Political tolerance hypotheses and white opposition to a Martin Luther King holiday in Arizona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On November 2, 1983, President Reagan signed into law national legislation designating the third Monday in January a national holiday in memory of Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK). At the end of 1992, except for New Hampshire that had a Civil Rights Day that did not mention MLK specifically, every state and the District of Columbia (including the U.S. territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands) had established some form of a MLK holiday. However, only Arizona voters decided the holiday issue via a statewide ballot initiative. Voters finally approved an initiative in 1992 after rejecting a similar one in 1990. Rejection of the 1990 proposal evoked national condemnation and provoked sanctions from organizations ranging from the National Football League to the National League of Cities. While the white community provided excuses, the black community reacted with charges of racism. Building on the traditional literature which links white contributions to black political gains to white political tolerance, this study explores the extent to which data gathered from white voters on the holiday support hypotheses drawn from the political tolerance model. Analysis indicate results that conform to the expectations of the model. Less educated, older, politically conservative, LDS, and rural white Arizonas are less likely to voice approval for such a holiday.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalThe Social Science Journal
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Holidays
holiday
tolerance
opposition
Guam
Racism
Puerto Rico
Civil Rights
Football
Caribbean Region
civil rights
Legislation
Islands
sanction
racism
community
president
legislation
Organizations
district

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Political tolerance hypotheses and white opposition to a Martin Luther King holiday in Arizona. / Alozie, Nicholas.

In: The Social Science Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1995, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c81d25990f9942bf9ef9bdf07845fa3b,
title = "Political tolerance hypotheses and white opposition to a Martin Luther King holiday in Arizona",
abstract = "On November 2, 1983, President Reagan signed into law national legislation designating the third Monday in January a national holiday in memory of Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK). At the end of 1992, except for New Hampshire that had a Civil Rights Day that did not mention MLK specifically, every state and the District of Columbia (including the U.S. territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands) had established some form of a MLK holiday. However, only Arizona voters decided the holiday issue via a statewide ballot initiative. Voters finally approved an initiative in 1992 after rejecting a similar one in 1990. Rejection of the 1990 proposal evoked national condemnation and provoked sanctions from organizations ranging from the National Football League to the National League of Cities. While the white community provided excuses, the black community reacted with charges of racism. Building on the traditional literature which links white contributions to black political gains to white political tolerance, this study explores the extent to which data gathered from white voters on the holiday support hypotheses drawn from the political tolerance model. Analysis indicate results that conform to the expectations of the model. Less educated, older, politically conservative, LDS, and rural white Arizonas are less likely to voice approval for such a holiday.",
author = "Nicholas Alozie",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0362-3319(95)90016-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political tolerance hypotheses and white opposition to a Martin Luther King holiday in Arizona

AU - Alozie, Nicholas

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - On November 2, 1983, President Reagan signed into law national legislation designating the third Monday in January a national holiday in memory of Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK). At the end of 1992, except for New Hampshire that had a Civil Rights Day that did not mention MLK specifically, every state and the District of Columbia (including the U.S. territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands) had established some form of a MLK holiday. However, only Arizona voters decided the holiday issue via a statewide ballot initiative. Voters finally approved an initiative in 1992 after rejecting a similar one in 1990. Rejection of the 1990 proposal evoked national condemnation and provoked sanctions from organizations ranging from the National Football League to the National League of Cities. While the white community provided excuses, the black community reacted with charges of racism. Building on the traditional literature which links white contributions to black political gains to white political tolerance, this study explores the extent to which data gathered from white voters on the holiday support hypotheses drawn from the political tolerance model. Analysis indicate results that conform to the expectations of the model. Less educated, older, politically conservative, LDS, and rural white Arizonas are less likely to voice approval for such a holiday.

AB - On November 2, 1983, President Reagan signed into law national legislation designating the third Monday in January a national holiday in memory of Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK). At the end of 1992, except for New Hampshire that had a Civil Rights Day that did not mention MLK specifically, every state and the District of Columbia (including the U.S. territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands) had established some form of a MLK holiday. However, only Arizona voters decided the holiday issue via a statewide ballot initiative. Voters finally approved an initiative in 1992 after rejecting a similar one in 1990. Rejection of the 1990 proposal evoked national condemnation and provoked sanctions from organizations ranging from the National Football League to the National League of Cities. While the white community provided excuses, the black community reacted with charges of racism. Building on the traditional literature which links white contributions to black political gains to white political tolerance, this study explores the extent to which data gathered from white voters on the holiday support hypotheses drawn from the political tolerance model. Analysis indicate results that conform to the expectations of the model. Less educated, older, politically conservative, LDS, and rural white Arizonas are less likely to voice approval for such a holiday.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002538377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002538377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0362-3319(95)90016-0

DO - 10.1016/0362-3319(95)90016-0

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 1

ER -