Privatized corrections in the 21st century: Reframing the privatization debate

Andrea N. Montes, Daniel P. Mears

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research Summary: Governments historically have relied on private organizations to assist with the provision of correctional punishment and services. This reliance continues but has engendered considerable debate that stems from ideological divides. Debate stems as well from a disjuncture between the limited evidence about privatization and calls for evidence-based policy. In this article, we present a conceptual framework for identifying what is and is not known about privatization and for guiding scholarship and policy. We then discuss key issues that must be addressed to advance knowledge about privatization and productively inform policy debates. Policy Implications: In our review, we highlight that little is known not only about the benefits and harms of private corrections but also about the operations, impacts, and cost efficiency of public corrections. Scholarship on privatization can be used to shed light on contemporary punishment practices and how they impact individuals and influence corrections systems and society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-239
Number of pages23
JournalCriminology and Public Policy
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

privatization
penalty
evidence
efficiency
costs

Keywords

  • corrections
  • evidence
  • policy
  • private prisons
  • privatization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Administration
  • Law

Cite this

Privatized corrections in the 21st century : Reframing the privatization debate. / Montes, Andrea N.; Mears, Daniel P.

In: Criminology and Public Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 05.2019, p. 217-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{014203c149cd4af0b7d32ea8627c668b,
title = "Privatized corrections in the 21st century: Reframing the privatization debate",
abstract = "Research Summary: Governments historically have relied on private organizations to assist with the provision of correctional punishment and services. This reliance continues but has engendered considerable debate that stems from ideological divides. Debate stems as well from a disjuncture between the limited evidence about privatization and calls for evidence-based policy. In this article, we present a conceptual framework for identifying what is and is not known about privatization and for guiding scholarship and policy. We then discuss key issues that must be addressed to advance knowledge about privatization and productively inform policy debates. Policy Implications: In our review, we highlight that little is known not only about the benefits and harms of private corrections but also about the operations, impacts, and cost efficiency of public corrections. Scholarship on privatization can be used to shed light on contemporary punishment practices and how they impact individuals and influence corrections systems and society.",
keywords = "corrections, evidence, policy, private prisons, privatization",
author = "Montes, {Andrea N.} and Mears, {Daniel P.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/1745-9133.12444",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "217--239",
journal = "Criminology & Public Policy",
issn = "1538-6473",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privatized corrections in the 21st century

T2 - Reframing the privatization debate

AU - Montes, Andrea N.

AU - Mears, Daniel P.

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Research Summary: Governments historically have relied on private organizations to assist with the provision of correctional punishment and services. This reliance continues but has engendered considerable debate that stems from ideological divides. Debate stems as well from a disjuncture between the limited evidence about privatization and calls for evidence-based policy. In this article, we present a conceptual framework for identifying what is and is not known about privatization and for guiding scholarship and policy. We then discuss key issues that must be addressed to advance knowledge about privatization and productively inform policy debates. Policy Implications: In our review, we highlight that little is known not only about the benefits and harms of private corrections but also about the operations, impacts, and cost efficiency of public corrections. Scholarship on privatization can be used to shed light on contemporary punishment practices and how they impact individuals and influence corrections systems and society.

AB - Research Summary: Governments historically have relied on private organizations to assist with the provision of correctional punishment and services. This reliance continues but has engendered considerable debate that stems from ideological divides. Debate stems as well from a disjuncture between the limited evidence about privatization and calls for evidence-based policy. In this article, we present a conceptual framework for identifying what is and is not known about privatization and for guiding scholarship and policy. We then discuss key issues that must be addressed to advance knowledge about privatization and productively inform policy debates. Policy Implications: In our review, we highlight that little is known not only about the benefits and harms of private corrections but also about the operations, impacts, and cost efficiency of public corrections. Scholarship on privatization can be used to shed light on contemporary punishment practices and how they impact individuals and influence corrections systems and society.

KW - corrections

KW - evidence

KW - policy

KW - private prisons

KW - privatization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065714373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065714373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9133.12444

DO - 10.1111/1745-9133.12444

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065714373

VL - 18

SP - 217

EP - 239

JO - Criminology & Public Policy

JF - Criminology & Public Policy

SN - 1538-6473

IS - 2

ER -