Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda

Xuemei Bai, Sander Van Der Leeuw, Karen O'Brien, Frans Berkhout, Frank Biermann, Eduardo S. Brondizio, Christophe Cudennec, John Dearing, Anantha Duraiappah, Marion Glaser, Andrew Revkin, Will Steffen, James Syvitski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 20 2015

Fingerprint

coevolution
anthropogenic effect
Anthropocene
sustainability
present
natural sciences
science
social factors
Group
social science
driver
trend
natural science
social condition
policy
time

Keywords

  • Anthropocene
  • Changing role of science
  • Plausible and desirable futures
  • Societal goals
  • Societal trend and dynamics
  • Transition and transformation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Global and Planetary Change

Cite this

Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene : A new research agenda. / Bai, Xuemei; Van Der Leeuw, Sander; O'Brien, Karen; Berkhout, Frans; Biermann, Frank; Brondizio, Eduardo S.; Cudennec, Christophe; Dearing, John; Duraiappah, Anantha; Glaser, Marion; Revkin, Andrew; Steffen, Will; Syvitski, James.

In: Global Environmental Change, 20.03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bai, X, Van Der Leeuw, S, O'Brien, K, Berkhout, F, Biermann, F, Brondizio, ES, Cudennec, C, Dearing, J, Duraiappah, A, Glaser, M, Revkin, A, Steffen, W & Syvitski, J 2015, 'Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda', Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017
Bai, Xuemei ; Van Der Leeuw, Sander ; O'Brien, Karen ; Berkhout, Frans ; Biermann, Frank ; Brondizio, Eduardo S. ; Cudennec, Christophe ; Dearing, John ; Duraiappah, Anantha ; Glaser, Marion ; Revkin, Andrew ; Steffen, Will ; Syvitski, James. / Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene : A new research agenda. In: Global Environmental Change. 2015.
@article{4b08fd399ba84dd39c3a80288ad553d5,
title = "Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda",
abstract = "While the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures.",
keywords = "Anthropocene, Changing role of science, Plausible and desirable futures, Societal goals, Societal trend and dynamics, Transition and transformation",
author = "Xuemei Bai and {Van Der Leeuw}, Sander and Karen O'Brien and Frans Berkhout and Frank Biermann and Brondizio, {Eduardo S.} and Christophe Cudennec and John Dearing and Anantha Duraiappah and Marion Glaser and Andrew Revkin and Will Steffen and James Syvitski",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Global Environmental Change",
issn = "0959-3780",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene

T2 - A new research agenda

AU - Bai, Xuemei

AU - Van Der Leeuw, Sander

AU - O'Brien, Karen

AU - Berkhout, Frans

AU - Biermann, Frank

AU - Brondizio, Eduardo S.

AU - Cudennec, Christophe

AU - Dearing, John

AU - Duraiappah, Anantha

AU - Glaser, Marion

AU - Revkin, Andrew

AU - Steffen, Will

AU - Syvitski, James

PY - 2015/3/20

Y1 - 2015/3/20

N2 - While the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures.

AB - While the concept of the Anthropocene reflects the past and present nature, scale and magnitude of human impacts on the Earth System, its true significance lies in how it can be used to guide attitudes, choices, policies and actions that influence the future. Yet, to date much of the research on the Anthropocene has focused on interpreting past and present changes, while saying little about the future. Likewise, many futures studies have been insufficiently rooted in an understanding of past changes, in particular the long-term co-evolution of bio-physical and human systems. The Anthropocene perspective is one that encapsulates a world of intertwined drivers, complex dynamic structures, emergent phenomena and unintended consequences, manifest across different scales and within interlinked biophysical constraints and social conditions. In this paper we discuss the changing role of science and the theoretical, methodological and analytical challenges in considering futures of the Anthropocene. We present three broad groups of research questions on: (1) societal goals for the future; (2) major trends and dynamics that might favor or hinder them; (3) and factors that might propel or impede transformations towards desirable futures. Tackling these questions requires the development of novel approaches integrating natural and social sciences as well as the humanities beyond what is current today. We present three examples, one from each group of questions, illustrating how science might contribute to the identification of desirable and plausible futures and pave the way for transformations towards them. We argue that it is time for debates on the sustainability of the Anthropocene to focus on opportunities for realizing desirable and plausible futures.

KW - Anthropocene

KW - Changing role of science

KW - Plausible and desirable futures

KW - Societal goals

KW - Societal trend and dynamics

KW - Transition and transformation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951109395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951109395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017

DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.017

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84951109395

JO - Global Environmental Change

JF - Global Environmental Change

SN - 0959-3780

ER -