Plausibility and probability in juridical proof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

This note discusses three issues that Allen and Pardo believe to be especially problematic for a probabilistic interpretation of standards of proof: (1) the subjectivity of probability assignments; (2) the conjunction paradox; and (3) the non-comparative nature of probabilistic standards. I offer a reading of probabilistic standards that avoids these criticisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence and Proof
Volume23
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Keywords

  • Plausibility
  • Probability
  • Standard of Proof
  • evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Plausibility and probability in juridical proof'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this