Plausibility and probability in scenario planning

Rafael Ramírez, Cynthia Selin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore extant distinctions between plausibility and probability in scenario planning and re-frame the either/or stance in the literature within a broader set of methodological choice possibilities. Design/methodology/approach: The paper surveys the history of both terms in both the English language and more narrowly within scenario planning, critically assessing the confusions that have arisen. The paper questions the distinctions that have been made and offers a richer set of combinations to open up the methodological space available. Findings: The paper suggests that the either/or stances that have been dominant in the literature - and even shaped distinctions between different schools of scenario planning - must be surpassed by a richer set of combinations that open up new methodological approaches and possibilities. Research limitations/implications: This is a conceptual and exploratory paper. Therefore the findings are propositions and tentative. Practical implications: The paper opens up new ways of producing scenarios and may dissolve some of the infertile distinctions that have plagued the field to now. Originality/value: The paper dilutes distinctions that have been accepted for decades and opens up new possibilities in the scenarios field, which is growing and is now producing some 2,200 peer-reviewed articles/year in English alone as per the EBSCO database.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-74
Number of pages21
JournalForesight
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Planning
Scenario planning
Scenarios
Data base
Peers
Design methodology

Keywords

  • Choice of method
  • Methodology
  • Plausibility
  • Probability
  • Scenario planning
  • Schools of scenario planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Plausibility and probability in scenario planning. / Ramírez, Rafael; Selin, Cynthia.

In: Foresight, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2014, p. 54-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramírez, Rafael ; Selin, Cynthia. / Plausibility and probability in scenario planning. In: Foresight. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 54-74.
@article{75d2fb11a4054584b6a552b68405d74b,
title = "Plausibility and probability in scenario planning",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore extant distinctions between plausibility and probability in scenario planning and re-frame the either/or stance in the literature within a broader set of methodological choice possibilities. Design/methodology/approach: The paper surveys the history of both terms in both the English language and more narrowly within scenario planning, critically assessing the confusions that have arisen. The paper questions the distinctions that have been made and offers a richer set of combinations to open up the methodological space available. Findings: The paper suggests that the either/or stances that have been dominant in the literature - and even shaped distinctions between different schools of scenario planning - must be surpassed by a richer set of combinations that open up new methodological approaches and possibilities. Research limitations/implications: This is a conceptual and exploratory paper. Therefore the findings are propositions and tentative. Practical implications: The paper opens up new ways of producing scenarios and may dissolve some of the infertile distinctions that have plagued the field to now. Originality/value: The paper dilutes distinctions that have been accepted for decades and opens up new possibilities in the scenarios field, which is growing and is now producing some 2,200 peer-reviewed articles/year in English alone as per the EBSCO database.",
keywords = "Choice of method, Methodology, Plausibility, Probability, Scenario planning, Schools of scenario planning",
author = "Rafael Ram{\'i}rez and Cynthia Selin",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1108/FS-08-2012-0061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "54--74",
journal = "Foresight",
issn = "1463-6689",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plausibility and probability in scenario planning

AU - Ramírez, Rafael

AU - Selin, Cynthia

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore extant distinctions between plausibility and probability in scenario planning and re-frame the either/or stance in the literature within a broader set of methodological choice possibilities. Design/methodology/approach: The paper surveys the history of both terms in both the English language and more narrowly within scenario planning, critically assessing the confusions that have arisen. The paper questions the distinctions that have been made and offers a richer set of combinations to open up the methodological space available. Findings: The paper suggests that the either/or stances that have been dominant in the literature - and even shaped distinctions between different schools of scenario planning - must be surpassed by a richer set of combinations that open up new methodological approaches and possibilities. Research limitations/implications: This is a conceptual and exploratory paper. Therefore the findings are propositions and tentative. Practical implications: The paper opens up new ways of producing scenarios and may dissolve some of the infertile distinctions that have plagued the field to now. Originality/value: The paper dilutes distinctions that have been accepted for decades and opens up new possibilities in the scenarios field, which is growing and is now producing some 2,200 peer-reviewed articles/year in English alone as per the EBSCO database.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore extant distinctions between plausibility and probability in scenario planning and re-frame the either/or stance in the literature within a broader set of methodological choice possibilities. Design/methodology/approach: The paper surveys the history of both terms in both the English language and more narrowly within scenario planning, critically assessing the confusions that have arisen. The paper questions the distinctions that have been made and offers a richer set of combinations to open up the methodological space available. Findings: The paper suggests that the either/or stances that have been dominant in the literature - and even shaped distinctions between different schools of scenario planning - must be surpassed by a richer set of combinations that open up new methodological approaches and possibilities. Research limitations/implications: This is a conceptual and exploratory paper. Therefore the findings are propositions and tentative. Practical implications: The paper opens up new ways of producing scenarios and may dissolve some of the infertile distinctions that have plagued the field to now. Originality/value: The paper dilutes distinctions that have been accepted for decades and opens up new possibilities in the scenarios field, which is growing and is now producing some 2,200 peer-reviewed articles/year in English alone as per the EBSCO database.

KW - Choice of method

KW - Methodology

KW - Plausibility

KW - Probability

KW - Scenario planning

KW - Schools of scenario planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893109487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893109487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/FS-08-2012-0061

DO - 10.1108/FS-08-2012-0061

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 54

EP - 74

JO - Foresight

JF - Foresight

SN - 1463-6689

IS - 1

ER -