@inbook{daec569ab82e4a9abac10dd780aa9c73,
title = "Political Effectiveness in Science and Technology",
abstract = "Scientific understanding and technological intervention may provide two different paths for addressing complex social problems. More scientific understanding is commonly prescribed as necessary to guide appropriate policy interventions and behavior. Technologies in contrast may offer a direct solution to a problem that does not demand policy or behavioral change. While solving a problem through better scientific understanding and changed behavior may seem more ethically or operationally satisfying than solving it through appropriate technological intervention, it is also often much more difficult. Drawing on several examples such as childhood vaccines and climate change, I argue that scientific knowledge has a tendency to exacerbate value disputes that impede action, whereas appropriate technological interventions have a capacity to sidestep or resolve such disputes. I end with the suggestion that some notion of pragmatic technological progressivism needs to be resurrected as part of any hopeful agenda for enhancing justice, equality, freedom, and mutual understanding the world.",
keywords = "Climate Impact, Montreal Protocol, Social Vulnerability, Stratospheric Ozone, Teaching Reading",
author = "Daniel Sarewitz",
note = "Funding Information: This chapter strongly draws upon collaborations with Richard Nelson, Helen Ingram, and Anne Schneider, none of whom bear any responsibility for (or even awareness of) the abuses herein. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2011, Springer Science+Business Media B.V.",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_18",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
pages = "301--315",
booktitle = "Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science",
address = "United States",
}