Probation revocation: A proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage

Celesta A. Albonetti, John R. Hepburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most studies find that offender's age, gender, ethnicity, prior arrest record, severity of the current offense and level of supervision significantly influence time to probation failure. There is little evidence to show that treatment interventions significantly affect either the likelihood of failure or the time to failure. We propose that an offender's prior record and lower education level - indicators of social disadvantage - directly affect the mean time to a probation revocation. Further, we suggest that social disadvantage may condition the effects of other offender characteristics, incident offense characteristics, and treatment intervention on failure time. Using a proportional hazards model of probation revocation, we find that intervention increases the risk of failure, as well as partial support for our hypothesis of the conditioning effect of offender's social disadvantage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-138
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Problems
Volume44
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

probation
conditioning
offender
offense
supervision
incident
ethnicity
time
gender
evidence
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Probation revocation : A proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage. / Albonetti, Celesta A.; Hepburn, John R.

In: Social Problems, Vol. 44, No. 1, 02.1997, p. 124-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5902bf2003e542499e9edc1e3e08665e,
title = "Probation revocation: A proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage",
abstract = "Most studies find that offender's age, gender, ethnicity, prior arrest record, severity of the current offense and level of supervision significantly influence time to probation failure. There is little evidence to show that treatment interventions significantly affect either the likelihood of failure or the time to failure. We propose that an offender's prior record and lower education level - indicators of social disadvantage - directly affect the mean time to a probation revocation. Further, we suggest that social disadvantage may condition the effects of other offender characteristics, incident offense characteristics, and treatment intervention on failure time. Using a proportional hazards model of probation revocation, we find that intervention increases the risk of failure, as well as partial support for our hypothesis of the conditioning effect of offender's social disadvantage.",
author = "Albonetti, {Celesta A.} and Hepburn, {John R.}",
year = "1997",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "124--138",
journal = "Social Problems",
issn = "0037-7791",
publisher = "University of California Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probation revocation

T2 - A proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage

AU - Albonetti, Celesta A.

AU - Hepburn, John R.

PY - 1997/2

Y1 - 1997/2

N2 - Most studies find that offender's age, gender, ethnicity, prior arrest record, severity of the current offense and level of supervision significantly influence time to probation failure. There is little evidence to show that treatment interventions significantly affect either the likelihood of failure or the time to failure. We propose that an offender's prior record and lower education level - indicators of social disadvantage - directly affect the mean time to a probation revocation. Further, we suggest that social disadvantage may condition the effects of other offender characteristics, incident offense characteristics, and treatment intervention on failure time. Using a proportional hazards model of probation revocation, we find that intervention increases the risk of failure, as well as partial support for our hypothesis of the conditioning effect of offender's social disadvantage.

AB - Most studies find that offender's age, gender, ethnicity, prior arrest record, severity of the current offense and level of supervision significantly influence time to probation failure. There is little evidence to show that treatment interventions significantly affect either the likelihood of failure or the time to failure. We propose that an offender's prior record and lower education level - indicators of social disadvantage - directly affect the mean time to a probation revocation. Further, we suggest that social disadvantage may condition the effects of other offender characteristics, incident offense characteristics, and treatment intervention on failure time. Using a proportional hazards model of probation revocation, we find that intervention increases the risk of failure, as well as partial support for our hypothesis of the conditioning effect of offender's social disadvantage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0039415288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0039415288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0039415288

VL - 44

SP - 124

EP - 138

JO - Social Problems

JF - Social Problems

SN - 0037-7791

IS - 1

ER -