Primary care after psychiatric crisis

A qualitative analysis

Kim S. Griswold, Luis E. Zayas, Patricia A. Pastore, Susan J. Smith, Christine M. Wagner, Timothy J. Servoss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with serious psychiatric problems experience difficulty accessing primary care. The goals of this study were to assess whether care managers improved access and to understand patients' experiences with health care after a psychiatric crisis. METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive patients seeking care in a psychiatric emergency department were randomly assigned to an intervention group with care managers or a control group. Brief, semistructured interviews about health care encounters were conducted at baseline and 1 year later. Five raters, using the content-driven, immersion-crystallization approach, analyzed 112 baseline and year-end interviews from 28 participants in each group. The main outcomes were patients' responses about their care experiences, connections with primary care, and integration of medical and mental health care. Scores for physical function and mental function were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: At baseline, most participants described negative experiences in receiving care and emphasized the importance of listening, sensitivity, and respect. Fully 71% of patients in the intervention group said that having a care manager to assist them with primary care connections was beneficial. Patients in the intervention group had significantly better physical and mental function than their counterparts in the control group at 6 months (P = .03 for each) but not at 12 months. There was also a trend toward functional improvement over the course of the study in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that care management is effective in helping patients access primary care after a psychiatric crisis. It provides evidence on and insight into how care may be delivered more effectively for this population. Future work should assess the sustainability of care connections and longer-term patient health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-43
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Interviews
Control Groups
Long-Term Care
Immersion
Crystallization
Hospital Emergency Service
Patient Care
Analysis of Variance
Mental Health
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Continuity of care
  • Delivery of health care
  • Health services research
  • Mental health
  • Patient care management
  • Primary care
  • Psychiatry
  • Qualitative research
  • Vulnerable populations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Griswold, K. S., Zayas, L. E., Pastore, P. A., Smith, S. J., Wagner, C. M., & Servoss, T. J. (2008). Primary care after psychiatric crisis: A qualitative analysis. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.760

Primary care after psychiatric crisis : A qualitative analysis. / Griswold, Kim S.; Zayas, Luis E.; Pastore, Patricia A.; Smith, Susan J.; Wagner, Christine M.; Servoss, Timothy J.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 38-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griswold, KS, Zayas, LE, Pastore, PA, Smith, SJ, Wagner, CM & Servoss, TJ 2008, 'Primary care after psychiatric crisis: A qualitative analysis', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.760
Griswold KS, Zayas LE, Pastore PA, Smith SJ, Wagner CM, Servoss TJ. Primary care after psychiatric crisis: A qualitative analysis. Annals of Family Medicine. 2008 Jan;6(1):38-43. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.760
Griswold, Kim S. ; Zayas, Luis E. ; Pastore, Patricia A. ; Smith, Susan J. ; Wagner, Christine M. ; Servoss, Timothy J. / Primary care after psychiatric crisis : A qualitative analysis. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 38-43.
@article{766d30cbf80141c4a829c815286558dd,
title = "Primary care after psychiatric crisis: A qualitative analysis",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Patients with serious psychiatric problems experience difficulty accessing primary care. The goals of this study were to assess whether care managers improved access and to understand patients' experiences with health care after a psychiatric crisis. METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive patients seeking care in a psychiatric emergency department were randomly assigned to an intervention group with care managers or a control group. Brief, semistructured interviews about health care encounters were conducted at baseline and 1 year later. Five raters, using the content-driven, immersion-crystallization approach, analyzed 112 baseline and year-end interviews from 28 participants in each group. The main outcomes were patients' responses about their care experiences, connections with primary care, and integration of medical and mental health care. Scores for physical function and mental function were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: At baseline, most participants described negative experiences in receiving care and emphasized the importance of listening, sensitivity, and respect. Fully 71{\%} of patients in the intervention group said that having a care manager to assist them with primary care connections was beneficial. Patients in the intervention group had significantly better physical and mental function than their counterparts in the control group at 6 months (P = .03 for each) but not at 12 months. There was also a trend toward functional improvement over the course of the study in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that care management is effective in helping patients access primary care after a psychiatric crisis. It provides evidence on and insight into how care may be delivered more effectively for this population. Future work should assess the sustainability of care connections and longer-term patient health outcomes.",
keywords = "Continuity of care, Delivery of health care, Health services research, Mental health, Patient care management, Primary care, Psychiatry, Qualitative research, Vulnerable populations",
author = "Griswold, {Kim S.} and Zayas, {Luis E.} and Pastore, {Patricia A.} and Smith, {Susan J.} and Wagner, {Christine M.} and Servoss, {Timothy J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.760",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "38--43",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care after psychiatric crisis

T2 - A qualitative analysis

AU - Griswold, Kim S.

AU - Zayas, Luis E.

AU - Pastore, Patricia A.

AU - Smith, Susan J.

AU - Wagner, Christine M.

AU - Servoss, Timothy J.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - PURPOSE: Patients with serious psychiatric problems experience difficulty accessing primary care. The goals of this study were to assess whether care managers improved access and to understand patients' experiences with health care after a psychiatric crisis. METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive patients seeking care in a psychiatric emergency department were randomly assigned to an intervention group with care managers or a control group. Brief, semistructured interviews about health care encounters were conducted at baseline and 1 year later. Five raters, using the content-driven, immersion-crystallization approach, analyzed 112 baseline and year-end interviews from 28 participants in each group. The main outcomes were patients' responses about their care experiences, connections with primary care, and integration of medical and mental health care. Scores for physical function and mental function were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: At baseline, most participants described negative experiences in receiving care and emphasized the importance of listening, sensitivity, and respect. Fully 71% of patients in the intervention group said that having a care manager to assist them with primary care connections was beneficial. Patients in the intervention group had significantly better physical and mental function than their counterparts in the control group at 6 months (P = .03 for each) but not at 12 months. There was also a trend toward functional improvement over the course of the study in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that care management is effective in helping patients access primary care after a psychiatric crisis. It provides evidence on and insight into how care may be delivered more effectively for this population. Future work should assess the sustainability of care connections and longer-term patient health outcomes.

AB - PURPOSE: Patients with serious psychiatric problems experience difficulty accessing primary care. The goals of this study were to assess whether care managers improved access and to understand patients' experiences with health care after a psychiatric crisis. METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive patients seeking care in a psychiatric emergency department were randomly assigned to an intervention group with care managers or a control group. Brief, semistructured interviews about health care encounters were conducted at baseline and 1 year later. Five raters, using the content-driven, immersion-crystallization approach, analyzed 112 baseline and year-end interviews from 28 participants in each group. The main outcomes were patients' responses about their care experiences, connections with primary care, and integration of medical and mental health care. Scores for physical function and mental function were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: At baseline, most participants described negative experiences in receiving care and emphasized the importance of listening, sensitivity, and respect. Fully 71% of patients in the intervention group said that having a care manager to assist them with primary care connections was beneficial. Patients in the intervention group had significantly better physical and mental function than their counterparts in the control group at 6 months (P = .03 for each) but not at 12 months. There was also a trend toward functional improvement over the course of the study in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that care management is effective in helping patients access primary care after a psychiatric crisis. It provides evidence on and insight into how care may be delivered more effectively for this population. Future work should assess the sustainability of care connections and longer-term patient health outcomes.

KW - Continuity of care

KW - Delivery of health care

KW - Health services research

KW - Mental health

KW - Patient care management

KW - Primary care

KW - Psychiatry

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Vulnerable populations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349143394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349143394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.760

DO - 10.1370/afm.760

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 38

EP - 43

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 1

ER -