Plumage brightness and breeding-season dominance in the House Finch: A negatively correlated handicap?

Kevin McGraw, Geoffrey E. Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A variety of observations indicate that the carotenoid-based coloration of male House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) is an honest signal of quality. Plumage redness in this species positively reveals male nutritional condition, over-winter survival, and nest attentiveness. As a result, in the breeding season, male House Finches with brighter ornamental plumage are preferred by females as social mates over males with drabber plumage. In the nonbreeding season, however, bright red plumage does not seem to confer an advantage in aggressive interactions, as males with drabber plumage tend to dominate males with brighter plumage. We investigated this apparent paradox by conducting a breeding-season dominance experiment using captive males. We paired unfamiliar males of contrasting plumage brightness in a series of dominance trials during the breeding season and found that drabber males were dominant to brighter males in competition for access to food. Furthermore, in two captive flocks of males, plumage brightness was significantly negatively associated with social dominance. Although we have no conclusive evidence to explain why drab male House Finches are dominant to bright males throughout the year, we believe that motivational asymmetry may contribute to the observed negative correlation between signal intensity and signaler quality ('negatively correlated handicap'). Drab males may be more willing to compete for access to food or to females than are bright males because of the nutritional and/or mating disadvantages from which they suffer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)456-461
Number of pages6
JournalCondor
Volume102
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

plumage
breeding season
dominance (genetics)
Carpodacus mexicanus
social dominance
food
carotenoid
overwintering

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Carpodacus mexicanus
  • House Finch
  • Plumage coloration
  • Social dominance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Plumage brightness and breeding-season dominance in the House Finch : A negatively correlated handicap? / McGraw, Kevin; Hill, Geoffrey E.

In: Condor, Vol. 102, No. 2, 05.2000, p. 456-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9d2e530711354667abeb2780693ea9ab,
title = "Plumage brightness and breeding-season dominance in the House Finch: A negatively correlated handicap?",
abstract = "A variety of observations indicate that the carotenoid-based coloration of male House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) is an honest signal of quality. Plumage redness in this species positively reveals male nutritional condition, over-winter survival, and nest attentiveness. As a result, in the breeding season, male House Finches with brighter ornamental plumage are preferred by females as social mates over males with drabber plumage. In the nonbreeding season, however, bright red plumage does not seem to confer an advantage in aggressive interactions, as males with drabber plumage tend to dominate males with brighter plumage. We investigated this apparent paradox by conducting a breeding-season dominance experiment using captive males. We paired unfamiliar males of contrasting plumage brightness in a series of dominance trials during the breeding season and found that drabber males were dominant to brighter males in competition for access to food. Furthermore, in two captive flocks of males, plumage brightness was significantly negatively associated with social dominance. Although we have no conclusive evidence to explain why drab male House Finches are dominant to bright males throughout the year, we believe that motivational asymmetry may contribute to the observed negative correlation between signal intensity and signaler quality ('negatively correlated handicap'). Drab males may be more willing to compete for access to food or to females than are bright males because of the nutritional and/or mating disadvantages from which they suffer.",
keywords = "Aggression, Carpodacus mexicanus, House Finch, Plumage coloration, Social dominance",
author = "Kevin McGraw and Hill, {Geoffrey E.}",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "456--461",
journal = "Condor",
issn = "0010-5422",
publisher = "American Ornithologist Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plumage brightness and breeding-season dominance in the House Finch

T2 - A negatively correlated handicap?

AU - McGraw, Kevin

AU - Hill, Geoffrey E.

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - A variety of observations indicate that the carotenoid-based coloration of male House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) is an honest signal of quality. Plumage redness in this species positively reveals male nutritional condition, over-winter survival, and nest attentiveness. As a result, in the breeding season, male House Finches with brighter ornamental plumage are preferred by females as social mates over males with drabber plumage. In the nonbreeding season, however, bright red plumage does not seem to confer an advantage in aggressive interactions, as males with drabber plumage tend to dominate males with brighter plumage. We investigated this apparent paradox by conducting a breeding-season dominance experiment using captive males. We paired unfamiliar males of contrasting plumage brightness in a series of dominance trials during the breeding season and found that drabber males were dominant to brighter males in competition for access to food. Furthermore, in two captive flocks of males, plumage brightness was significantly negatively associated with social dominance. Although we have no conclusive evidence to explain why drab male House Finches are dominant to bright males throughout the year, we believe that motivational asymmetry may contribute to the observed negative correlation between signal intensity and signaler quality ('negatively correlated handicap'). Drab males may be more willing to compete for access to food or to females than are bright males because of the nutritional and/or mating disadvantages from which they suffer.

AB - A variety of observations indicate that the carotenoid-based coloration of male House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) is an honest signal of quality. Plumage redness in this species positively reveals male nutritional condition, over-winter survival, and nest attentiveness. As a result, in the breeding season, male House Finches with brighter ornamental plumage are preferred by females as social mates over males with drabber plumage. In the nonbreeding season, however, bright red plumage does not seem to confer an advantage in aggressive interactions, as males with drabber plumage tend to dominate males with brighter plumage. We investigated this apparent paradox by conducting a breeding-season dominance experiment using captive males. We paired unfamiliar males of contrasting plumage brightness in a series of dominance trials during the breeding season and found that drabber males were dominant to brighter males in competition for access to food. Furthermore, in two captive flocks of males, plumage brightness was significantly negatively associated with social dominance. Although we have no conclusive evidence to explain why drab male House Finches are dominant to bright males throughout the year, we believe that motivational asymmetry may contribute to the observed negative correlation between signal intensity and signaler quality ('negatively correlated handicap'). Drab males may be more willing to compete for access to food or to females than are bright males because of the nutritional and/or mating disadvantages from which they suffer.

KW - Aggression

KW - Carpodacus mexicanus

KW - House Finch

KW - Plumage coloration

KW - Social dominance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034114631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034114631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034114631

VL - 102

SP - 456

EP - 461

JO - Condor

JF - Condor

SN - 0010-5422

IS - 2

ER -