Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers

Jessica Holloway, Ann Nielsen, Sarah Saltmarsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary accountability frameworks position school leaders as being essential to improving school performance and driving innovation. Simultaneously, new accountability demands have forced the restructuring of school leadership, both in terms of form and function. In this paper, we look at the growing trend of distributed leadership among teachers who are tasked to assume leadership roles while maintaining their (sometimes reduced) teaching responsibilities. In the US, federally backed programs have incentivized schools to bolster teacher leadership opportunities, often predicated on claims of teacher empowerment and leadership democratization. Given the rise in distributed leadership as a prescribed local governance structure, we examined one popular distributed leadership model in the US to better understand how the teacher leaders are experiencing their dual roles and responsibilities. Drawing on focus group interviews with mentor teachers, we found tension between the teachers’ expectations with regard to increased collegiality and mentoring opportunities, and their actual experiences of bureaucratic control and finding that their expectations were unrealistic. We argue that prescribed, incentive-driven forms of distributed leadership can place teacher leaders in precarious positions that demand more of their time, while limiting their capacities to participate in the leadership practices they deem most valuable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)538-555
Number of pages18
JournalEducational Management Administration and Leadership
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

leadership
responsibility
teacher
experience
leader
school
Accountability
Mentor
Distributed leadership
dual role
mentoring
democratization
empowerment
restructuring
incentive
governance
innovation
demand
trend
Teaching

Keywords

  • distributed leadership
  • mentor teachers
  • peer evaluators
  • Teacher leaders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability : The experiences of mentor teachers. / Holloway, Jessica; Nielsen, Ann; Saltmarsh, Sarah.

In: Educational Management Administration and Leadership, Vol. 46, No. 4, 01.07.2018, p. 538-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f3f70a790ea48e8b36bb5c13324a48d,
title = "Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers",
abstract = "Contemporary accountability frameworks position school leaders as being essential to improving school performance and driving innovation. Simultaneously, new accountability demands have forced the restructuring of school leadership, both in terms of form and function. In this paper, we look at the growing trend of distributed leadership among teachers who are tasked to assume leadership roles while maintaining their (sometimes reduced) teaching responsibilities. In the US, federally backed programs have incentivized schools to bolster teacher leadership opportunities, often predicated on claims of teacher empowerment and leadership democratization. Given the rise in distributed leadership as a prescribed local governance structure, we examined one popular distributed leadership model in the US to better understand how the teacher leaders are experiencing their dual roles and responsibilities. Drawing on focus group interviews with mentor teachers, we found tension between the teachers’ expectations with regard to increased collegiality and mentoring opportunities, and their actual experiences of bureaucratic control and finding that their expectations were unrealistic. We argue that prescribed, incentive-driven forms of distributed leadership can place teacher leaders in precarious positions that demand more of their time, while limiting their capacities to participate in the leadership practices they deem most valuable.",
keywords = "distributed leadership, mentor teachers, peer evaluators, Teacher leaders",
author = "Jessica Holloway and Ann Nielsen and Sarah Saltmarsh",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1741143216688469",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "538--555",
journal = "Educational Management Administration and Leadership",
issn = "1741-1432",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability

T2 - The experiences of mentor teachers

AU - Holloway, Jessica

AU - Nielsen, Ann

AU - Saltmarsh, Sarah

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Contemporary accountability frameworks position school leaders as being essential to improving school performance and driving innovation. Simultaneously, new accountability demands have forced the restructuring of school leadership, both in terms of form and function. In this paper, we look at the growing trend of distributed leadership among teachers who are tasked to assume leadership roles while maintaining their (sometimes reduced) teaching responsibilities. In the US, federally backed programs have incentivized schools to bolster teacher leadership opportunities, often predicated on claims of teacher empowerment and leadership democratization. Given the rise in distributed leadership as a prescribed local governance structure, we examined one popular distributed leadership model in the US to better understand how the teacher leaders are experiencing their dual roles and responsibilities. Drawing on focus group interviews with mentor teachers, we found tension between the teachers’ expectations with regard to increased collegiality and mentoring opportunities, and their actual experiences of bureaucratic control and finding that their expectations were unrealistic. We argue that prescribed, incentive-driven forms of distributed leadership can place teacher leaders in precarious positions that demand more of their time, while limiting their capacities to participate in the leadership practices they deem most valuable.

AB - Contemporary accountability frameworks position school leaders as being essential to improving school performance and driving innovation. Simultaneously, new accountability demands have forced the restructuring of school leadership, both in terms of form and function. In this paper, we look at the growing trend of distributed leadership among teachers who are tasked to assume leadership roles while maintaining their (sometimes reduced) teaching responsibilities. In the US, federally backed programs have incentivized schools to bolster teacher leadership opportunities, often predicated on claims of teacher empowerment and leadership democratization. Given the rise in distributed leadership as a prescribed local governance structure, we examined one popular distributed leadership model in the US to better understand how the teacher leaders are experiencing their dual roles and responsibilities. Drawing on focus group interviews with mentor teachers, we found tension between the teachers’ expectations with regard to increased collegiality and mentoring opportunities, and their actual experiences of bureaucratic control and finding that their expectations were unrealistic. We argue that prescribed, incentive-driven forms of distributed leadership can place teacher leaders in precarious positions that demand more of their time, while limiting their capacities to participate in the leadership practices they deem most valuable.

KW - distributed leadership

KW - mentor teachers

KW - peer evaluators

KW - Teacher leaders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046772646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046772646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1741143216688469

DO - 10.1177/1741143216688469

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046772646

VL - 46

SP - 538

EP - 555

JO - Educational Management Administration and Leadership

JF - Educational Management Administration and Leadership

SN - 1741-1432

IS - 4

ER -