Abstract

Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-à-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered 'occurrable'. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-147
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
Volume9
Issue number2-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Scenarios
Methodology
Credibility

Keywords

  • Anticipatory knowledge
  • Foresight
  • Future studies
  • Plausibility
  • Probability
  • Scenario assessment
  • Scenarios
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Plausibility indications in future scenarios. / Wiek, Arnim; Keeler, Lauren; Schweizer, Vanessa; Lang, Daniel J.

In: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2-4, 2013, p. 133-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiek, Arnim ; Keeler, Lauren ; Schweizer, Vanessa ; Lang, Daniel J. / Plausibility indications in future scenarios. In: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy. 2013 ; Vol. 9, No. 2-4. pp. 133-147.
@article{488fdc9cbe8e458e858958f31a3779d6,
title = "Plausibility indications in future scenarios",
abstract = "Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-{\`a}-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered 'occurrable'. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.",
keywords = "Anticipatory knowledge, Foresight, Future studies, Plausibility, Probability, Scenario assessment, Scenarios, Sustainability",
author = "Arnim Wiek and Lauren Keeler and Vanessa Schweizer and Lang, {Daniel J.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "133--147",
journal = "International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy",
issn = "1740-2816",
publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
number = "2-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plausibility indications in future scenarios

AU - Wiek, Arnim

AU - Keeler, Lauren

AU - Schweizer, Vanessa

AU - Lang, Daniel J.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-à-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered 'occurrable'. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.

AB - Quality criteria for generating future-oriented knowledge and future scenarios are different from those developed for knowledge about past and current events. Such quality criteria can be defined relative to the intended function of the knowledge. Plausibility has emerged as a central quality criterion of scenarios that allows exploring the future with credibility and saliency. But what exactly is plausibility vis-à-vis probability, consistency, and desirability? And how can plausibility be evaluated and constructed in scenarios? Sufficient plausibility, in this article, refers to scenarios that hold enough evidence to be considered 'occurrable'. This might have been the underlying idea of scenarios all along without being explicitly elaborated in a pragmatic concept or methodology. Here, we operationalise plausibility in scenarios through a set of plausibility indications and illustrate the proposal with scenarios constructed for Phoenix, Arizona. The article operationalises the concept of plausibility in scenarios to support scholars and practitioners alike.

KW - Anticipatory knowledge

KW - Foresight

KW - Future studies

KW - Plausibility

KW - Probability

KW - Scenario assessment

KW - Scenarios

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893124587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893124587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611

DO - 10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058611

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893124587

VL - 9

SP - 133

EP - 147

JO - International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy

JF - International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy

SN - 1740-2816

IS - 2-4

ER -