Population differences in the relationship between height, weight, and adiposity: An application of Burton's model

Daniel Hruschka, Elaine C. Rush, Alexandra Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study of human variation in adiposity and lean mass is important for understanding core processes in human evolution, and is increasingly a public health concern as the "obesity epidemic" expands globally. The dominant measure of population differences in adiposity is Body Mass Index (BMI), which suffers from systematic biases across populations due to variation in the relationship between true body fat, height and weight. Here we develop simplified corrections for such anthropometric-based measures of adiposity that can take into account this population variation. These corrections derive from a recent model proposed by Burton that assumes humans accrue mass in two ways - growth in height that adds bone and muscle, and growth in body fat and the ancillary fat-free mass (FFM) needed to support this additional body fat. We analyze two ethnically diverse datasets with dual X-ray absorptiometry-measured (DXA) fat mass, assessing the fit of Burton's model and deriving novel corrections based on estimated musculoskeletal slenderness. The resulting model provides excellent fit to fat mass within populations (average R2 = 0.92 for women and R2 = 0.83 for men). World populations differ dramatically in musculoskeletal slenderness (up to a difference of 4.4 kg/m 2), as do men and women (differences of 3.3-4.5 kg/m2), leading to clear population corrections. These findings point to a conceptually straightforward tool for estimating true differences in adiposity across populations, and suggest an alternative to BMI that provides a more accurate and theoretically based estimate of body fat than that traditionally derived from height and weight measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-76
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume151
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Adiposity
Weights and Measures
Adipose Tissue
Population
Fats
Body Mass Index
world population
Body Height
Bone Development
Photon Absorptiometry
public health
Public Health
Obesity
Body Weight
Muscles
trend
Growth

Keywords

  • adiposity
  • body mass index
  • ethnicity
  • fat mass
  • height
  • human energetics
  • measurement
  • obesity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Anatomy

Cite this

Population differences in the relationship between height, weight, and adiposity : An application of Burton's model. / Hruschka, Daniel; Rush, Elaine C.; Slade, Alexandra.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 151, No. 1, 05.2013, p. 68-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c1e86a25627438bb91a702b5c4c24c2,
title = "Population differences in the relationship between height, weight, and adiposity: An application of Burton's model",
abstract = "The study of human variation in adiposity and lean mass is important for understanding core processes in human evolution, and is increasingly a public health concern as the {"}obesity epidemic{"} expands globally. The dominant measure of population differences in adiposity is Body Mass Index (BMI), which suffers from systematic biases across populations due to variation in the relationship between true body fat, height and weight. Here we develop simplified corrections for such anthropometric-based measures of adiposity that can take into account this population variation. These corrections derive from a recent model proposed by Burton that assumes humans accrue mass in two ways - growth in height that adds bone and muscle, and growth in body fat and the ancillary fat-free mass (FFM) needed to support this additional body fat. We analyze two ethnically diverse datasets with dual X-ray absorptiometry-measured (DXA) fat mass, assessing the fit of Burton's model and deriving novel corrections based on estimated musculoskeletal slenderness. The resulting model provides excellent fit to fat mass within populations (average R2 = 0.92 for women and R2 = 0.83 for men). World populations differ dramatically in musculoskeletal slenderness (up to a difference of 4.4 kg/m 2), as do men and women (differences of 3.3-4.5 kg/m2), leading to clear population corrections. These findings point to a conceptually straightforward tool for estimating true differences in adiposity across populations, and suggest an alternative to BMI that provides a more accurate and theoretically based estimate of body fat than that traditionally derived from height and weight measures.",
keywords = "adiposity, body mass index, ethnicity, fat mass, height, human energetics, measurement, obesity",
author = "Daniel Hruschka and Rush, {Elaine C.} and Alexandra Slade",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.22258",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "68--76",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population differences in the relationship between height, weight, and adiposity

T2 - An application of Burton's model

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

AU - Rush, Elaine C.

AU - Slade, Alexandra

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - The study of human variation in adiposity and lean mass is important for understanding core processes in human evolution, and is increasingly a public health concern as the "obesity epidemic" expands globally. The dominant measure of population differences in adiposity is Body Mass Index (BMI), which suffers from systematic biases across populations due to variation in the relationship between true body fat, height and weight. Here we develop simplified corrections for such anthropometric-based measures of adiposity that can take into account this population variation. These corrections derive from a recent model proposed by Burton that assumes humans accrue mass in two ways - growth in height that adds bone and muscle, and growth in body fat and the ancillary fat-free mass (FFM) needed to support this additional body fat. We analyze two ethnically diverse datasets with dual X-ray absorptiometry-measured (DXA) fat mass, assessing the fit of Burton's model and deriving novel corrections based on estimated musculoskeletal slenderness. The resulting model provides excellent fit to fat mass within populations (average R2 = 0.92 for women and R2 = 0.83 for men). World populations differ dramatically in musculoskeletal slenderness (up to a difference of 4.4 kg/m 2), as do men and women (differences of 3.3-4.5 kg/m2), leading to clear population corrections. These findings point to a conceptually straightforward tool for estimating true differences in adiposity across populations, and suggest an alternative to BMI that provides a more accurate and theoretically based estimate of body fat than that traditionally derived from height and weight measures.

AB - The study of human variation in adiposity and lean mass is important for understanding core processes in human evolution, and is increasingly a public health concern as the "obesity epidemic" expands globally. The dominant measure of population differences in adiposity is Body Mass Index (BMI), which suffers from systematic biases across populations due to variation in the relationship between true body fat, height and weight. Here we develop simplified corrections for such anthropometric-based measures of adiposity that can take into account this population variation. These corrections derive from a recent model proposed by Burton that assumes humans accrue mass in two ways - growth in height that adds bone and muscle, and growth in body fat and the ancillary fat-free mass (FFM) needed to support this additional body fat. We analyze two ethnically diverse datasets with dual X-ray absorptiometry-measured (DXA) fat mass, assessing the fit of Burton's model and deriving novel corrections based on estimated musculoskeletal slenderness. The resulting model provides excellent fit to fat mass within populations (average R2 = 0.92 for women and R2 = 0.83 for men). World populations differ dramatically in musculoskeletal slenderness (up to a difference of 4.4 kg/m 2), as do men and women (differences of 3.3-4.5 kg/m2), leading to clear population corrections. These findings point to a conceptually straightforward tool for estimating true differences in adiposity across populations, and suggest an alternative to BMI that provides a more accurate and theoretically based estimate of body fat than that traditionally derived from height and weight measures.

KW - adiposity

KW - body mass index

KW - ethnicity

KW - fat mass

KW - height

KW - human energetics

KW - measurement

KW - obesity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876488150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876488150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.22258

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.22258

M3 - Article

C2 - 23553559

AN - SCOPUS:84876488150

VL - 151

SP - 68

EP - 76

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 1

ER -