Abstract

We suggest that the introduction of positive assortment (the pairing of individuals with similar characteristics) to the peer review process would increase the speed of reviewing, improve the quality of reviews, and decrease the burden on reviewers. In assortative reviewing, each reviewer is given a score based on speed of reviewing, the usefulness of the review, the rate of reviewing, or any other priority of the journal editor. Authors submitting manuscripts are then paired with reviewers who have similar scores to themselves. This is a no-cost solution that aligns reviewers' incentives by accounting for the benefits provided to the scientific community and returning them in kind. This assortative reviewing system can promote rapid, high quality, and high volume reviewing at a benefit to the scientific community at no financial cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-450
Number of pages3
JournalAdaptive Behavior
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Costs and Cost Analysis
Manuscripts
Motivation

Keywords

  • assortative reviewing
  • cooperation
  • public goods
  • Social dilemma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Positive assortment for peer review. / Aktipis, C Athena; Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.

In: Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 18, No. 5, 10.2010, p. 448-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aktipis, C Athena ; Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. / Positive assortment for peer review. In: Adaptive Behavior. 2010 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 448-450.
@article{1257f4247f6d40f89e5d5c3d295c52c4,
title = "Positive assortment for peer review",
abstract = "We suggest that the introduction of positive assortment (the pairing of individuals with similar characteristics) to the peer review process would increase the speed of reviewing, improve the quality of reviews, and decrease the burden on reviewers. In assortative reviewing, each reviewer is given a score based on speed of reviewing, the usefulness of the review, the rate of reviewing, or any other priority of the journal editor. Authors submitting manuscripts are then paired with reviewers who have similar scores to themselves. This is a no-cost solution that aligns reviewers' incentives by accounting for the benefits provided to the scientific community and returning them in kind. This assortative reviewing system can promote rapid, high quality, and high volume reviewing at a benefit to the scientific community at no financial cost.",
keywords = "assortative reviewing, cooperation, public goods, Social dilemma",
author = "Aktipis, {C Athena} and Thompson-Schill, {Sharon L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1177/1059712310384281",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "448--450",
journal = "Adaptive Behavior",
issn = "1059-7123",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Positive assortment for peer review

AU - Aktipis, C Athena

AU - Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - We suggest that the introduction of positive assortment (the pairing of individuals with similar characteristics) to the peer review process would increase the speed of reviewing, improve the quality of reviews, and decrease the burden on reviewers. In assortative reviewing, each reviewer is given a score based on speed of reviewing, the usefulness of the review, the rate of reviewing, or any other priority of the journal editor. Authors submitting manuscripts are then paired with reviewers who have similar scores to themselves. This is a no-cost solution that aligns reviewers' incentives by accounting for the benefits provided to the scientific community and returning them in kind. This assortative reviewing system can promote rapid, high quality, and high volume reviewing at a benefit to the scientific community at no financial cost.

AB - We suggest that the introduction of positive assortment (the pairing of individuals with similar characteristics) to the peer review process would increase the speed of reviewing, improve the quality of reviews, and decrease the burden on reviewers. In assortative reviewing, each reviewer is given a score based on speed of reviewing, the usefulness of the review, the rate of reviewing, or any other priority of the journal editor. Authors submitting manuscripts are then paired with reviewers who have similar scores to themselves. This is a no-cost solution that aligns reviewers' incentives by accounting for the benefits provided to the scientific community and returning them in kind. This assortative reviewing system can promote rapid, high quality, and high volume reviewing at a benefit to the scientific community at no financial cost.

KW - assortative reviewing

KW - cooperation

KW - public goods

KW - Social dilemma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449283207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449283207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1059712310384281

DO - 10.1177/1059712310384281

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 448

EP - 450

JO - Adaptive Behavior

JF - Adaptive Behavior

SN - 1059-7123

IS - 5

ER -