Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments

Margaret E. Andrew, Michael A. Wulder, Trisalyn Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecological and conservation research has provided a strong scientific underpinning to the modeling of ecosystem services (ESs) over space and time, by identifying the ecological processes and components of biodiversity (ecosystem service providers, functional traits) that drive ES supply. Despite this knowledge, efforts to map the distribution of ESs often rely on simple spatial surrogates that provide incomplete and non-mechanistic representations of the biophysical variables they are intended to proxy. However, alternative data sets are available that allow for more direct, spatially nuanced inputs to ES mapping efforts. Many spatially explicit, quantitative estimates of biophysical parameters are currently supported by remote sensing, with great relevance to ES mapping. Additional parameters that are not amenable to direct detection by remote sensing may be indirectly modeled with spatial environmental data layers. We review the capabilities of modern remote sensing for describing biodiversity, plant traits, vegetation condition, ecological processes, soil properties, and hydrological variables and highlight how these products may contribute to ES assessments. Because these products often provide more direct estimates of the ecological properties controlling ESs than the spatial proxies currently in use, they can support greater mechanistic realism in models of ESs. By drawing on the increasing range of remote sensing instruments and measurements, data sets appropriate to the estimation of a given ES can be selected or developed. In so doing, we anticipate rapid progress to the spatial characterization of ecosystem services, in turn supporting ecological conservation, management, and integrated land use planning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)328-353
Number of pages26
JournalProgress in Physical Geography
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
remote sensing
biodiversity
conservation
conservation management
realism
land use planning
service provider
land use
soil property
supply
planning
vegetation
management

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem function
  • ecosystem processes
  • ecosystem services
  • functional traits
  • hyperspectral
  • Landsat
  • landscape functions
  • LiDAR
  • MODIS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments. / Andrew, Margaret E.; Wulder, Michael A.; Nelson, Trisalyn.

In: Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2014, p. 328-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Andrew, Margaret E. ; Wulder, Michael A. ; Nelson, Trisalyn. / Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments. In: Progress in Physical Geography. 2014 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 328-353.
@article{f58f1bc27c814bc4b6bdf09b2f502120,
title = "Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments",
abstract = "Ecological and conservation research has provided a strong scientific underpinning to the modeling of ecosystem services (ESs) over space and time, by identifying the ecological processes and components of biodiversity (ecosystem service providers, functional traits) that drive ES supply. Despite this knowledge, efforts to map the distribution of ESs often rely on simple spatial surrogates that provide incomplete and non-mechanistic representations of the biophysical variables they are intended to proxy. However, alternative data sets are available that allow for more direct, spatially nuanced inputs to ES mapping efforts. Many spatially explicit, quantitative estimates of biophysical parameters are currently supported by remote sensing, with great relevance to ES mapping. Additional parameters that are not amenable to direct detection by remote sensing may be indirectly modeled with spatial environmental data layers. We review the capabilities of modern remote sensing for describing biodiversity, plant traits, vegetation condition, ecological processes, soil properties, and hydrological variables and highlight how these products may contribute to ES assessments. Because these products often provide more direct estimates of the ecological properties controlling ESs than the spatial proxies currently in use, they can support greater mechanistic realism in models of ESs. By drawing on the increasing range of remote sensing instruments and measurements, data sets appropriate to the estimation of a given ES can be selected or developed. In so doing, we anticipate rapid progress to the spatial characterization of ecosystem services, in turn supporting ecological conservation, management, and integrated land use planning.",
keywords = "biodiversity, ecosystem function, ecosystem processes, ecosystem services, functional traits, hyperspectral, Landsat, landscape functions, LiDAR, MODIS",
author = "Andrew, {Margaret E.} and Wulder, {Michael A.} and Trisalyn Nelson",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0309133314528942",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "328--353",
journal = "Progress in Physical Geography",
issn = "0309-1333",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments

AU - Andrew, Margaret E.

AU - Wulder, Michael A.

AU - Nelson, Trisalyn

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Ecological and conservation research has provided a strong scientific underpinning to the modeling of ecosystem services (ESs) over space and time, by identifying the ecological processes and components of biodiversity (ecosystem service providers, functional traits) that drive ES supply. Despite this knowledge, efforts to map the distribution of ESs often rely on simple spatial surrogates that provide incomplete and non-mechanistic representations of the biophysical variables they are intended to proxy. However, alternative data sets are available that allow for more direct, spatially nuanced inputs to ES mapping efforts. Many spatially explicit, quantitative estimates of biophysical parameters are currently supported by remote sensing, with great relevance to ES mapping. Additional parameters that are not amenable to direct detection by remote sensing may be indirectly modeled with spatial environmental data layers. We review the capabilities of modern remote sensing for describing biodiversity, plant traits, vegetation condition, ecological processes, soil properties, and hydrological variables and highlight how these products may contribute to ES assessments. Because these products often provide more direct estimates of the ecological properties controlling ESs than the spatial proxies currently in use, they can support greater mechanistic realism in models of ESs. By drawing on the increasing range of remote sensing instruments and measurements, data sets appropriate to the estimation of a given ES can be selected or developed. In so doing, we anticipate rapid progress to the spatial characterization of ecosystem services, in turn supporting ecological conservation, management, and integrated land use planning.

AB - Ecological and conservation research has provided a strong scientific underpinning to the modeling of ecosystem services (ESs) over space and time, by identifying the ecological processes and components of biodiversity (ecosystem service providers, functional traits) that drive ES supply. Despite this knowledge, efforts to map the distribution of ESs often rely on simple spatial surrogates that provide incomplete and non-mechanistic representations of the biophysical variables they are intended to proxy. However, alternative data sets are available that allow for more direct, spatially nuanced inputs to ES mapping efforts. Many spatially explicit, quantitative estimates of biophysical parameters are currently supported by remote sensing, with great relevance to ES mapping. Additional parameters that are not amenable to direct detection by remote sensing may be indirectly modeled with spatial environmental data layers. We review the capabilities of modern remote sensing for describing biodiversity, plant traits, vegetation condition, ecological processes, soil properties, and hydrological variables and highlight how these products may contribute to ES assessments. Because these products often provide more direct estimates of the ecological properties controlling ESs than the spatial proxies currently in use, they can support greater mechanistic realism in models of ESs. By drawing on the increasing range of remote sensing instruments and measurements, data sets appropriate to the estimation of a given ES can be selected or developed. In so doing, we anticipate rapid progress to the spatial characterization of ecosystem services, in turn supporting ecological conservation, management, and integrated land use planning.

KW - biodiversity

KW - ecosystem function

KW - ecosystem processes

KW - ecosystem services

KW - functional traits

KW - hyperspectral

KW - Landsat

KW - landscape functions

KW - LiDAR

KW - MODIS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902180821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902180821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0309133314528942

DO - 10.1177/0309133314528942

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84902180821

VL - 38

SP - 328

EP - 353

JO - Progress in Physical Geography

JF - Progress in Physical Geography

SN - 0309-1333

IS - 3

ER -