Predicting Judgment Time From Measures of Psychological Proximity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pathfinder networks are evaluated in terms of their ability to predict Ss' response time in category and size judgment tasks. For both tasks, pairwise proximities derived from the network representation of relatedness estimates predicted response times independently of the original relatedness estimates. These results indicate that Pathfinder proximities represent psychological proximity as measured by judgment time better than Ss' own estimates of relatedness. Pathfinder's predictive ability is derived from a focus on relatedness estimates from the more sensitive related end of the rating scale. Evidence supporting this account is presented, and an explanation for sensitivity differences among ratings is proposed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)640-653
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Reaction Time
Psychology
ability
rating scale
rating
evidence
time
Psychological
Proximity
Response Time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Predicting Judgment Time From Measures of Psychological Proximity. / Cooke, Nancy.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.1992, p. 640-653.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4bb719920154de38d148e833cf96624,
title = "Predicting Judgment Time From Measures of Psychological Proximity",
abstract = "Pathfinder networks are evaluated in terms of their ability to predict Ss' response time in category and size judgment tasks. For both tasks, pairwise proximities derived from the network representation of relatedness estimates predicted response times independently of the original relatedness estimates. These results indicate that Pathfinder proximities represent psychological proximity as measured by judgment time better than Ss' own estimates of relatedness. Pathfinder's predictive ability is derived from a focus on relatedness estimates from the more sensitive related end of the rating scale. Evidence supporting this account is presented, and an explanation for sensitivity differences among ratings is proposed.",
author = "Nancy Cooke",
year = "1992",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "640--653",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting Judgment Time From Measures of Psychological Proximity

AU - Cooke, Nancy

PY - 1992/5

Y1 - 1992/5

N2 - Pathfinder networks are evaluated in terms of their ability to predict Ss' response time in category and size judgment tasks. For both tasks, pairwise proximities derived from the network representation of relatedness estimates predicted response times independently of the original relatedness estimates. These results indicate that Pathfinder proximities represent psychological proximity as measured by judgment time better than Ss' own estimates of relatedness. Pathfinder's predictive ability is derived from a focus on relatedness estimates from the more sensitive related end of the rating scale. Evidence supporting this account is presented, and an explanation for sensitivity differences among ratings is proposed.

AB - Pathfinder networks are evaluated in terms of their ability to predict Ss' response time in category and size judgment tasks. For both tasks, pairwise proximities derived from the network representation of relatedness estimates predicted response times independently of the original relatedness estimates. These results indicate that Pathfinder proximities represent psychological proximity as measured by judgment time better than Ss' own estimates of relatedness. Pathfinder's predictive ability is derived from a focus on relatedness estimates from the more sensitive related end of the rating scale. Evidence supporting this account is presented, and an explanation for sensitivity differences among ratings is proposed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0012921167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0012921167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0012921167

VL - 18

SP - 640

EP - 653

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -