Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals

William A. Yost, Dan Mapes-Riordan, William Shofner, Raymond Dye, Stanley Sheft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Click trains were generated with first- and second-order statistics following Kaernbach and Demany [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2298-2306 (1998)]. First-order intervals are between successive clicks, while second-order intervals are those between every other click. Click trains were generated with a repeating alternation of fixed and random intervals which produce a pitch at the reciprocal of the duration of the fixed interval. The intervals were then randomly shuffled and compared to the unshuffled, alternating click trains in pitch-strength comparison experiments. In almost all comparisons for the first-order interval stimuli, the shuffled-interval click trains had a stronger pitch strength than the unshuffled-interval click trains. The shuffled-interval click trains only produced stronger pitches for second-order interval stimuli when the click trains were unfiltered. Several experimental conditions and an analysis of runs of regular and random intervals in these click trains suggest that the auditory system is sensitive to runs of regular intervals in a stimulus that contains a mix of regular and random intervals. These results indicate that fine-structure regularity plays a more important role in pitch perception than randomness, and that the long-term autocorrelation function or spectra of these click trains are not good predictors of pitch strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3054-3068
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume117
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this