Personal measures of power-frequency magnetic field exposure among men from an infertility clinic: Distribution, temporal variability and correlation with their female partners' exposure

Ryan C. Lewis, Russ Hauser, Andrew Maynard, Richard L. Neitzel, Lu Wang, Robert Kavet, Patricia Morey, Jennifer B. Ford, John D. Meeker, Earth Study Team

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Power-frequency magnetic field exposure science as it relates to men and couples have not been explored despite the advantage of this information in the design and interpretation of reproductive health epidemiology studies. This analysis examined the distribution and temporal variability of exposures in men, and the correlation of exposures within couples using data from a longitudinal study of 25 men and their female partners recruited from an infertility clinic. The average and 90th percentile demonstrated fair to good reproducibility, whereas the maximum showed poor reproducibility over repeated sampling days, each separated by a median of 4.6 weeks. Average magnetic field exposures were also strongly correlated within couples, suggesting that one partner's data could be used as a surrogate in the absence of data from the other for this metric. Environment was also an important effect modifier in these explored matters. These issues should be considered in future relevant epidemiology studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-408
Number of pages8
JournalRadiation Protection Dosimetry
Volume172
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

temporal distribution
Magnetic Fields
Infertility
epidemiology
Epidemiology
magnetic fields
Reproductive Health
Longitudinal Studies
health
sampling
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Personal measures of power-frequency magnetic field exposure among men from an infertility clinic : Distribution, temporal variability and correlation with their female partners' exposure. / Lewis, Ryan C.; Hauser, Russ; Maynard, Andrew; Neitzel, Richard L.; Wang, Lu; Kavet, Robert; Morey, Patricia; Ford, Jennifer B.; Meeker, John D.; Team, Earth Study.

In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 172, No. 4, 2016, p. 401-408.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lewis, Ryan C. ; Hauser, Russ ; Maynard, Andrew ; Neitzel, Richard L. ; Wang, Lu ; Kavet, Robert ; Morey, Patricia ; Ford, Jennifer B. ; Meeker, John D. ; Team, Earth Study. / Personal measures of power-frequency magnetic field exposure among men from an infertility clinic : Distribution, temporal variability and correlation with their female partners' exposure. In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2016 ; Vol. 172, No. 4. pp. 401-408.
@article{acafc19d555442479df4d7b71444a573,
title = "Personal measures of power-frequency magnetic field exposure among men from an infertility clinic: Distribution, temporal variability and correlation with their female partners' exposure",
abstract = "Power-frequency magnetic field exposure science as it relates to men and couples have not been explored despite the advantage of this information in the design and interpretation of reproductive health epidemiology studies. This analysis examined the distribution and temporal variability of exposures in men, and the correlation of exposures within couples using data from a longitudinal study of 25 men and their female partners recruited from an infertility clinic. The average and 90th percentile demonstrated fair to good reproducibility, whereas the maximum showed poor reproducibility over repeated sampling days, each separated by a median of 4.6 weeks. Average magnetic field exposures were also strongly correlated within couples, suggesting that one partner's data could be used as a surrogate in the absence of data from the other for this metric. Environment was also an important effect modifier in these explored matters. These issues should be considered in future relevant epidemiology studies.",
author = "Lewis, {Ryan C.} and Russ Hauser and Andrew Maynard and Neitzel, {Richard L.} and Lu Wang and Robert Kavet and Patricia Morey and Ford, {Jennifer B.} and Meeker, {John D.} and Team, {Earth Study}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncv515",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "401--408",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Personal measures of power-frequency magnetic field exposure among men from an infertility clinic

T2 - Distribution, temporal variability and correlation with their female partners' exposure

AU - Lewis, Ryan C.

AU - Hauser, Russ

AU - Maynard, Andrew

AU - Neitzel, Richard L.

AU - Wang, Lu

AU - Kavet, Robert

AU - Morey, Patricia

AU - Ford, Jennifer B.

AU - Meeker, John D.

AU - Team, Earth Study

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Power-frequency magnetic field exposure science as it relates to men and couples have not been explored despite the advantage of this information in the design and interpretation of reproductive health epidemiology studies. This analysis examined the distribution and temporal variability of exposures in men, and the correlation of exposures within couples using data from a longitudinal study of 25 men and their female partners recruited from an infertility clinic. The average and 90th percentile demonstrated fair to good reproducibility, whereas the maximum showed poor reproducibility over repeated sampling days, each separated by a median of 4.6 weeks. Average magnetic field exposures were also strongly correlated within couples, suggesting that one partner's data could be used as a surrogate in the absence of data from the other for this metric. Environment was also an important effect modifier in these explored matters. These issues should be considered in future relevant epidemiology studies.

AB - Power-frequency magnetic field exposure science as it relates to men and couples have not been explored despite the advantage of this information in the design and interpretation of reproductive health epidemiology studies. This analysis examined the distribution and temporal variability of exposures in men, and the correlation of exposures within couples using data from a longitudinal study of 25 men and their female partners recruited from an infertility clinic. The average and 90th percentile demonstrated fair to good reproducibility, whereas the maximum showed poor reproducibility over repeated sampling days, each separated by a median of 4.6 weeks. Average magnetic field exposures were also strongly correlated within couples, suggesting that one partner's data could be used as a surrogate in the absence of data from the other for this metric. Environment was also an important effect modifier in these explored matters. These issues should be considered in future relevant epidemiology studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014082135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014082135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncv515

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncv515

M3 - Article

C2 - 26705359

AN - SCOPUS:85014082135

VL - 172

SP - 401

EP - 408

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

SN - 0144-8420

IS - 4

ER -