Phrase completion scales: A better measurement approach than Likert scales?

David Hodge, David F. Gillespie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Valid and reliable measures are fundamental to advancing social science. Phrase completion scales were designed to provide enhanced psychometrics compared to Likert scales by more closely conforming to foundational measurement and statistical assumptions. This article tests the two approaches by examining responses (N = 134) to items formatted using the Likert approach with comparable items formatted using the phrase completion approach. An assessment of the written comments, Cronbach's alphas, inter-item correlations, factor scores, and SEM coefficients suggested that items constructed in the phrase completion format may yield higher validity and reliability relative to Likert constructed items. The advantages of phrase completion scales may be particularly pronounced when measuring attitudes that fall at all points along the underlying attitudinal continuum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Social Service Research
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 22 2007

Fingerprint

psychometrics
social science

Keywords

  • Index construction
  • Likert scales
  • Measurement
  • Phrase completion scales
  • Survey research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Phrase completion scales : A better measurement approach than Likert scales? / Hodge, David; Gillespie, David F.

In: Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, 22.06.2007, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cbd30d9619964342856fc409555ad0eb,
title = "Phrase completion scales: A better measurement approach than Likert scales?",
abstract = "Valid and reliable measures are fundamental to advancing social science. Phrase completion scales were designed to provide enhanced psychometrics compared to Likert scales by more closely conforming to foundational measurement and statistical assumptions. This article tests the two approaches by examining responses (N = 134) to items formatted using the Likert approach with comparable items formatted using the phrase completion approach. An assessment of the written comments, Cronbach's alphas, inter-item correlations, factor scores, and SEM coefficients suggested that items constructed in the phrase completion format may yield higher validity and reliability relative to Likert constructed items. The advantages of phrase completion scales may be particularly pronounced when measuring attitudes that fall at all points along the underlying attitudinal continuum.",
keywords = "Index construction, Likert scales, Measurement, Phrase completion scales, Survey research",
author = "David Hodge and Gillespie, {David F.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1300/J079v33n04_01",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Journal of Social Service Research",
issn = "0148-8376",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phrase completion scales

T2 - A better measurement approach than Likert scales?

AU - Hodge, David

AU - Gillespie, David F.

PY - 2007/6/22

Y1 - 2007/6/22

N2 - Valid and reliable measures are fundamental to advancing social science. Phrase completion scales were designed to provide enhanced psychometrics compared to Likert scales by more closely conforming to foundational measurement and statistical assumptions. This article tests the two approaches by examining responses (N = 134) to items formatted using the Likert approach with comparable items formatted using the phrase completion approach. An assessment of the written comments, Cronbach's alphas, inter-item correlations, factor scores, and SEM coefficients suggested that items constructed in the phrase completion format may yield higher validity and reliability relative to Likert constructed items. The advantages of phrase completion scales may be particularly pronounced when measuring attitudes that fall at all points along the underlying attitudinal continuum.

AB - Valid and reliable measures are fundamental to advancing social science. Phrase completion scales were designed to provide enhanced psychometrics compared to Likert scales by more closely conforming to foundational measurement and statistical assumptions. This article tests the two approaches by examining responses (N = 134) to items formatted using the Likert approach with comparable items formatted using the phrase completion approach. An assessment of the written comments, Cronbach's alphas, inter-item correlations, factor scores, and SEM coefficients suggested that items constructed in the phrase completion format may yield higher validity and reliability relative to Likert constructed items. The advantages of phrase completion scales may be particularly pronounced when measuring attitudes that fall at all points along the underlying attitudinal continuum.

KW - Index construction

KW - Likert scales

KW - Measurement

KW - Phrase completion scales

KW - Survey research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548500349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548500349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J079v33n04_01

DO - 10.1300/J079v33n04_01

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548500349

VL - 33

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Journal of Social Service Research

JF - Journal of Social Service Research

SN - 0148-8376

IS - 4

ER -