Prevalence of and Differences in Salad Bar Implementation in Rural Versus Urban Arizona Schools

Michelle Blumenschine, Marc Adams, Meredith Bruening

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Rural children consume more calories per day on average than urban children, and they are less likely to consume fruit. Self-service salad bars have been proposed as an effective approach to better meet the National School Lunch Program's fruit and vegetable recommendations. No studies have examined how rural and urban schools differ in the implementation of school salad bars. Objective: To compare the prevalence of school-lunch salad bars and differences in implementation between urban and rural Arizona schools. Design: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional web-based survey. Participants/setting: School nutrition managers (N=596) in the state of Arizona. Main outcomes measured: National Center for Education Statistics locale codes defined rural and urban classifications. Barriers to salad bar implementation were examined among schools that have never had, once had, and currently have a school salad bar. Promotional practices were examined among schools that once had and currently have a school salad bar. Statistical analyses performed: Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare urban and rural differences in presence and implementation of salad bars, adjusting for school-level demographics and the clustering of schools within districts. Results: After adjustment, the prevalence of salad bars did not differ between urban and rural schools (46.9%±4.3% vs 46.8%±8.5%, respectively). Rural schools without salad bars more often reported perceived food waste and cost of produce as barriers to implementing salad bars, and funding was a necessary resource for offering a salad bar in the future, as compared with urban schools (P<0.05). No other geographic differences were observed in reported salad bar promotion, challenges, or resources among schools that currently have or once had a salad bar. Conclusions: After adjustment, salad bar prevalence, implementation practices, and concerns are similar across geographic settings. Future research is needed to investigate methods to address cost and food waste concerns in rural areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

salad bars
food waste
Lunch
National School Lunch Program
Fruit
school lunch

Keywords

  • Fruits and vegetables
  • Rural
  • Salad bars
  • Schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

@article{748a7cb2df27497eb1a952f99361b999,
title = "Prevalence of and Differences in Salad Bar Implementation in Rural Versus Urban Arizona Schools",
abstract = "Background: Rural children consume more calories per day on average than urban children, and they are less likely to consume fruit. Self-service salad bars have been proposed as an effective approach to better meet the National School Lunch Program's fruit and vegetable recommendations. No studies have examined how rural and urban schools differ in the implementation of school salad bars. Objective: To compare the prevalence of school-lunch salad bars and differences in implementation between urban and rural Arizona schools. Design: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional web-based survey. Participants/setting: School nutrition managers (N=596) in the state of Arizona. Main outcomes measured: National Center for Education Statistics locale codes defined rural and urban classifications. Barriers to salad bar implementation were examined among schools that have never had, once had, and currently have a school salad bar. Promotional practices were examined among schools that once had and currently have a school salad bar. Statistical analyses performed: Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare urban and rural differences in presence and implementation of salad bars, adjusting for school-level demographics and the clustering of schools within districts. Results: After adjustment, the prevalence of salad bars did not differ between urban and rural schools (46.9{\%}±4.3{\%} vs 46.8{\%}±8.5{\%}, respectively). Rural schools without salad bars more often reported perceived food waste and cost of produce as barriers to implementing salad bars, and funding was a necessary resource for offering a salad bar in the future, as compared with urban schools (P<0.05). No other geographic differences were observed in reported salad bar promotion, challenges, or resources among schools that currently have or once had a salad bar. Conclusions: After adjustment, salad bar prevalence, implementation practices, and concerns are similar across geographic settings. Future research is needed to investigate methods to address cost and food waste concerns in rural areas.",
keywords = "Fruits and vegetables, Rural, Salad bars, Schools",
author = "Michelle Blumenschine and Marc Adams and Meredith Bruening",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "2212-2672",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of and Differences in Salad Bar Implementation in Rural Versus Urban Arizona Schools

AU - Blumenschine, Michelle

AU - Adams, Marc

AU - Bruening, Meredith

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Rural children consume more calories per day on average than urban children, and they are less likely to consume fruit. Self-service salad bars have been proposed as an effective approach to better meet the National School Lunch Program's fruit and vegetable recommendations. No studies have examined how rural and urban schools differ in the implementation of school salad bars. Objective: To compare the prevalence of school-lunch salad bars and differences in implementation between urban and rural Arizona schools. Design: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional web-based survey. Participants/setting: School nutrition managers (N=596) in the state of Arizona. Main outcomes measured: National Center for Education Statistics locale codes defined rural and urban classifications. Barriers to salad bar implementation were examined among schools that have never had, once had, and currently have a school salad bar. Promotional practices were examined among schools that once had and currently have a school salad bar. Statistical analyses performed: Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare urban and rural differences in presence and implementation of salad bars, adjusting for school-level demographics and the clustering of schools within districts. Results: After adjustment, the prevalence of salad bars did not differ between urban and rural schools (46.9%±4.3% vs 46.8%±8.5%, respectively). Rural schools without salad bars more often reported perceived food waste and cost of produce as barriers to implementing salad bars, and funding was a necessary resource for offering a salad bar in the future, as compared with urban schools (P<0.05). No other geographic differences were observed in reported salad bar promotion, challenges, or resources among schools that currently have or once had a salad bar. Conclusions: After adjustment, salad bar prevalence, implementation practices, and concerns are similar across geographic settings. Future research is needed to investigate methods to address cost and food waste concerns in rural areas.

AB - Background: Rural children consume more calories per day on average than urban children, and they are less likely to consume fruit. Self-service salad bars have been proposed as an effective approach to better meet the National School Lunch Program's fruit and vegetable recommendations. No studies have examined how rural and urban schools differ in the implementation of school salad bars. Objective: To compare the prevalence of school-lunch salad bars and differences in implementation between urban and rural Arizona schools. Design: Secondary analysis of a cross-sectional web-based survey. Participants/setting: School nutrition managers (N=596) in the state of Arizona. Main outcomes measured: National Center for Education Statistics locale codes defined rural and urban classifications. Barriers to salad bar implementation were examined among schools that have never had, once had, and currently have a school salad bar. Promotional practices were examined among schools that once had and currently have a school salad bar. Statistical analyses performed: Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare urban and rural differences in presence and implementation of salad bars, adjusting for school-level demographics and the clustering of schools within districts. Results: After adjustment, the prevalence of salad bars did not differ between urban and rural schools (46.9%±4.3% vs 46.8%±8.5%, respectively). Rural schools without salad bars more often reported perceived food waste and cost of produce as barriers to implementing salad bars, and funding was a necessary resource for offering a salad bar in the future, as compared with urban schools (P<0.05). No other geographic differences were observed in reported salad bar promotion, challenges, or resources among schools that currently have or once had a salad bar. Conclusions: After adjustment, salad bar prevalence, implementation practices, and concerns are similar across geographic settings. Future research is needed to investigate methods to address cost and food waste concerns in rural areas.

KW - Fruits and vegetables

KW - Rural

KW - Salad bars

KW - Schools

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035783295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035783295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.004

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 2212-2672

ER -