Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment

Neil J A Woodroffe, Samuel Ariaratnam

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Buried municipal infrastructure is rapidly expanding due to increased urbanization. Subsequently, engineers and contractors are faced with having to designate the most effective method of installing new buried infrastructure while being mindful of cost considerations. In order to determine the most feasible underground construction method, various risks and cost factors must be assessed and analyzed. A comprehensive survey was conducted at Arizona State University to solicit input from twenty-eight contractors in various geographical regions throughout the United States and Canada. The intent was to determine specific risk factors and their inherent impacts, as well as to quantify cost comparison between Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) and traditional open cut construction methods. This paper identifies and describes risks and cost factors that were subsequently used to create a planning tool for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction
Pages41
Number of pages1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007
EventPipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Boston, MA, United States
Duration: Jul 8 2007Jul 11 2007

Other

OtherPipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects
CountryUnited States
CityBoston, MA
Period7/8/077/11/07

Fingerprint

Pipelines
Planning
Contractors
Costs
Geographical regions
Directional drilling
Horizontal drilling
Engineers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Metals and Alloys

Cite this

Woodroffe, N. J. A., & Ariaratnam, S. (2007). Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment. In Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction (pp. 41) https://doi.org/10.1061/40934(252)41

Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment. / Woodroffe, Neil J A; Ariaratnam, Samuel.

Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction. 2007. p. 41.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Woodroffe, NJA & Ariaratnam, S 2007, Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment. in Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction. pp. 41, Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, Boston, MA, United States, 7/8/07. https://doi.org/10.1061/40934(252)41
Woodroffe NJA, Ariaratnam S. Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment. In Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction. 2007. p. 41 https://doi.org/10.1061/40934(252)41
Woodroffe, Neil J A ; Ariaratnam, Samuel. / Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment. Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction. 2007. pp. 41
@inproceedings{4042755267ad41e1a6296f604b290c1e,
title = "Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment",
abstract = "Buried municipal infrastructure is rapidly expanding due to increased urbanization. Subsequently, engineers and contractors are faced with having to designate the most effective method of installing new buried infrastructure while being mindful of cost considerations. In order to determine the most feasible underground construction method, various risks and cost factors must be assessed and analyzed. A comprehensive survey was conducted at Arizona State University to solicit input from twenty-eight contractors in various geographical regions throughout the United States and Canada. The intent was to determine specific risk factors and their inherent impacts, as well as to quantify cost comparison between Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) and traditional open cut construction methods. This paper identifies and describes risks and cost factors that were subsequently used to create a planning tool for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment.",
author = "Woodroffe, {Neil J A} and Samuel Ariaratnam",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1061/40934(252)41",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "078440934X",
pages = "41",
booktitle = "Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Planning methodology for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment

AU - Woodroffe, Neil J A

AU - Ariaratnam, Samuel

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Buried municipal infrastructure is rapidly expanding due to increased urbanization. Subsequently, engineers and contractors are faced with having to designate the most effective method of installing new buried infrastructure while being mindful of cost considerations. In order to determine the most feasible underground construction method, various risks and cost factors must be assessed and analyzed. A comprehensive survey was conducted at Arizona State University to solicit input from twenty-eight contractors in various geographical regions throughout the United States and Canada. The intent was to determine specific risk factors and their inherent impacts, as well as to quantify cost comparison between Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) and traditional open cut construction methods. This paper identifies and describes risks and cost factors that were subsequently used to create a planning tool for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment.

AB - Buried municipal infrastructure is rapidly expanding due to increased urbanization. Subsequently, engineers and contractors are faced with having to designate the most effective method of installing new buried infrastructure while being mindful of cost considerations. In order to determine the most feasible underground construction method, various risks and cost factors must be assessed and analyzed. A comprehensive survey was conducted at Arizona State University to solicit input from twenty-eight contractors in various geographical regions throughout the United States and Canada. The intent was to determine specific risk factors and their inherent impacts, as well as to quantify cost comparison between Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) and traditional open cut construction methods. This paper identifies and describes risks and cost factors that were subsequently used to create a planning tool for small diameter pipelines in an urban environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348988028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348988028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/40934(252)41

DO - 10.1061/40934(252)41

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:36348988028

SN - 078440934X

SN - 9780784409343

SP - 41

BT - Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects - Proceedings of the ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction

ER -