Politics or Professionalism? Budgeting for Bilingual Education

Carla M. Flink, Angel Molina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What drives budgetary support for minority-targeted policies? This question is increasingly salient because the public sector serves numerous minority clientele. One perspective suggests that budgetary decisions are grounded in need or demand, while another contends that political pressures will result in the allocation of resources to those with political power. This article presents a theory of budgetary allocation based on the interaction between politics and professionalism, two seemingly disparate perspectives. Furthermore, we separate professionalism into two dimensions—demand and need. Through an analysis of budgeting decisions for bilingual education, we find that political representation leads to more positive budgetary changes for low-demand and, conversely, high-need environments. These findings support not only the interaction between politics and professionalism as a driver of budgetary outcomes but also the theory of two dimensions of professionalism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1064-1087
Number of pages24
JournalUrban Affairs Review
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

bilingual education
politics
education
political power
minority policy
public sector
demand
interaction
driver
minority
resource
professionalism
need
resources
decision
allocation

Keywords

  • minority administrators
  • minority politics
  • public budgeting
  • representation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Politics or Professionalism? Budgeting for Bilingual Education. / Flink, Carla M.; Molina, Angel.

In: Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 53, No. 6, 01.11.2017, p. 1064-1087.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a05af0ae6821484684f9c40a0af00dbe,
title = "Politics or Professionalism? Budgeting for Bilingual Education",
abstract = "What drives budgetary support for minority-targeted policies? This question is increasingly salient because the public sector serves numerous minority clientele. One perspective suggests that budgetary decisions are grounded in need or demand, while another contends that political pressures will result in the allocation of resources to those with political power. This article presents a theory of budgetary allocation based on the interaction between politics and professionalism, two seemingly disparate perspectives. Furthermore, we separate professionalism into two dimensions—demand and need. Through an analysis of budgeting decisions for bilingual education, we find that political representation leads to more positive budgetary changes for low-demand and, conversely, high-need environments. These findings support not only the interaction between politics and professionalism as a driver of budgetary outcomes but also the theory of two dimensions of professionalism.",
keywords = "minority administrators, minority politics, public budgeting, representation",
author = "Flink, {Carla M.} and Angel Molina",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1078087416652732",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "1064--1087",
journal = "Urban Affairs Review",
issn = "1078-0874",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politics or Professionalism? Budgeting for Bilingual Education

AU - Flink, Carla M.

AU - Molina, Angel

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - What drives budgetary support for minority-targeted policies? This question is increasingly salient because the public sector serves numerous minority clientele. One perspective suggests that budgetary decisions are grounded in need or demand, while another contends that political pressures will result in the allocation of resources to those with political power. This article presents a theory of budgetary allocation based on the interaction between politics and professionalism, two seemingly disparate perspectives. Furthermore, we separate professionalism into two dimensions—demand and need. Through an analysis of budgeting decisions for bilingual education, we find that political representation leads to more positive budgetary changes for low-demand and, conversely, high-need environments. These findings support not only the interaction between politics and professionalism as a driver of budgetary outcomes but also the theory of two dimensions of professionalism.

AB - What drives budgetary support for minority-targeted policies? This question is increasingly salient because the public sector serves numerous minority clientele. One perspective suggests that budgetary decisions are grounded in need or demand, while another contends that political pressures will result in the allocation of resources to those with political power. This article presents a theory of budgetary allocation based on the interaction between politics and professionalism, two seemingly disparate perspectives. Furthermore, we separate professionalism into two dimensions—demand and need. Through an analysis of budgeting decisions for bilingual education, we find that political representation leads to more positive budgetary changes for low-demand and, conversely, high-need environments. These findings support not only the interaction between politics and professionalism as a driver of budgetary outcomes but also the theory of two dimensions of professionalism.

KW - minority administrators

KW - minority politics

KW - public budgeting

KW - representation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031798800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031798800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1078087416652732

DO - 10.1177/1078087416652732

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85031798800

VL - 53

SP - 1064

EP - 1087

JO - Urban Affairs Review

JF - Urban Affairs Review

SN - 1078-0874

IS - 6

ER -