Philosophic Thinking in Social Work: An Analysis of 30 Years of Social Work Editorials

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article looks at 30 years of editorial perspectives and trends in social work as a profession through the analysis of editorials from the journal Social Work. It identifies the wax and wane of philosophic (intellectual or scholarly) questions in social work thinking in the past three decades. It defines what philosophic thinking means and identifies the types of knowledge generated by the editorial discussions and the directions set by them. It reviews the emergence of scientific thinking in social work and links it to the persistent influence of Flexner’s thinking and critique of 1915 in the minds of scholars. The perspectives and themes in the editorials accurately correspond with the paradigms observed in the profession and the different directions taken by social work education. The text analysis of 30 years of editorials shows the characteristic discussions and controversies that have challenged social work through the past three decades.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Social Work Education
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 20 2016

Fingerprint

social work
profession
text analysis
paradigm
trend
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Philosophic Thinking in Social Work : An Analysis of 30 Years of Social Work Editorials. / Martinez-Brawley, Emilia; Zorita, Paz.

In: Journal of Social Work Education, 20.05.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71b1d092422b471db49077880ba6f218,
title = "Philosophic Thinking in Social Work: An Analysis of 30 Years of Social Work Editorials",
abstract = "This article looks at 30 years of editorial perspectives and trends in social work as a profession through the analysis of editorials from the journal Social Work. It identifies the wax and wane of philosophic (intellectual or scholarly) questions in social work thinking in the past three decades. It defines what philosophic thinking means and identifies the types of knowledge generated by the editorial discussions and the directions set by them. It reviews the emergence of scientific thinking in social work and links it to the persistent influence of Flexner’s thinking and critique of 1915 in the minds of scholars. The perspectives and themes in the editorials accurately correspond with the paradigms observed in the profession and the different directions taken by social work education. The text analysis of 30 years of editorials shows the characteristic discussions and controversies that have challenged social work through the past three decades.",
author = "Emilia Martinez-Brawley and Paz Zorita",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/10437797.2016.1174650",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Social Work Education",
issn = "1043-7797",
publisher = "Council on Social Work Education",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Philosophic Thinking in Social Work

T2 - An Analysis of 30 Years of Social Work Editorials

AU - Martinez-Brawley, Emilia

AU - Zorita, Paz

PY - 2016/5/20

Y1 - 2016/5/20

N2 - This article looks at 30 years of editorial perspectives and trends in social work as a profession through the analysis of editorials from the journal Social Work. It identifies the wax and wane of philosophic (intellectual or scholarly) questions in social work thinking in the past three decades. It defines what philosophic thinking means and identifies the types of knowledge generated by the editorial discussions and the directions set by them. It reviews the emergence of scientific thinking in social work and links it to the persistent influence of Flexner’s thinking and critique of 1915 in the minds of scholars. The perspectives and themes in the editorials accurately correspond with the paradigms observed in the profession and the different directions taken by social work education. The text analysis of 30 years of editorials shows the characteristic discussions and controversies that have challenged social work through the past three decades.

AB - This article looks at 30 years of editorial perspectives and trends in social work as a profession through the analysis of editorials from the journal Social Work. It identifies the wax and wane of philosophic (intellectual or scholarly) questions in social work thinking in the past three decades. It defines what philosophic thinking means and identifies the types of knowledge generated by the editorial discussions and the directions set by them. It reviews the emergence of scientific thinking in social work and links it to the persistent influence of Flexner’s thinking and critique of 1915 in the minds of scholars. The perspectives and themes in the editorials accurately correspond with the paradigms observed in the profession and the different directions taken by social work education. The text analysis of 30 years of editorials shows the characteristic discussions and controversies that have challenged social work through the past three decades.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969257682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969257682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10437797.2016.1174650

DO - 10.1080/10437797.2016.1174650

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Social Work Education

JF - Journal of Social Work Education

SN - 1043-7797

ER -