Preference assessments and structured potential adopter-dog interactions increase adoptions

Alexandra Protopopova, Maria Brandifino, Clive Wynne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research showed that lying down next to potential adopters and not ignoring their play initiations during interactions outside of the kennel correlate with increased likelihood of adoption in shelter dogs. In the present study, we experimentally assessed whether increasing these behaviors during interactions with potential adopters influenced adoption outcomes. In Experiment 1, we validated a brief play preference assessment in order to find individual preferences for toys in shelter dogs. We found that play with specific toys in the preference assessment predicted play in more naturalistic settings (χ2 = 10.50, P <0.001, n = 20). We then used a modification of this assessment as part of the experimental intervention. In Experiment 2, we randomly assigned dogs to the experimental structured-interaction (Group SI) and control (Group C) groups and evaluated 160 interactions between these dogs and potential adopters. The experimental intervention consisted of conducting a play preference assessment prior to the interaction and structuring the interaction once a potential adopter expressed interest in the dog. The structured interaction involved Phase 1-in which the visitor was encouraged to allow the dog to eliminate, Phase 2-in which the experimenter encouraged play with the dog's preferred toy, and Phase 3-in which the experimenter encouraged the dog to lie down next to a potential adopter by restraining the dog with a short leash and luring into a down position with treats. A mixed-effects logistic regression model revealed that group membership, but not morphology of the dog, was predictive of adoption outcome (χ2 = 3.95, P <0.047). Dogs in Group SI engaged in less undesirable behavior and were 2.49 times more likely to be adopted than dogs in Group C (23.3% adopted in Group C and 39.2% adopted in Group SI). A questionnaire revealed that potential adopters did not find the structured interaction intrusive. This validated intervention could be used in animal shelters to increase adoption rates in dogs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-95
Number of pages9
JournalApplied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume176
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Dogs
dogs
toys
Play and Playthings
Control Groups
Logistic Models
questionnaires
Research

Keywords

  • Adoption
  • Animal shelter
  • Dog training
  • Preference assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Food Animals

Cite this

Preference assessments and structured potential adopter-dog interactions increase adoptions. / Protopopova, Alexandra; Brandifino, Maria; Wynne, Clive.

In: Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Vol. 176, 01.03.2016, p. 87-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89d7f8770b964ea0bb418c58e0f94677,
title = "Preference assessments and structured potential adopter-dog interactions increase adoptions",
abstract = "Previous research showed that lying down next to potential adopters and not ignoring their play initiations during interactions outside of the kennel correlate with increased likelihood of adoption in shelter dogs. In the present study, we experimentally assessed whether increasing these behaviors during interactions with potential adopters influenced adoption outcomes. In Experiment 1, we validated a brief play preference assessment in order to find individual preferences for toys in shelter dogs. We found that play with specific toys in the preference assessment predicted play in more naturalistic settings (χ2 = 10.50, P <0.001, n = 20). We then used a modification of this assessment as part of the experimental intervention. In Experiment 2, we randomly assigned dogs to the experimental structured-interaction (Group SI) and control (Group C) groups and evaluated 160 interactions between these dogs and potential adopters. The experimental intervention consisted of conducting a play preference assessment prior to the interaction and structuring the interaction once a potential adopter expressed interest in the dog. The structured interaction involved Phase 1-in which the visitor was encouraged to allow the dog to eliminate, Phase 2-in which the experimenter encouraged play with the dog's preferred toy, and Phase 3-in which the experimenter encouraged the dog to lie down next to a potential adopter by restraining the dog with a short leash and luring into a down position with treats. A mixed-effects logistic regression model revealed that group membership, but not morphology of the dog, was predictive of adoption outcome (χ2 = 3.95, P <0.047). Dogs in Group SI engaged in less undesirable behavior and were 2.49 times more likely to be adopted than dogs in Group C (23.3{\%} adopted in Group C and 39.2{\%} adopted in Group SI). A questionnaire revealed that potential adopters did not find the structured interaction intrusive. This validated intervention could be used in animal shelters to increase adoption rates in dogs.",
keywords = "Adoption, Animal shelter, Dog training, Preference assessment",
author = "Alexandra Protopopova and Maria Brandifino and Clive Wynne",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.applanim.2015.12.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "87--95",
journal = "Applied Animal Behaviour Science",
issn = "0168-1591",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preference assessments and structured potential adopter-dog interactions increase adoptions

