Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems

Michael Schoon, Martin D. Robards, Chanda L. Meek, Victor Galaz

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Polycentricity is a governance system in which there are multiple interacting governing bodies with autonomy to make and enforce rules within a specific policy arena and geography. These governance authorities interact with others at similar scales horizontally and within nested scales vertically. Multiple governance units have been suggested to provide many institutional sources for enhancing resilience and create a mechanism enabling other resilience-enhancing factors. In theory, and in empirical cases, they have been found to create a foundation for learning and experimentation, to be a source of policy/institutional diversity, to enable broader levels of participation and to improve connectivity between groups while building in modularity and redundancy. Recent work has started to explore variance in polycentricity - notably, levels of structural inclusiveness (narrowly to more broadly representative) and degree of collaboration (type of collaborative activity). We see a need to learn more about how inclusiveness and degree interact and how they lead to divergent outcomes in different situations, and also when polycentricity succeeds and fails, and to what extent. Studies to date in complex systems have been largely diagnostic and lacked predictive power and precision. In short, there is a lack of understanding of how to operationalize the idea of polycentricity in governance of social-ecological systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPrinciples for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages226-250
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)9781316014240, 9781107082656
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

autonomy
connectivity
learning
policy
geography
participation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Schoon, M., Robards, M. D., Meek, C. L., & Galaz, V. (2015). Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems. In Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems (pp. 226-250). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.010

Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems. / Schoon, Michael; Robards, Martin D.; Meek, Chanda L.; Galaz, Victor.

Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 226-250.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Schoon, M, Robards, MD, Meek, CL & Galaz, V 2015, Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems. in Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 226-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.010
Schoon M, Robards MD, Meek CL, Galaz V. Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems. In Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 226-250 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.010
Schoon, Michael ; Robards, Martin D. ; Meek, Chanda L. ; Galaz, Victor. / Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems. Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 226-250
@inbook{1b034ec3404d45e8864b3ed1704185c9,
title = "Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems",
abstract = "Polycentricity is a governance system in which there are multiple interacting governing bodies with autonomy to make and enforce rules within a specific policy arena and geography. These governance authorities interact with others at similar scales horizontally and within nested scales vertically. Multiple governance units have been suggested to provide many institutional sources for enhancing resilience and create a mechanism enabling other resilience-enhancing factors. In theory, and in empirical cases, they have been found to create a foundation for learning and experimentation, to be a source of policy/institutional diversity, to enable broader levels of participation and to improve connectivity between groups while building in modularity and redundancy. Recent work has started to explore variance in polycentricity - notably, levels of structural inclusiveness (narrowly to more broadly representative) and degree of collaboration (type of collaborative activity). We see a need to learn more about how inclusiveness and degree interact and how they lead to divergent outcomes in different situations, and also when polycentricity succeeds and fails, and to what extent. Studies to date in complex systems have been largely diagnostic and lacked predictive power and precision. In short, there is a lack of understanding of how to operationalize the idea of polycentricity in governance of social-ecological systems.",
author = "Michael Schoon and Robards, {Martin D.} and Meek, {Chanda L.} and Victor Galaz",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781316014240.010",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781316014240",
pages = "226--250",
booktitle = "Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Principle 7 – Promote polycentric governance systems

AU - Schoon, Michael

AU - Robards, Martin D.

AU - Meek, Chanda L.

AU - Galaz, Victor

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Polycentricity is a governance system in which there are multiple interacting governing bodies with autonomy to make and enforce rules within a specific policy arena and geography. These governance authorities interact with others at similar scales horizontally and within nested scales vertically. Multiple governance units have been suggested to provide many institutional sources for enhancing resilience and create a mechanism enabling other resilience-enhancing factors. In theory, and in empirical cases, they have been found to create a foundation for learning and experimentation, to be a source of policy/institutional diversity, to enable broader levels of participation and to improve connectivity between groups while building in modularity and redundancy. Recent work has started to explore variance in polycentricity - notably, levels of structural inclusiveness (narrowly to more broadly representative) and degree of collaboration (type of collaborative activity). We see a need to learn more about how inclusiveness and degree interact and how they lead to divergent outcomes in different situations, and also when polycentricity succeeds and fails, and to what extent. Studies to date in complex systems have been largely diagnostic and lacked predictive power and precision. In short, there is a lack of understanding of how to operationalize the idea of polycentricity in governance of social-ecological systems.

AB - Polycentricity is a governance system in which there are multiple interacting governing bodies with autonomy to make and enforce rules within a specific policy arena and geography. These governance authorities interact with others at similar scales horizontally and within nested scales vertically. Multiple governance units have been suggested to provide many institutional sources for enhancing resilience and create a mechanism enabling other resilience-enhancing factors. In theory, and in empirical cases, they have been found to create a foundation for learning and experimentation, to be a source of policy/institutional diversity, to enable broader levels of participation and to improve connectivity between groups while building in modularity and redundancy. Recent work has started to explore variance in polycentricity - notably, levels of structural inclusiveness (narrowly to more broadly representative) and degree of collaboration (type of collaborative activity). We see a need to learn more about how inclusiveness and degree interact and how they lead to divergent outcomes in different situations, and also when polycentricity succeeds and fails, and to what extent. Studies to date in complex systems have been largely diagnostic and lacked predictive power and precision. In short, there is a lack of understanding of how to operationalize the idea of polycentricity in governance of social-ecological systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953278084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953278084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781316014240.010

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781316014240.010

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84953278084

SN - 9781316014240

SN - 9781107082656

SP - 226

EP - 250

BT - Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -