Police Use of Less Lethal Force: Does Administrative Policy Matter?

William Terrill, Eugene A. Paoline

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    67 Scopus citations


    Scholars have long theorized that constraining police officer discretion via organizational policy improves decision-making. Empirically, prior research shows that more restrictive lethal force policies result in a reduction in the number of police shootings and in racial disparity. Yet, researchers have never examined the impact of less lethal force policies in relation to the full spectrum of less lethal force tactics. In addressing this research void, we examine 3,340 use of force incidents from three US agencies, each varying in terms of policy direction and restrictiveness. The results consistently show that officers working within the most restrictive policy framework used force less readily than officers who operated within more permissive policy environments. Hence, police administrators wishing to reduce coercion should consider the potential effect that a more restrictive policy may have on such behavior.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)193-216
    Number of pages24
    JournalJustice Quarterly
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - Feb 23 2017


    • continuum
    • discretion
    • police
    • policy
    • use of force

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
    • Law


    Dive into the research topics of 'Police Use of Less Lethal Force: Does Administrative Policy Matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this