Personalizing prognosis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the quality and nature of clinical prognostic tools for survival outcomes

Alyson L. Mahar, Carolyn Compton, Susan Halabi, Kenneth R. Hess, Martin R. Weiser, Patti A. Groome

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

98 Scopus citations

Abstract

Integrating diverse types of prognostic information into accurate, individualized estimates of outcome in colorectal cancer is challenging. Significant heterogeneity in colorectal cancer prognostication tool quality exists. Methodology is incompletely or inadequately reported. Evaluations of the internal or external validity of the prognostic model are rarely performed. Prognostication tools are important devices for patient management, but tool reliability is compromised by poor quality. Guidance for future development of prognostication tools in colorectal cancer is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)969-982
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume116
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2017

Keywords

  • clinical prediction tool
  • colorectal neoplasms
  • nomogram
  • prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personalizing prognosis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the quality and nature of clinical prognostic tools for survival outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this