the problem. The endocrinologists elicited findings with significantly greater efficiency than the other two groups and used these findings to correctly diagnose the clinical case. In addition, several of the measures were significantly correlated with diagnostic accuracy. The implications for the assessment of clinical competency are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007330927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007330927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10401339109539473

DO - 10.1080/10401339109539473

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007330927

VL - 3

SP - 6

EP - 14

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 1

ER -