Preparing Social Work Students for Interprofessional Practice in Geriatric Health Care: Insights from Two Approaches

Robin Bonifas, Amanda K. Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although several interprofessional education projects have addressed training allied health students for effective teamwork in geriatrics, few curriculum evaluation studies have examined differences in learning outcomes between interprofessional and traditional uniprofessional approaches, especially for social work students. This paper compares and contrasts two brief curriculum models designed to prepare graduate social work students for interdisciplinary collaboration in geriatric health care. The first model is an interprofessional approach that brings together students from social work, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and nutrition for an interactive session on interdisciplinary care. The second model is a uniprofessional approach that addresses interdisciplinary collaboration within a traditional social work practice course. A pretest/posttest quasiexperimental design was employed to examine differences between the two curriculum approaches in terms of changes in social work students' attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary teamwork and their understanding of the roles and training requirements of multidisciplinary colleagues. Results indicate that students in the interprofessional curriculum (n = 69) made significant gains in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration but not in their understanding of the roles and training of other disciplines. Conversely, students in the uniprofessional curriculum (n = 19) made significant improvement in their recognition of individual team members' professional roles but experienced minimal change in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings suggest an interprofessional approach is most conducive to changing students' appreciation and understanding of the importance of interdisciplinary teams, but personal engagement with content on interdisciplinary roles and training is essential for mastery of this knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)476-490
Number of pages15
JournalEducational Gerontology
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

geriatrics
Social Work
Geriatrics
social work
health care
Students
Delivery of Health Care
Curriculum
student
curriculum
teamwork
curriculum evaluation
Values
Professional Role
Practice (Psychology)
nutrition
Nursing
nursing
graduate
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Education

Cite this

Preparing Social Work Students for Interprofessional Practice in Geriatric Health Care : Insights from Two Approaches. / Bonifas, Robin; Gray, Amanda K.

In: Educational Gerontology, Vol. 39, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 476-490.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebcb9e1647fb4e3399939cc3938e962d,
title = "Preparing Social Work Students for Interprofessional Practice in Geriatric Health Care: Insights from Two Approaches",
abstract = "Although several interprofessional education projects have addressed training allied health students for effective teamwork in geriatrics, few curriculum evaluation studies have examined differences in learning outcomes between interprofessional and traditional uniprofessional approaches, especially for social work students. This paper compares and contrasts two brief curriculum models designed to prepare graduate social work students for interdisciplinary collaboration in geriatric health care. The first model is an interprofessional approach that brings together students from social work, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and nutrition for an interactive session on interdisciplinary care. The second model is a uniprofessional approach that addresses interdisciplinary collaboration within a traditional social work practice course. A pretest/posttest quasiexperimental design was employed to examine differences between the two curriculum approaches in terms of changes in social work students' attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary teamwork and their understanding of the roles and training requirements of multidisciplinary colleagues. Results indicate that students in the interprofessional curriculum (n = 69) made significant gains in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration but not in their understanding of the roles and training of other disciplines. Conversely, students in the uniprofessional curriculum (n = 19) made significant improvement in their recognition of individual team members' professional roles but experienced minimal change in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings suggest an interprofessional approach is most conducive to changing students' appreciation and understanding of the importance of interdisciplinary teams, but personal engagement with content on interdisciplinary roles and training is essential for mastery of this knowledge.",
author = "Robin Bonifas and Gray, {Amanda K.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/03601277.2012.701137",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "476--490",
journal = "Educational Gerontology",
issn = "0360-1277",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparing Social Work Students for Interprofessional Practice in Geriatric Health Care

T2 - Insights from Two Approaches

AU - Bonifas, Robin

AU - Gray, Amanda K.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Although several interprofessional education projects have addressed training allied health students for effective teamwork in geriatrics, few curriculum evaluation studies have examined differences in learning outcomes between interprofessional and traditional uniprofessional approaches, especially for social work students. This paper compares and contrasts two brief curriculum models designed to prepare graduate social work students for interdisciplinary collaboration in geriatric health care. The first model is an interprofessional approach that brings together students from social work, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and nutrition for an interactive session on interdisciplinary care. The second model is a uniprofessional approach that addresses interdisciplinary collaboration within a traditional social work practice course. A pretest/posttest quasiexperimental design was employed to examine differences between the two curriculum approaches in terms of changes in social work students' attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary teamwork and their understanding of the roles and training requirements of multidisciplinary colleagues. Results indicate that students in the interprofessional curriculum (n = 69) made significant gains in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration but not in their understanding of the roles and training of other disciplines. Conversely, students in the uniprofessional curriculum (n = 19) made significant improvement in their recognition of individual team members' professional roles but experienced minimal change in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings suggest an interprofessional approach is most conducive to changing students' appreciation and understanding of the importance of interdisciplinary teams, but personal engagement with content on interdisciplinary roles and training is essential for mastery of this knowledge.

AB - Although several interprofessional education projects have addressed training allied health students for effective teamwork in geriatrics, few curriculum evaluation studies have examined differences in learning outcomes between interprofessional and traditional uniprofessional approaches, especially for social work students. This paper compares and contrasts two brief curriculum models designed to prepare graduate social work students for interdisciplinary collaboration in geriatric health care. The first model is an interprofessional approach that brings together students from social work, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and nutrition for an interactive session on interdisciplinary care. The second model is a uniprofessional approach that addresses interdisciplinary collaboration within a traditional social work practice course. A pretest/posttest quasiexperimental design was employed to examine differences between the two curriculum approaches in terms of changes in social work students' attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary teamwork and their understanding of the roles and training requirements of multidisciplinary colleagues. Results indicate that students in the interprofessional curriculum (n = 69) made significant gains in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration but not in their understanding of the roles and training of other disciplines. Conversely, students in the uniprofessional curriculum (n = 19) made significant improvement in their recognition of individual team members' professional roles but experienced minimal change in their attitudes and values toward interdisciplinary collaboration. Findings suggest an interprofessional approach is most conducive to changing students' appreciation and understanding of the importance of interdisciplinary teams, but personal engagement with content on interdisciplinary roles and training is essential for mastery of this knowledge.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877260868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877260868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03601277.2012.701137

DO - 10.1080/03601277.2012.701137

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877260868

VL - 39

SP - 476

EP - 490

JO - Educational Gerontology

JF - Educational Gerontology

SN - 0360-1277

IS - 7

ER -