TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance structures
T2 - A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal
AU - Gee, James Paul
AU - Grosjean, François
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are co-equal and their names are simply listed in alphabetical order. This study was conducted while James Paul Gee was a visiting research associate in the Department of Psychology, Northeastern University. The study was supported in part by grants from the Department of Health and Human Services (RR 07143 and NS 14923). We are most grateful to Judy Shepard-Kegl, not only for her comments and suggestions, but for introducing the authors to one another and hence for being at the “source” of this paper. We also thank Bill Cooper, Harlan Lane, Leah Larkey, and Joanne Miller for their useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and Peter Eimas and two anonymous reviewers for Cognitive Psychology for helpful suggestions on a later draft. Requests for reprints should be sent to James Paul Gee, Applied Psycholinguistics, School of Education, Boston University, 605 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215.
PY - 1983/10
Y1 - 1983/10
N2 - Two lines of research-one in psycholinguistics and one in linguistics-are combined to deal with a long-standing problem in both fields: why the "performance structures" of sentences (structures based on experimental data, such as pausing and parsing values) are not fully accountable for by linguistic theories of phrase structure. Two psycholinguistic algorithms that have been used to predict these structures are described and their limitations are examined. A third algorithm, based on the prosodic structures of sentences is then proposed and shown to be a far better predictor of performance structures. It is argued that the experimental data reflect aspects of the linguistic cognitive capacity, and that, in turn, linguistic theory can offer an illuminating account of the data. The prosodic model is shown to have a wider domain of application than temporal organization per se, accounting for parsing judgments as well as pausing performance, and reflecting aspects of syntactic and semantic structure as well as purely prosodic structure. Finally, the algorithm is discussed in light of language processing.
AB - Two lines of research-one in psycholinguistics and one in linguistics-are combined to deal with a long-standing problem in both fields: why the "performance structures" of sentences (structures based on experimental data, such as pausing and parsing values) are not fully accountable for by linguistic theories of phrase structure. Two psycholinguistic algorithms that have been used to predict these structures are described and their limitations are examined. A third algorithm, based on the prosodic structures of sentences is then proposed and shown to be a far better predictor of performance structures. It is argued that the experimental data reflect aspects of the linguistic cognitive capacity, and that, in turn, linguistic theory can offer an illuminating account of the data. The prosodic model is shown to have a wider domain of application than temporal organization per se, accounting for parsing judgments as well as pausing performance, and reflecting aspects of syntactic and semantic structure as well as purely prosodic structure. Finally, the algorithm is discussed in light of language processing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001200928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001200928&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90014-2
DO - 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90014-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0001200928
SN - 0010-0285
VL - 15
SP - 411
EP - 458
JO - Cognitive Psychology
JF - Cognitive Psychology
IS - 4
ER -