Prioritization of stockpile maintenance with layered Pareto fronts

Sarah E. Burke, Christine M. Anderson-Cook, Lu Lu, Douglas Montgomery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Difficult choices are required for a decision-making process where resources and budgets are increasingly constrained. This article demonstrates a structured decision-making approach using layered Pareto fronts to identify priorities about how to allocate funds between munitions stockpiles based on their estimated reliability, the urgency of needing available units, and the consequences if adequate numbers of units are not available. This case study, while specific to the characteristics of a group of munitions stockpiles, illustrates the general process of structured decision-making based on first identifying appropriate metrics that summarize the important dimensions of the decision, and then objectively eliminating non-contenders from further consideration. The final subjective stage incorporates user priorities to select the four stockpiles to receive additional maintenance and surveillance funds based on understanding the trade-offs and robustness to various user priorities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalQuality Engineering
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 25 2017

Fingerprint

Decision making

Keywords

  • decision-making
  • DMRCS
  • multiple criteria
  • Pareto front
  • reliability
  • statistical engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Prioritization of stockpile maintenance with layered Pareto fronts. / Burke, Sarah E.; Anderson-Cook, Christine M.; Lu, Lu; Montgomery, Douglas.

In: Quality Engineering, 25.10.2017, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burke, Sarah E. ; Anderson-Cook, Christine M. ; Lu, Lu ; Montgomery, Douglas. / Prioritization of stockpile maintenance with layered Pareto fronts. In: Quality Engineering. 2017 ; pp. 1-13.
@article{5edcbc0f6a9c4c5197a27d5cecc2db23,
title = "Prioritization of stockpile maintenance with layered Pareto fronts",
abstract = "Difficult choices are required for a decision-making process where resources and budgets are increasingly constrained. This article demonstrates a structured decision-making approach using layered Pareto fronts to identify priorities about how to allocate funds between munitions stockpiles based on their estimated reliability, the urgency of needing available units, and the consequences if adequate numbers of units are not available. This case study, while specific to the characteristics of a group of munitions stockpiles, illustrates the general process of structured decision-making based on first identifying appropriate metrics that summarize the important dimensions of the decision, and then objectively eliminating non-contenders from further consideration. The final subjective stage incorporates user priorities to select the four stockpiles to receive additional maintenance and surveillance funds based on understanding the trade-offs and robustness to various user priorities.",
keywords = "decision-making, DMRCS, multiple criteria, Pareto front, reliability, statistical engineering",
author = "Burke, {Sarah E.} and Anderson-Cook, {Christine M.} and Lu Lu and Douglas Montgomery",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/08982112.2017.1390585",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Quality Engineering",
issn = "0898-2112",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prioritization of stockpile maintenance with layered Pareto fronts

AU - Burke, Sarah E.

AU - Anderson-Cook, Christine M.

AU - Lu, Lu

AU - Montgomery, Douglas

PY - 2017/10/25

Y1 - 2017/10/25

N2 - Difficult choices are required for a decision-making process where resources and budgets are increasingly constrained. This article demonstrates a structured decision-making approach using layered Pareto fronts to identify priorities about how to allocate funds between munitions stockpiles based on their estimated reliability, the urgency of needing available units, and the consequences if adequate numbers of units are not available. This case study, while specific to the characteristics of a group of munitions stockpiles, illustrates the general process of structured decision-making based on first identifying appropriate metrics that summarize the important dimensions of the decision, and then objectively eliminating non-contenders from further consideration. The final subjective stage incorporates user priorities to select the four stockpiles to receive additional maintenance and surveillance funds based on understanding the trade-offs and robustness to various user priorities.

AB - Difficult choices are required for a decision-making process where resources and budgets are increasingly constrained. This article demonstrates a structured decision-making approach using layered Pareto fronts to identify priorities about how to allocate funds between munitions stockpiles based on their estimated reliability, the urgency of needing available units, and the consequences if adequate numbers of units are not available. This case study, while specific to the characteristics of a group of munitions stockpiles, illustrates the general process of structured decision-making based on first identifying appropriate metrics that summarize the important dimensions of the decision, and then objectively eliminating non-contenders from further consideration. The final subjective stage incorporates user priorities to select the four stockpiles to receive additional maintenance and surveillance funds based on understanding the trade-offs and robustness to various user priorities.

KW - decision-making

KW - DMRCS

KW - multiple criteria

KW - Pareto front

KW - reliability

KW - statistical engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038019263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038019263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08982112.2017.1390585

DO - 10.1080/08982112.2017.1390585

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Quality Engineering

JF - Quality Engineering

SN - 0898-2112

ER -