TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting habitat affinities of plant species using commonly measured functional traits
AU - Shipley, Bill
AU - Belluau, Michael
AU - Kühn, Ingolf
AU - Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A.
AU - Bahn, Michael
AU - Penuelas, Josep
AU - Kattge, Jens
AU - Sack, Lawren
AU - Cavender-Bares, Jeannine
AU - Ozinga, Wim A.
AU - Blonder, Benjamin
AU - van Bodegom, Peter M.
AU - Manning, Peter
AU - Hickler, Thomas
AU - Sosinski, Enio
AU - Pillar, Valério De Patta
AU - Onipchenko, Vladimir
AU - Poschlod, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially funded by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Grant to BS. VO was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (# 14-50-00029). The study has been supported by the TRY initiative on plant traits (http://www.try-db.org). The TRY initiative and database is hosted at the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany. TRY is currently supported by DIVERSITAS/Future Earth and the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Association for Vegetation Science
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Questions: Heinz Ellenberg classically defined “indicator” scores for species representing their typical positions along gradients of key environmental variables, and these have proven very useful for designating ecological distributions. We tested a key tenent of trait-based ecology, i.e. the ability to predict ecological preferences from species’ traits. More specifically, can we predict Ellenberg indicator scores for soil nutrients, soil moisture and irradiance from four well-studied traits: leaf area, leaf dry matter content, specific leaf area (SLA) and seed mass? Can we use such relationships to estimate Ellenberg scores for species never classified by Ellenberg?. Location: Global. Methods: Cumulative link models were developed to predict Ellenberg nutrients, irradiance and moisture values from Ln-transformed trait values using 922, 981 and 988 species, respectively. We then independently tested these prediction equations using the trait values of 423 and 421 new species that occurred elsewere in Europe, North America and Morocco, and whose habitat affinities we could classify from independent sources as three-level ordinal ranks related to soil moisture and irradiance. The traits were SLA, leaf dry matter content, leaf area and seed mass. Results: The four functional traits predicted the Ellenberg indicator scores of site fertility, light and moisture with average error rates of <2 Ellenberg ranks out of nine. We then used the trait values of 423 and 421 species, respectively, that occurred (mostly) outside of Germany but whose habitat affinities we could classify as three-level ordinal ranks related to soil moisture and irradiance. The predicted positions of the new species, given the equations derived from the Ellenberg indices, agreed well with their independent habitat classifications, although our equation for Ellenberg irrandiance levels performed poorly on the lower ranks. Conclusions: These prediction equations, and their eventual extensions, could be used to provide approximate descriptions of habitat affinities of large numbers of species worldwide.
AB - Questions: Heinz Ellenberg classically defined “indicator” scores for species representing their typical positions along gradients of key environmental variables, and these have proven very useful for designating ecological distributions. We tested a key tenent of trait-based ecology, i.e. the ability to predict ecological preferences from species’ traits. More specifically, can we predict Ellenberg indicator scores for soil nutrients, soil moisture and irradiance from four well-studied traits: leaf area, leaf dry matter content, specific leaf area (SLA) and seed mass? Can we use such relationships to estimate Ellenberg scores for species never classified by Ellenberg?. Location: Global. Methods: Cumulative link models were developed to predict Ellenberg nutrients, irradiance and moisture values from Ln-transformed trait values using 922, 981 and 988 species, respectively. We then independently tested these prediction equations using the trait values of 423 and 421 new species that occurred elsewere in Europe, North America and Morocco, and whose habitat affinities we could classify from independent sources as three-level ordinal ranks related to soil moisture and irradiance. The traits were SLA, leaf dry matter content, leaf area and seed mass. Results: The four functional traits predicted the Ellenberg indicator scores of site fertility, light and moisture with average error rates of <2 Ellenberg ranks out of nine. We then used the trait values of 423 and 421 species, respectively, that occurred (mostly) outside of Germany but whose habitat affinities we could classify as three-level ordinal ranks related to soil moisture and irradiance. The predicted positions of the new species, given the equations derived from the Ellenberg indices, agreed well with their independent habitat classifications, although our equation for Ellenberg irrandiance levels performed poorly on the lower ranks. Conclusions: These prediction equations, and their eventual extensions, could be used to provide approximate descriptions of habitat affinities of large numbers of species worldwide.
KW - Environmental gradients
KW - Habitat affinities
KW - Habitat fertility
KW - Leaf dry matter content
KW - Leaf size
KW - Seed size
KW - Shade
KW - Soil moisture
KW - Soil nutrients
KW - Specific leaf area
KW - Understorey plants
KW - Wetlands
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023647440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023647440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jvs.12554
DO - 10.1111/jvs.12554
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85023647440
SN - 1100-9233
VL - 28
SP - 1082
EP - 1095
JO - Journal of Vegetation Science
JF - Journal of Vegetation Science
IS - 5
ER -