Predicting extinction risk in spite of predator-prey oscillations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most population viability analyses (PVA) assume that the effects of species interactions are subsumed by population-level parameters. We examine how robust five commonly used PVA models are to violations of this assumption. We develop a stochastic, stage-structured predator-prey model and simulate prey population vital rates and abundance. We then use simulated data to parameterize and estimate risk for three demographic models (static projection matrix, stochastic projection matrix, stochastic vital rate matrix) and two time series models (diffusion approximation [DA], corrupted diffusion approximation [CDA]). Model bias is measured as the absolute deviation between estimated and observed quasi-extinction risk. Our results highlight three generalities about the application of single-species models to multi-species conservation problems. First, our collective model results suggest that most single-species PVA models overestimate extinction risk when species interactions cause periodic variation in abundance. Second, the DA model produces the most (conservatively) biased risk forecasts. Finally, the CDA model is the most robust PVA to population cycles caused by species interactions. CDA models produce virtually unbiased and relatively precise risk estimates even when populations cycle strongly. High performance of simple time series models like the CDA owes to their ability to effectively partition stochastic and deterministic sources of variation in population abundance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1543-1554
Number of pages12
JournalEcological Applications
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

extinction risk
oscillation
predator
viability
population cycle
time series
matrix
species conservation

Keywords

  • Corrupted diffusion approximation
  • Extinction
  • Parameter estimation
  • Population cycles
  • Population viability analysis
  • Predator-prey
  • Projection matrix
  • Species interactions
  • Stage structure
  • Stochasticity
  • Time series
  • Vital rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Predicting extinction risk in spite of predator-prey oscillations. / Sabo, John; Gerber, Leah.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 17, No. 5, 07.2007, p. 1543-1554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e71ee67973734dd99c3dfce36074aeeb,
title = "Predicting extinction risk in spite of predator-prey oscillations",
abstract = "Most population viability analyses (PVA) assume that the effects of species interactions are subsumed by population-level parameters. We examine how robust five commonly used PVA models are to violations of this assumption. We develop a stochastic, stage-structured predator-prey model and simulate prey population vital rates and abundance. We then use simulated data to parameterize and estimate risk for three demographic models (static projection matrix, stochastic projection matrix, stochastic vital rate matrix) and two time series models (diffusion approximation [DA], corrupted diffusion approximation [CDA]). Model bias is measured as the absolute deviation between estimated and observed quasi-extinction risk. Our results highlight three generalities about the application of single-species models to multi-species conservation problems. First, our collective model results suggest that most single-species PVA models overestimate extinction risk when species interactions cause periodic variation in abundance. Second, the DA model produces the most (conservatively) biased risk forecasts. Finally, the CDA model is the most robust PVA to population cycles caused by species interactions. CDA models produce virtually unbiased and relatively precise risk estimates even when populations cycle strongly. High performance of simple time series models like the CDA owes to their ability to effectively partition stochastic and deterministic sources of variation in population abundance.",
keywords = "Corrupted diffusion approximation, Extinction, Parameter estimation, Population cycles, Population viability analysis, Predator-prey, Projection matrix, Species interactions, Stage structure, Stochasticity, Time series, Vital rate",
author = "John Sabo and Leah Gerber",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1890/06-0630.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1543--1554",
journal = "Ecological Appplications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting extinction risk in spite of predator-prey oscillations

AU - Sabo, John

AU - Gerber, Leah

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Most population viability analyses (PVA) assume that the effects of species interactions are subsumed by population-level parameters. We examine how robust five commonly used PVA models are to violations of this assumption. We develop a stochastic, stage-structured predator-prey model and simulate prey population vital rates and abundance. We then use simulated data to parameterize and estimate risk for three demographic models (static projection matrix, stochastic projection matrix, stochastic vital rate matrix) and two time series models (diffusion approximation [DA], corrupted diffusion approximation [CDA]). Model bias is measured as the absolute deviation between estimated and observed quasi-extinction risk. Our results highlight three generalities about the application of single-species models to multi-species conservation problems. First, our collective model results suggest that most single-species PVA models overestimate extinction risk when species interactions cause periodic variation in abundance. Second, the DA model produces the most (conservatively) biased risk forecasts. Finally, the CDA model is the most robust PVA to population cycles caused by species interactions. CDA models produce virtually unbiased and relatively precise risk estimates even when populations cycle strongly. High performance of simple time series models like the CDA owes to their ability to effectively partition stochastic and deterministic sources of variation in population abundance.

AB - Most population viability analyses (PVA) assume that the effects of species interactions are subsumed by population-level parameters. We examine how robust five commonly used PVA models are to violations of this assumption. We develop a stochastic, stage-structured predator-prey model and simulate prey population vital rates and abundance. We then use simulated data to parameterize and estimate risk for three demographic models (static projection matrix, stochastic projection matrix, stochastic vital rate matrix) and two time series models (diffusion approximation [DA], corrupted diffusion approximation [CDA]). Model bias is measured as the absolute deviation between estimated and observed quasi-extinction risk. Our results highlight three generalities about the application of single-species models to multi-species conservation problems. First, our collective model results suggest that most single-species PVA models overestimate extinction risk when species interactions cause periodic variation in abundance. Second, the DA model produces the most (conservatively) biased risk forecasts. Finally, the CDA model is the most robust PVA to population cycles caused by species interactions. CDA models produce virtually unbiased and relatively precise risk estimates even when populations cycle strongly. High performance of simple time series models like the CDA owes to their ability to effectively partition stochastic and deterministic sources of variation in population abundance.

KW - Corrupted diffusion approximation

KW - Extinction

KW - Parameter estimation

KW - Population cycles

KW - Population viability analysis

KW - Predator-prey

KW - Projection matrix

KW - Species interactions

KW - Stage structure

KW - Stochasticity

KW - Time series

KW - Vital rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848909387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848909387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1890/06-0630.1

DO - 10.1890/06-0630.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 17708227

AN - SCOPUS:34848909387

VL - 17

SP - 1543

EP - 1554

JO - Ecological Appplications

JF - Ecological Appplications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 5

ER -