Abstract
We suggest that the introduction of positive assortment (the pairing of individuals with similar characteristics) to the peer review process would increase the speed of reviewing, improve the quality of reviews, and decrease the burden on reviewers. In assortative reviewing, each reviewer is given a score based on speed of reviewing, the usefulness of the review, the rate of reviewing, or any other priority of the journal editor. Authors submitting manuscripts are then paired with reviewers who have similar scores to themselves. This is a no-cost solution that aligns reviewers' incentives by accounting for the benefits provided to the scientific community and returning them in kind. This assortative reviewing system can promote rapid, high quality, and high volume reviewing at a benefit to the scientific community at no financial cost.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 448-450 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Adaptive Behavior |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2010 |
Keywords
- Social dilemma
- assortative reviewing
- cooperation
- public goods
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Neuroscience