Performance in Relation to Job Skill Importance: A Consideration of Rater Source

Francis J. Yammarino, David Waldman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated relationships between the performance levels of incumbents on job skills and the importance attributed to those job skills. Supervisors and job incumbents rated both the performance of skill dimensions and the importance of those skills for respective incumbents' positions. Results indicated that the ratings of performance and importance on matched skill areas correlated positively, although relationships were somewhat stronger for incumbent data as compared with data provided by supervisors. Supervisors and incumbents agreed moderately on which skill areas were important for various positions, but the interrater agreement was much lower for performance ratings of the skill areas. For some skill areas, incumbent-rated importance and supervisor-rated performance, as well as incumbent-rated performance and supervisor-rated importance, were significantly correlated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)242-249
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume78
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1993
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Performance in Relation to Job Skill Importance : A Consideration of Rater Source. / Yammarino, Francis J.; Waldman, David.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, No. 2, 04.1993, p. 242-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e87327e2fcc450c9f4768e2de1fb32b,
title = "Performance in Relation to Job Skill Importance: A Consideration of Rater Source",
abstract = "This study investigated relationships between the performance levels of incumbents on job skills and the importance attributed to those job skills. Supervisors and job incumbents rated both the performance of skill dimensions and the importance of those skills for respective incumbents' positions. Results indicated that the ratings of performance and importance on matched skill areas correlated positively, although relationships were somewhat stronger for incumbent data as compared with data provided by supervisors. Supervisors and incumbents agreed moderately on which skill areas were important for various positions, but the interrater agreement was much lower for performance ratings of the skill areas. For some skill areas, incumbent-rated importance and supervisor-rated performance, as well as incumbent-rated performance and supervisor-rated importance, were significantly correlated.",
author = "Yammarino, {Francis J.} and David Waldman",
year = "1993",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "242--249",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance in Relation to Job Skill Importance

T2 - A Consideration of Rater Source

AU - Yammarino, Francis J.

AU - Waldman, David

PY - 1993/4

Y1 - 1993/4

N2 - This study investigated relationships between the performance levels of incumbents on job skills and the importance attributed to those job skills. Supervisors and job incumbents rated both the performance of skill dimensions and the importance of those skills for respective incumbents' positions. Results indicated that the ratings of performance and importance on matched skill areas correlated positively, although relationships were somewhat stronger for incumbent data as compared with data provided by supervisors. Supervisors and incumbents agreed moderately on which skill areas were important for various positions, but the interrater agreement was much lower for performance ratings of the skill areas. For some skill areas, incumbent-rated importance and supervisor-rated performance, as well as incumbent-rated performance and supervisor-rated importance, were significantly correlated.

AB - This study investigated relationships between the performance levels of incumbents on job skills and the importance attributed to those job skills. Supervisors and job incumbents rated both the performance of skill dimensions and the importance of those skills for respective incumbents' positions. Results indicated that the ratings of performance and importance on matched skill areas correlated positively, although relationships were somewhat stronger for incumbent data as compared with data provided by supervisors. Supervisors and incumbents agreed moderately on which skill areas were important for various positions, but the interrater agreement was much lower for performance ratings of the skill areas. For some skill areas, incumbent-rated importance and supervisor-rated performance, as well as incumbent-rated performance and supervisor-rated importance, were significantly correlated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21144474572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21144474572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21144474572

VL - 78

SP - 242

EP - 249

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 2

ER -