Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations

Evan H. De Lucia, Hemanth D. Shenoi, Shawna L. Naidu, Thomas Day

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The photosynthetic responses to light of leaves irradiated on the adaxial or abaxial surfaces, were measured for plants with contrasting leaf orientations. For vertical-leaf species of open habitats (Eryngium yuccifolium and Silphium terebinthinaceum), photosynthetic rates were identical when irradiated on either surface. However, for horizontal-leaf species of open habitats (Ambrosia trifida and Solidago canadensis), light-saturated rates of photosynthesis for adaxial irradiation were 19 to 37% higher than rates for abaxial irradiation. Leaves of understory plants (Asarum canadense and Hydrophyllum canadense) were functionally symmetrical although they had horizontal orientation. Photosynthetic rates were measured at saturating CO2, thus differences in the response to incident irradiance presumably resulted from complex interactions of light and leaf optical properties rather than from stomatal effects. Differences in absorptance (400-700 nm) among leaf surfaces were evident for horizontal-leaf species but the primary determinant of functional symmetry was leaf anatomy. Functionally symmetrical leaves had upper and lower palisade layers of equal thickness (vertical leaves of open habitats) or were composed primarily of a single layer of photosynthetic cells (horizontal leaves of understory habitats). Photosynthetic symmetry of vertical-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and water-use efficiency, whereas asymmetry of horizontal-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and photosynthetic nutrient-use efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-57
Number of pages7
JournalOecologia
Volume87
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

symmetry
shade
leaves
habitat
habitats
Eryngium yuccifolium
Hydrophyllum
understory
Silphium
irradiation
Asarum
Ambrosia trifida
Solidago canadensis
nutrient use efficiency
carbon
optical properties
water use efficiency
anatomy
optical property
irradiance

Keywords

  • Functional symmetry
  • Leaf anatomy
  • Leaf orientation
  • Optical properties
  • Photosynthesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations. / De Lucia, Evan H.; Shenoi, Hemanth D.; Naidu, Shawna L.; Day, Thomas.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 87, No. 1, 06.1991, p. 51-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Lucia, Evan H. ; Shenoi, Hemanth D. ; Naidu, Shawna L. ; Day, Thomas. / Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations. In: Oecologia. 1991 ; Vol. 87, No. 1. pp. 51-57.
@article{276efe8618504fcfaeb61be59b3aabc9,
title = "Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations",
abstract = "The photosynthetic responses to light of leaves irradiated on the adaxial or abaxial surfaces, were measured for plants with contrasting leaf orientations. For vertical-leaf species of open habitats (Eryngium yuccifolium and Silphium terebinthinaceum), photosynthetic rates were identical when irradiated on either surface. However, for horizontal-leaf species of open habitats (Ambrosia trifida and Solidago canadensis), light-saturated rates of photosynthesis for adaxial irradiation were 19 to 37{\%} higher than rates for abaxial irradiation. Leaves of understory plants (Asarum canadense and Hydrophyllum canadense) were functionally symmetrical although they had horizontal orientation. Photosynthetic rates were measured at saturating CO2, thus differences in the response to incident irradiance presumably resulted from complex interactions of light and leaf optical properties rather than from stomatal effects. Differences in absorptance (400-700 nm) among leaf surfaces were evident for horizontal-leaf species but the primary determinant of functional symmetry was leaf anatomy. Functionally symmetrical leaves had upper and lower palisade layers of equal thickness (vertical leaves of open habitats) or were composed primarily of a single layer of photosynthetic cells (horizontal leaves of understory habitats). Photosynthetic symmetry of vertical-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and water-use efficiency, whereas asymmetry of horizontal-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and photosynthetic nutrient-use efficiency.",
keywords = "Functional symmetry, Leaf anatomy, Leaf orientation, Optical properties, Photosynthesis",
author = "{De Lucia}, {Evan H.} and Shenoi, {Hemanth D.} and Naidu, {Shawna L.} and Thomas Day",
year = "1991",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF00323779",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "51--57",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8519",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations

AU - De Lucia, Evan H.

AU - Shenoi, Hemanth D.

AU - Naidu, Shawna L.

AU - Day, Thomas

PY - 1991/6

Y1 - 1991/6

N2 - The photosynthetic responses to light of leaves irradiated on the adaxial or abaxial surfaces, were measured for plants with contrasting leaf orientations. For vertical-leaf species of open habitats (Eryngium yuccifolium and Silphium terebinthinaceum), photosynthetic rates were identical when irradiated on either surface. However, for horizontal-leaf species of open habitats (Ambrosia trifida and Solidago canadensis), light-saturated rates of photosynthesis for adaxial irradiation were 19 to 37% higher than rates for abaxial irradiation. Leaves of understory plants (Asarum canadense and Hydrophyllum canadense) were functionally symmetrical although they had horizontal orientation. Photosynthetic rates were measured at saturating CO2, thus differences in the response to incident irradiance presumably resulted from complex interactions of light and leaf optical properties rather than from stomatal effects. Differences in absorptance (400-700 nm) among leaf surfaces were evident for horizontal-leaf species but the primary determinant of functional symmetry was leaf anatomy. Functionally symmetrical leaves had upper and lower palisade layers of equal thickness (vertical leaves of open habitats) or were composed primarily of a single layer of photosynthetic cells (horizontal leaves of understory habitats). Photosynthetic symmetry of vertical-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and water-use efficiency, whereas asymmetry of horizontal-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and photosynthetic nutrient-use efficiency.

AB - The photosynthetic responses to light of leaves irradiated on the adaxial or abaxial surfaces, were measured for plants with contrasting leaf orientations. For vertical-leaf species of open habitats (Eryngium yuccifolium and Silphium terebinthinaceum), photosynthetic rates were identical when irradiated on either surface. However, for horizontal-leaf species of open habitats (Ambrosia trifida and Solidago canadensis), light-saturated rates of photosynthesis for adaxial irradiation were 19 to 37% higher than rates for abaxial irradiation. Leaves of understory plants (Asarum canadense and Hydrophyllum canadense) were functionally symmetrical although they had horizontal orientation. Photosynthetic rates were measured at saturating CO2, thus differences in the response to incident irradiance presumably resulted from complex interactions of light and leaf optical properties rather than from stomatal effects. Differences in absorptance (400-700 nm) among leaf surfaces were evident for horizontal-leaf species but the primary determinant of functional symmetry was leaf anatomy. Functionally symmetrical leaves had upper and lower palisade layers of equal thickness (vertical leaves of open habitats) or were composed primarily of a single layer of photosynthetic cells (horizontal leaves of understory habitats). Photosynthetic symmetry of vertical-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and water-use efficiency, whereas asymmetry of horizontal-leaf species may be an adaptation to maximize daily integrated carbon gain and photosynthetic nutrient-use efficiency.

KW - Functional symmetry

KW - Leaf anatomy

KW - Leaf orientation

KW - Optical properties

KW - Photosynthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026314302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026314302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00323779

DO - 10.1007/BF00323779

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 51

EP - 57

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8519

IS - 1

ER -