Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature

Ben Minteer, Robert E. Manning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing number of contributors to environmental philosophy are beginning to rethink the field's mission and practice. Noting that the emphasis of protracted conceptual battles over axiology may not get us very far in solving environmental problems, many environmental ethicists have begun to advocate a more pragmatic, pluralistic, and policy-based approach in philosophical discussions about human-nature relationships. In this paper, we argue for the legitimacy of this approach, stressing that public deliberation and debate over alternative environmental ethics is necessary for a culture of democracy to be upheld in decision making and policy formulation. Then we argue for a democratically tempered environmental ethics that is grounded in a practical understanding of the character of moral claims regarding the natural world. We offer the results of an empirical study of environmental ethics held by the public to illustrate the diversity in their moral commitments to nature. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of this ethical pluralism for policy discussions about the management of American public lands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-206
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Ethics
Volume21
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
decision making
environmental ethics
policy
public
Democracy
Pluralism
Environmental Ethics
Nature
Pragmatism
land
environmental problem solving
Public Deliberation
Environmental Problems
Environmental philosophy
Human Nature
Decision Making
Axiology
Ethical Pluralism
Legitimacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Pragmatism in environmental ethics : Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature. / Minteer, Ben; Manning, Robert E.

In: Environmental Ethics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 06.1999, p. 191-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9773a19950ff4925a3b45282c21e99d6,
title = "Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature",
abstract = "A growing number of contributors to environmental philosophy are beginning to rethink the field's mission and practice. Noting that the emphasis of protracted conceptual battles over axiology may not get us very far in solving environmental problems, many environmental ethicists have begun to advocate a more pragmatic, pluralistic, and policy-based approach in philosophical discussions about human-nature relationships. In this paper, we argue for the legitimacy of this approach, stressing that public deliberation and debate over alternative environmental ethics is necessary for a culture of democracy to be upheld in decision making and policy formulation. Then we argue for a democratically tempered environmental ethics that is grounded in a practical understanding of the character of moral claims regarding the natural world. We offer the results of an empirical study of environmental ethics held by the public to illustrate the diversity in their moral commitments to nature. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of this ethical pluralism for policy discussions about the management of American public lands.",
author = "Ben Minteer and Manning, {Robert E.}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "191--206",
journal = "Environmental Ethics",
issn = "0163-4275",
publisher = "Environmental Philosophy Inc",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatism in environmental ethics

T2 - Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature

AU - Minteer, Ben

AU - Manning, Robert E.

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - A growing number of contributors to environmental philosophy are beginning to rethink the field's mission and practice. Noting that the emphasis of protracted conceptual battles over axiology may not get us very far in solving environmental problems, many environmental ethicists have begun to advocate a more pragmatic, pluralistic, and policy-based approach in philosophical discussions about human-nature relationships. In this paper, we argue for the legitimacy of this approach, stressing that public deliberation and debate over alternative environmental ethics is necessary for a culture of democracy to be upheld in decision making and policy formulation. Then we argue for a democratically tempered environmental ethics that is grounded in a practical understanding of the character of moral claims regarding the natural world. We offer the results of an empirical study of environmental ethics held by the public to illustrate the diversity in their moral commitments to nature. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of this ethical pluralism for policy discussions about the management of American public lands.

AB - A growing number of contributors to environmental philosophy are beginning to rethink the field's mission and practice. Noting that the emphasis of protracted conceptual battles over axiology may not get us very far in solving environmental problems, many environmental ethicists have begun to advocate a more pragmatic, pluralistic, and policy-based approach in philosophical discussions about human-nature relationships. In this paper, we argue for the legitimacy of this approach, stressing that public deliberation and debate over alternative environmental ethics is necessary for a culture of democracy to be upheld in decision making and policy formulation. Then we argue for a democratically tempered environmental ethics that is grounded in a practical understanding of the character of moral claims regarding the natural world. We offer the results of an empirical study of environmental ethics held by the public to illustrate the diversity in their moral commitments to nature. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the implications of this ethical pluralism for policy discussions about the management of American public lands.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001171616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001171616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001171616

VL - 21

SP - 191

EP - 206

JO - Environmental Ethics

JF - Environmental Ethics

SN - 0163-4275

IS - 2

ER -