Potential Unintended Consequences of the Movement Toward Forensic Laboratory Independence

Edward Maguire, William R. King, William Wells, Charles Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The scholarly literature identifies two types of errors of justice: errors of due process and errors of impunity. Errors of due process involve failing to protect the innocent from becoming ensnared in the criminal justice process or imposing excessive sanctions on offenders. Errors of impunity involve failing to sanction, or imposing insufficient sanctions, on culpable offenders. The great challenge in designing criminal justice systems is balancing these two types of errors. We contend that the National Research Council’s recent recommendation to remove crime laboratories from law enforcement agencies in the United States focuses too heavily on avoiding one type of error while largely ignoring the other. We believe that heeding this recommendation without appropriate caution might produce an imbalance that generates serious unintended consequences. We draw on recent studies of how crime labs and law enforcement agencies process sexual assault kits and ballistic evidence to illustrate the potential unintended consequences of separating crime labs from law enforcement agencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-292
Number of pages21
JournalPolice Quarterly
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 28 2015

Fingerprint

law enforcement
sanction
justice
offense
offender
assault
evidence

Keywords

  • crime laboratories
  • criminal investigation
  • errors of justice
  • forensic science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Cite this

Potential Unintended Consequences of the Movement Toward Forensic Laboratory Independence. / Maguire, Edward; King, William R.; Wells, William; Katz, Charles.

In: Police Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, 28.09.2015, p. 272-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40d8f4410fd042ba896c07900456b1a9,
title = "Potential Unintended Consequences of the Movement Toward Forensic Laboratory Independence",
abstract = "The scholarly literature identifies two types of errors of justice: errors of due process and errors of impunity. Errors of due process involve failing to protect the innocent from becoming ensnared in the criminal justice process or imposing excessive sanctions on offenders. Errors of impunity involve failing to sanction, or imposing insufficient sanctions, on culpable offenders. The great challenge in designing criminal justice systems is balancing these two types of errors. We contend that the National Research Council’s recent recommendation to remove crime laboratories from law enforcement agencies in the United States focuses too heavily on avoiding one type of error while largely ignoring the other. We believe that heeding this recommendation without appropriate caution might produce an imbalance that generates serious unintended consequences. We draw on recent studies of how crime labs and law enforcement agencies process sexual assault kits and ballistic evidence to illustrate the potential unintended consequences of separating crime labs from law enforcement agencies.",
keywords = "crime laboratories, criminal investigation, errors of justice, forensic science",
author = "Edward Maguire and King, {William R.} and William Wells and Charles Katz",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1177/1098611115577679",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "272--292",
journal = "Police Quarterly",
issn = "1098-6111",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential Unintended Consequences of the Movement Toward Forensic Laboratory Independence

AU - Maguire, Edward

AU - King, William R.

AU - Wells, William

AU - Katz, Charles

PY - 2015/9/28

Y1 - 2015/9/28

N2 - The scholarly literature identifies two types of errors of justice: errors of due process and errors of impunity. Errors of due process involve failing to protect the innocent from becoming ensnared in the criminal justice process or imposing excessive sanctions on offenders. Errors of impunity involve failing to sanction, or imposing insufficient sanctions, on culpable offenders. The great challenge in designing criminal justice systems is balancing these two types of errors. We contend that the National Research Council’s recent recommendation to remove crime laboratories from law enforcement agencies in the United States focuses too heavily on avoiding one type of error while largely ignoring the other. We believe that heeding this recommendation without appropriate caution might produce an imbalance that generates serious unintended consequences. We draw on recent studies of how crime labs and law enforcement agencies process sexual assault kits and ballistic evidence to illustrate the potential unintended consequences of separating crime labs from law enforcement agencies.

AB - The scholarly literature identifies two types of errors of justice: errors of due process and errors of impunity. Errors of due process involve failing to protect the innocent from becoming ensnared in the criminal justice process or imposing excessive sanctions on offenders. Errors of impunity involve failing to sanction, or imposing insufficient sanctions, on culpable offenders. The great challenge in designing criminal justice systems is balancing these two types of errors. We contend that the National Research Council’s recent recommendation to remove crime laboratories from law enforcement agencies in the United States focuses too heavily on avoiding one type of error while largely ignoring the other. We believe that heeding this recommendation without appropriate caution might produce an imbalance that generates serious unintended consequences. We draw on recent studies of how crime labs and law enforcement agencies process sexual assault kits and ballistic evidence to illustrate the potential unintended consequences of separating crime labs from law enforcement agencies.

KW - crime laboratories

KW - criminal investigation

KW - errors of justice

KW - forensic science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938269131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938269131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098611115577679

DO - 10.1177/1098611115577679

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938269131

VL - 18

SP - 272

EP - 292

JO - Police Quarterly

JF - Police Quarterly

SN - 1098-6111

IS - 3

ER -