Abstract

Changing patterns of university and government research and training in this country and abroad force its, as archaeologists, to regularly reevaluate our disciplinary methods and goals. In the absence of careful consideration of these issues, the relative prominence of archaeology may stagnate or even diminish. From our own experience directing large multidisciplinary research projects, we believe that one particularly productive avenue for future archaeological research will be as collaborators in seeking to better understand contemporary socioenvironmental problems. We argue that current environmental research based in life, earth, and social sciences pays inadequate attention to the long time span and slow-moving processes that often underlie environmental crises. Archaeologists, as purveyors of the past, are well equipped to bring this long-term perspective to bear on contemporary issues. Moreover, we are also trained to work in multiple scales of time and space as well as with scientists from various disciplines. The primary obstacles to achieving the type of transdisciplinary research recommended here emanate from distinct vocabulary, concepts, and practices of each disciplinary tradition. We believe that the time is right and our colleagues are willing to see an enhanced role for archaeologists in the study of contemporary environmental issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-605
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Antiquity
Volume67
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

archaeology
environmental research
transdisciplinary
vocabulary
research project
social science
university
time
Archaeologists
Archaeology
experience
Vocabulary
Multidisciplinary Research
Government
Research Projects
Environmental Crisis
Earth Science
Archaeological Research
Life Sciences
Collaborators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • History
  • Archaeology
  • Museology

Cite this

Placing archaeology at the center of socio-natural studies. / Van Der Leeuw, Sander; Redman, Charles.

In: American Antiquity, Vol. 67, No. 4, 2002, p. 597-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{901ad608059b467790d3afffb9860e54,
title = "Placing archaeology at the center of socio-natural studies",
abstract = "Changing patterns of university and government research and training in this country and abroad force its, as archaeologists, to regularly reevaluate our disciplinary methods and goals. In the absence of careful consideration of these issues, the relative prominence of archaeology may stagnate or even diminish. From our own experience directing large multidisciplinary research projects, we believe that one particularly productive avenue for future archaeological research will be as collaborators in seeking to better understand contemporary socioenvironmental problems. We argue that current environmental research based in life, earth, and social sciences pays inadequate attention to the long time span and slow-moving processes that often underlie environmental crises. Archaeologists, as purveyors of the past, are well equipped to bring this long-term perspective to bear on contemporary issues. Moreover, we are also trained to work in multiple scales of time and space as well as with scientists from various disciplines. The primary obstacles to achieving the type of transdisciplinary research recommended here emanate from distinct vocabulary, concepts, and practices of each disciplinary tradition. We believe that the time is right and our colleagues are willing to see an enhanced role for archaeologists in the study of contemporary environmental issues.",
author = "{Van Der Leeuw}, Sander and Charles Redman",
year = "2002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "597--605",
journal = "American Antiquity",
issn = "0002-7316",
publisher = "Society for American Archaeology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Placing archaeology at the center of socio-natural studies

AU - Van Der Leeuw, Sander

AU - Redman, Charles

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Changing patterns of university and government research and training in this country and abroad force its, as archaeologists, to regularly reevaluate our disciplinary methods and goals. In the absence of careful consideration of these issues, the relative prominence of archaeology may stagnate or even diminish. From our own experience directing large multidisciplinary research projects, we believe that one particularly productive avenue for future archaeological research will be as collaborators in seeking to better understand contemporary socioenvironmental problems. We argue that current environmental research based in life, earth, and social sciences pays inadequate attention to the long time span and slow-moving processes that often underlie environmental crises. Archaeologists, as purveyors of the past, are well equipped to bring this long-term perspective to bear on contemporary issues. Moreover, we are also trained to work in multiple scales of time and space as well as with scientists from various disciplines. The primary obstacles to achieving the type of transdisciplinary research recommended here emanate from distinct vocabulary, concepts, and practices of each disciplinary tradition. We believe that the time is right and our colleagues are willing to see an enhanced role for archaeologists in the study of contemporary environmental issues.

AB - Changing patterns of university and government research and training in this country and abroad force its, as archaeologists, to regularly reevaluate our disciplinary methods and goals. In the absence of careful consideration of these issues, the relative prominence of archaeology may stagnate or even diminish. From our own experience directing large multidisciplinary research projects, we believe that one particularly productive avenue for future archaeological research will be as collaborators in seeking to better understand contemporary socioenvironmental problems. We argue that current environmental research based in life, earth, and social sciences pays inadequate attention to the long time span and slow-moving processes that often underlie environmental crises. Archaeologists, as purveyors of the past, are well equipped to bring this long-term perspective to bear on contemporary issues. Moreover, we are also trained to work in multiple scales of time and space as well as with scientists from various disciplines. The primary obstacles to achieving the type of transdisciplinary research recommended here emanate from distinct vocabulary, concepts, and practices of each disciplinary tradition. We believe that the time is right and our colleagues are willing to see an enhanced role for archaeologists in the study of contemporary environmental issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013092162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013092162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0013092162

VL - 67

SP - 597

EP - 605

JO - American Antiquity

JF - American Antiquity

SN - 0002-7316

IS - 4

ER -