Probable malingering and performance on the continuous visual memory test

George K. Henry, Craig Enders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A known groups design involving 54 personal injury litigants, and disability claimants was employed to investigate group differences on the Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT). Group status was determined by performance on symptom validity testing and application of the Slick et al., 1999 diagnostic criteria for probable Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction (MND). Twenty-seven subjects who met the Slick et al., 1999 criteria formed the Probable Malingering (PM) group, while 27 subjects who did not comprised the Not Malingering (NM) group. Subjects in the PM group performed significantly worse on all CVMT variables (Hits, False Alarm Errors, Total Score, and Delayed Recall) relative to subjects in the NM group. Cutscores for the CVMT variables were empirically derived via logistic regression analyses. False Alarm Errors ≥ 21 Total Score ≤ 72 and Delayed Recall ≤ 3 were associated with good classification accuracy (70-74%), and specificity (85-93%). A CVMT Total Score ≤ 69, False Alarm Errors ≥ 22, and Delayed Recall ≤ 2 were all associated with 100% positive predictive power. The CVMT may be a valuable adjunct to the neuropsychological test battery for evaluating effort of personal injury litigants and disability claimants undergoing forensic neuropsychological evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Neuropsychology
Volume14
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Malingering
Neuropsychological Tests
Wounds and Injuries
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • CVMT
  • Probable malingering
  • Symptom validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Probable malingering and performance on the continuous visual memory test. / Henry, George K.; Enders, Craig.

In: Applied Neuropsychology, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2007, p. 267-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, George K. ; Enders, Craig. / Probable malingering and performance on the continuous visual memory test. In: Applied Neuropsychology. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 267-274.
@article{f38eb5caf6f54246af160e9654ab8b54,
title = "Probable malingering and performance on the continuous visual memory test",
abstract = "A known groups design involving 54 personal injury litigants, and disability claimants was employed to investigate group differences on the Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT). Group status was determined by performance on symptom validity testing and application of the Slick et al., 1999 diagnostic criteria for probable Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction (MND). Twenty-seven subjects who met the Slick et al., 1999 criteria formed the Probable Malingering (PM) group, while 27 subjects who did not comprised the Not Malingering (NM) group. Subjects in the PM group performed significantly worse on all CVMT variables (Hits, False Alarm Errors, Total Score, and Delayed Recall) relative to subjects in the NM group. Cutscores for the CVMT variables were empirically derived via logistic regression analyses. False Alarm Errors ≥ 21 Total Score ≤ 72 and Delayed Recall ≤ 3 were associated with good classification accuracy (70-74{\%}), and specificity (85-93{\%}). A CVMT Total Score ≤ 69, False Alarm Errors ≥ 22, and Delayed Recall ≤ 2 were all associated with 100{\%} positive predictive power. The CVMT may be a valuable adjunct to the neuropsychological test battery for evaluating effort of personal injury litigants and disability claimants undergoing forensic neuropsychological evaluations.",
keywords = "CVMT, Probable malingering, Symptom validity",
author = "Henry, {George K.} and Craig Enders",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "267--274",
journal = "Applied neuropsychology. Adult",
issn = "2327-9095",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probable malingering and performance on the continuous visual memory test

AU - Henry, George K.

AU - Enders, Craig

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - A known groups design involving 54 personal injury litigants, and disability claimants was employed to investigate group differences on the Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT). Group status was determined by performance on symptom validity testing and application of the Slick et al., 1999 diagnostic criteria for probable Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction (MND). Twenty-seven subjects who met the Slick et al., 1999 criteria formed the Probable Malingering (PM) group, while 27 subjects who did not comprised the Not Malingering (NM) group. Subjects in the PM group performed significantly worse on all CVMT variables (Hits, False Alarm Errors, Total Score, and Delayed Recall) relative to subjects in the NM group. Cutscores for the CVMT variables were empirically derived via logistic regression analyses. False Alarm Errors ≥ 21 Total Score ≤ 72 and Delayed Recall ≤ 3 were associated with good classification accuracy (70-74%), and specificity (85-93%). A CVMT Total Score ≤ 69, False Alarm Errors ≥ 22, and Delayed Recall ≤ 2 were all associated with 100% positive predictive power. The CVMT may be a valuable adjunct to the neuropsychological test battery for evaluating effort of personal injury litigants and disability claimants undergoing forensic neuropsychological evaluations.

AB - A known groups design involving 54 personal injury litigants, and disability claimants was employed to investigate group differences on the Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT). Group status was determined by performance on symptom validity testing and application of the Slick et al., 1999 diagnostic criteria for probable Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction (MND). Twenty-seven subjects who met the Slick et al., 1999 criteria formed the Probable Malingering (PM) group, while 27 subjects who did not comprised the Not Malingering (NM) group. Subjects in the PM group performed significantly worse on all CVMT variables (Hits, False Alarm Errors, Total Score, and Delayed Recall) relative to subjects in the NM group. Cutscores for the CVMT variables were empirically derived via logistic regression analyses. False Alarm Errors ≥ 21 Total Score ≤ 72 and Delayed Recall ≤ 3 were associated with good classification accuracy (70-74%), and specificity (85-93%). A CVMT Total Score ≤ 69, False Alarm Errors ≥ 22, and Delayed Recall ≤ 2 were all associated with 100% positive predictive power. The CVMT may be a valuable adjunct to the neuropsychological test battery for evaluating effort of personal injury litigants and disability claimants undergoing forensic neuropsychological evaluations.

KW - CVMT

KW - Probable malingering

KW - Symptom validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149116403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149116403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 267

EP - 274

JO - Applied neuropsychology. Adult

JF - Applied neuropsychology. Adult

SN - 2327-9095

IS - 4

ER -