AU - Protopopova, Alexandra

AU - Brandifino, Maria

AU - Wynne, Clive

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Previous research showed that lying down next to potential adopters and not ignoring their play initiations during interactions outside of the kennel correlate with increased likelihood of adoption in shelter dogs. In the present study, we experimentally assessed whether increasing these behaviors during interactions with potential adopters influenced adoption outcomes. In Experiment 1, we validated a brief play preference assessment in order to find individual preferences for toys in shelter dogs. We found that play with specific toys in the preference assessment predicted play in more naturalistic settings (χ2 = 10.50, P <0.001, n = 20). We then used a modification of this assessment as part of the experimental intervention. In Experiment 2, we randomly assigned dogs to the experimental structured-interaction (Group SI) and control (Group C) groups and evaluated 160 interactions between these dogs and potential adopters. The experimental intervention consisted of conducting a play preference assessment prior to the interaction and structuring the interaction once a potential adopter expressed interest in the dog. The structured interaction involved Phase 1-in which the visitor was encouraged to allow the dog to eliminate, Phase 2-in which the experimenter encouraged play with the dog's preferred toy, and Phase 3-in which the experimenter encouraged the dog to lie down next to a potential adopter by restraining the dog with a short leash and luring into a down position with treats. A mixed-effects logistic regression model revealed that group membership, but not morphology of the dog, was predictive of adoption outcome (χ2 = 3.95, P <0.047). Dogs in Group SI engaged in less undesirable behavior and were 2.49 times more likely to be adopted than dogs in Group C (23.3% adopted in Group C and 39.2% adopted in Group SI). A questionnaire revealed that potential adopters did not find the structured interaction intrusive. This validated intervention could be used in animal shelters to increase adoption rates in dogs.

AB - Previous research showed that lying down next to potential adopters and not ignoring their play initiations during interactions outside of the kennel correlate with increased likelihood of adoption in shelter dogs. In the present study, we experimentally assessed whether increasing these behaviors during interactions with potential adopters influenced adoption outcomes. In Experiment 1, we validated a brief play preference assessment in order to find individual preferences for toys in shelter dogs. We found that play with specific toys in the preference assessment predicted play in more naturalistic settings (χ2 = 10.50, P <0.001, n = 20). We then used a modification of this assessment as part of the experimental intervention. In Experiment 2, we randomly assigned dogs to the experimental structured-interaction (Group SI) and control (Group C) groups and evaluated 160 interactions between these dogs and potential adopters. The experimental intervention consisted of conducting a play preference assessment prior to the interaction and structuring the interaction once a potential adopter expressed interest in the dog. The structured interaction involved Phase 1-in which the visitor was encouraged to allow the dog to eliminate, Phase 2-in which the experimenter encouraged play with the dog's preferred toy, and Phase 3-in which the experimenter encouraged the dog to lie down next to a potential adopter by restraining the dog with a short leash and luring into a down position with treats. A mixed-effects logistic regression model revealed that group membership, but not morphology of the dog, was predictive of adoption outcome (χ2 = 3.95, P <0.047). Dogs in Group SI engaged in less undesirable behavior and were 2.49 times more likely to be adopted than dogs in Group C (23.3% adopted in Group C and 39.2% adopted in Group SI). A questionnaire revealed that potential adopters did not find the structured interaction intrusive. This validated intervention could be used in animal shelters to increase adoption rates in dogs.

KW - Adoption

KW - Animal shelter

KW - Dog training

KW - Preference assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958163348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958163348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.12.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84958163348

VL - 176

SP - 87

EP - 95

JO - Applied Animal Behaviour Science

JF - Applied Animal Behaviour Science

SN - 0168-1591

ER -