Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies

R. J. Culbertson; F. C. Burns; W. Franzen; L. J. Lowder; J. J. Ricca; A. Gonzales

doi:10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4

Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies

R. J. Culbertson, F. C. Burns, W. Franzen, L. J. Lowder, J. J. Ricca, A. Gonzales

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N⁺ and N⁺₂. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	652-655
Number of pages	4
Journal	Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B
Volume	56-57
Issue number	PART 1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4
State	Published - May 1 1991
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Nuclear and High Energy Physics
Instrumentation

Access to Document

10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Culbertson, R. J., Burns, F. C., Franzen, W., Lowder, L. J., Ricca, J. J., & Gonzales, A. (1991). Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies. Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B, 56-57(PART 1), 652-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4

@article{f672c13a2347466096b8b6cc44821072,

title = "Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies",

abstract = "The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N+ and N+2. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.",

author = "Culbertson, {R. J.} and Burns, {F. C.} and W. Franzen and Lowder, {L. J.} and Ricca, {J. J.} and A. Gonzales",

year = "1991",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "56-57",

pages = "652--655",

journal = "Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms",

issn = "0168-583X",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies

AU - Culbertson, R. J.

AU - Burns, F. C.

AU - Franzen, W.

AU - Lowder, L. J.

AU - Ricca, J. J.

AU - Gonzales, A.

PY - 1991/5/1

Y1 - 1991/5/1

N2 - The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N+ and N+2. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.

AB - The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N+ and N+2. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000921862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000921862&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4

DO - 10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000921862

VL - 56-57

SP - 652

EP - 655

JO - Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms

JF - Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms

SN - 0168-583X

IS - PART 1

ER -