Pigeons (Columba livia) approach nash equilibrium in experimental matching pennies competitions

Federico Sanabria, Eric Thrailkill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The game of Matching Pennies (MP), a simplified version of the more popular Rock, Papers, Scissors, schematically represents competitions between organisms with incentives to predict each other's behavior. Optimal performance in iterated MP competitions involves the production of random choice patterns and the detection of nonrandomness in the opponent's choices. The purpose of this study was to replicate systematic deviations from optimal choice observed in humans when playing MP, and to establish whether suboptimal performance was better described by a modified linear learning model or by a more cognitively sophisticated reinforcement-tracking model. Two pairs of pigeons played iterated MP competitions; payoffs for successful choices (e.g., "Rock" vs. "Scissors") varied within experimental sessions and across experimental conditions, and were signaled by visual stimuli. Pigeons' behavior adjusted to payoff matrices; divergences from optimal play were analogous to those usually demonstrated by humans, except for the tendency of pigeons to persist on prior choices. Suboptimal play was well characterized by a linear learning model of the kind widely used to describe human performance. This linear learning model may thus serve as default account of competitive performance against which the imputation of cognitively sophisticated processes can be evaluated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-183
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Columbidae
Linear Models
Learning
Motivation

Keywords

  • Behavioral economics
  • Choice
  • Competition
  • Key peck
  • Mixed-strategy equilibrium
  • Model
  • Pigeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Pigeons (Columba livia) approach nash equilibrium in experimental matching pennies competitions. / Sanabria, Federico; Thrailkill, Eric.

In: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Vol. 91, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 169-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c4446644b8f94b468ecb196a88d1f10c,
title = "Pigeons (Columba livia) approach nash equilibrium in experimental matching pennies competitions",
abstract = "The game of Matching Pennies (MP), a simplified version of the more popular Rock, Papers, Scissors, schematically represents competitions between organisms with incentives to predict each other's behavior. Optimal performance in iterated MP competitions involves the production of random choice patterns and the detection of nonrandomness in the opponent's choices. The purpose of this study was to replicate systematic deviations from optimal choice observed in humans when playing MP, and to establish whether suboptimal performance was better described by a modified linear learning model or by a more cognitively sophisticated reinforcement-tracking model. Two pairs of pigeons played iterated MP competitions; payoffs for successful choices (e.g., {"}Rock{"} vs. {"}Scissors{"}) varied within experimental sessions and across experimental conditions, and were signaled by visual stimuli. Pigeons' behavior adjusted to payoff matrices; divergences from optimal play were analogous to those usually demonstrated by humans, except for the tendency of pigeons to persist on prior choices. Suboptimal play was well characterized by a linear learning model of the kind widely used to describe human performance. This linear learning model may thus serve as default account of competitive performance against which the imputation of cognitively sophisticated processes can be evaluated.",
keywords = "Behavioral economics, Choice, Competition, Key peck, Mixed-strategy equilibrium, Model, Pigeons",
author = "Federico Sanabria and Eric Thrailkill",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1901/jeab.2009.91-169",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "169--183",
journal = "Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior",
issn = "0022-5002",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pigeons (Columba livia) approach nash equilibrium in experimental matching pennies competitions

AU - Sanabria, Federico

AU - Thrailkill, Eric

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - The game of Matching Pennies (MP), a simplified version of the more popular Rock, Papers, Scissors, schematically represents competitions between organisms with incentives to predict each other's behavior. Optimal performance in iterated MP competitions involves the production of random choice patterns and the detection of nonrandomness in the opponent's choices. The purpose of this study was to replicate systematic deviations from optimal choice observed in humans when playing MP, and to establish whether suboptimal performance was better described by a modified linear learning model or by a more cognitively sophisticated reinforcement-tracking model. Two pairs of pigeons played iterated MP competitions; payoffs for successful choices (e.g., "Rock" vs. "Scissors") varied within experimental sessions and across experimental conditions, and were signaled by visual stimuli. Pigeons' behavior adjusted to payoff matrices; divergences from optimal play were analogous to those usually demonstrated by humans, except for the tendency of pigeons to persist on prior choices. Suboptimal play was well characterized by a linear learning model of the kind widely used to describe human performance. This linear learning model may thus serve as default account of competitive performance against which the imputation of cognitively sophisticated processes can be evaluated.

AB - The game of Matching Pennies (MP), a simplified version of the more popular Rock, Papers, Scissors, schematically represents competitions between organisms with incentives to predict each other's behavior. Optimal performance in iterated MP competitions involves the production of random choice patterns and the detection of nonrandomness in the opponent's choices. The purpose of this study was to replicate systematic deviations from optimal choice observed in humans when playing MP, and to establish whether suboptimal performance was better described by a modified linear learning model or by a more cognitively sophisticated reinforcement-tracking model. Two pairs of pigeons played iterated MP competitions; payoffs for successful choices (e.g., "Rock" vs. "Scissors") varied within experimental sessions and across experimental conditions, and were signaled by visual stimuli. Pigeons' behavior adjusted to payoff matrices; divergences from optimal play were analogous to those usually demonstrated by humans, except for the tendency of pigeons to persist on prior choices. Suboptimal play was well characterized by a linear learning model of the kind widely used to describe human performance. This linear learning model may thus serve as default account of competitive performance against which the imputation of cognitively sophisticated processes can be evaluated.

KW - Behavioral economics

KW - Choice

KW - Competition

KW - Key peck

KW - Mixed-strategy equilibrium

KW - Model

KW - Pigeons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69349096088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69349096088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-169

DO - 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-169

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 169

EP - 183

JO - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

JF - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

SN - 0022-5002

IS - 2

ER -