Population shift bias in tests of space-time interaction

Elizabeth Mack, Nicholas Malizia, Sergio J. Rey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Common to all tests of space-time interaction is the assumption that the population underlying the events of interest exhibits a trajectory of growth that is consistent through time and across space. In practice, however, this assumption is often untenable and, when violated, can introduce population shift bias into the results of these tests. While this problem is widely recognized, more work remains to compare its effect across tests and to determine the extent to which it is a problem for study short periods. This paper quantifies and compares the population shift bias present in the results of the Knox, Mantel, and Jacquez tests of space-time interaction. A simulation study is carried out which quantifies the bias present in each test across a variety of population movement scenarios. Results show a positive relationship between population shift bias and the heterogeneity in population growth across all the tests. They also demonstrate variability in the size of the bias across the three tests for space-time interaction considered. Finally, the results illustrate that population shift bias can be a serious problem for short study periods. Collectively, these findings suggest that an unbiased approach to assessing the significance of space-time interaction test results is needed whenever spatially heterogeneous population change is identified within a study area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)500-512
Number of pages13
JournalComputers, Environment and Urban Systems
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

trend
interaction
time
test
present
population development
population growth
trajectory
scenario
simulation
event

Keywords

  • Jacquez test
  • Knox test
  • Mantel test
  • Population shift bias
  • Space-time interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Population shift bias in tests of space-time interaction. / Mack, Elizabeth; Malizia, Nicholas; Rey, Sergio J.

In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 36, No. 6, 11.2012, p. 500-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mack, Elizabeth ; Malizia, Nicholas ; Rey, Sergio J. / Population shift bias in tests of space-time interaction. In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2012 ; Vol. 36, No. 6. pp. 500-512.
@article{b3461a7ca9af4b21a9805bda97d0423a,
title = "Population shift bias in tests of space-time interaction",
abstract = "Common to all tests of space-time interaction is the assumption that the population underlying the events of interest exhibits a trajectory of growth that is consistent through time and across space. In practice, however, this assumption is often untenable and, when violated, can introduce population shift bias into the results of these tests. While this problem is widely recognized, more work remains to compare its effect across tests and to determine the extent to which it is a problem for study short periods. This paper quantifies and compares the population shift bias present in the results of the Knox, Mantel, and Jacquez tests of space-time interaction. A simulation study is carried out which quantifies the bias present in each test across a variety of population movement scenarios. Results show a positive relationship between population shift bias and the heterogeneity in population growth across all the tests. They also demonstrate variability in the size of the bias across the three tests for space-time interaction considered. Finally, the results illustrate that population shift bias can be a serious problem for short study periods. Collectively, these findings suggest that an unbiased approach to assessing the significance of space-time interaction test results is needed whenever spatially heterogeneous population change is identified within a study area.",
keywords = "Jacquez test, Knox test, Mantel test, Population shift bias, Space-time interaction",
author = "Elizabeth Mack and Nicholas Malizia and Rey, {Sergio J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.05.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "500--512",
journal = "Computers, Environment and Urban Systems",
issn = "0198-9715",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population shift bias in tests of space-time interaction

AU - Mack, Elizabeth

AU - Malizia, Nicholas

AU - Rey, Sergio J.

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Common to all tests of space-time interaction is the assumption that the population underlying the events of interest exhibits a trajectory of growth that is consistent through time and across space. In practice, however, this assumption is often untenable and, when violated, can introduce population shift bias into the results of these tests. While this problem is widely recognized, more work remains to compare its effect across tests and to determine the extent to which it is a problem for study short periods. This paper quantifies and compares the population shift bias present in the results of the Knox, Mantel, and Jacquez tests of space-time interaction. A simulation study is carried out which quantifies the bias present in each test across a variety of population movement scenarios. Results show a positive relationship between population shift bias and the heterogeneity in population growth across all the tests. They also demonstrate variability in the size of the bias across the three tests for space-time interaction considered. Finally, the results illustrate that population shift bias can be a serious problem for short study periods. Collectively, these findings suggest that an unbiased approach to assessing the significance of space-time interaction test results is needed whenever spatially heterogeneous population change is identified within a study area.

AB - Common to all tests of space-time interaction is the assumption that the population underlying the events of interest exhibits a trajectory of growth that is consistent through time and across space. In practice, however, this assumption is often untenable and, when violated, can introduce population shift bias into the results of these tests. While this problem is widely recognized, more work remains to compare its effect across tests and to determine the extent to which it is a problem for study short periods. This paper quantifies and compares the population shift bias present in the results of the Knox, Mantel, and Jacquez tests of space-time interaction. A simulation study is carried out which quantifies the bias present in each test across a variety of population movement scenarios. Results show a positive relationship between population shift bias and the heterogeneity in population growth across all the tests. They also demonstrate variability in the size of the bias across the three tests for space-time interaction considered. Finally, the results illustrate that population shift bias can be a serious problem for short study periods. Collectively, these findings suggest that an unbiased approach to assessing the significance of space-time interaction test results is needed whenever spatially heterogeneous population change is identified within a study area.

KW - Jacquez test

KW - Knox test

KW - Mantel test

KW - Population shift bias

KW - Space-time interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869875175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869875175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 500

EP - 512

JO - Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

JF - Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

SN - 0198-9715

IS - 6

ER -