Popular, controversial, neglected, and rejected adolescent. Contrasts of social competence and achievement differences

Carol Frentz, Frank M. Gresham, Stephen N. Elliott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using a relatively well established sociometric classification procedure (Coie, Dodge, & Coppotelli, Developmental Psychology, 18: 557-570, 1982), social competence and achievement differences among 331 popular, controversial, neglected, or rejected adolescents in Grades 6-10 were investigated. Comparisons were made from teachers' and self-report judgments of social skills, behavior problems, and academic achievement. Significant differences and trends in the data were consistent with past studies that have indicated that popular children display more socially skilled behaviors and fewer behavior problems than rejected children. No differences in teacher-rated social skills, problem behaviors, or academic achievement were found between popular, controversial, and neglected groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-120
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of School Psychology
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Popular, controversial, neglected, and rejected adolescent. Contrasts of social competence and achievement differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this