Abstract
The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N+ and N+ 2. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 652-655 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B |
| Volume | 56-57 |
| Issue number | PART 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 1991 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films
- Instrumentation
- Surfaces and Interfaces
Cite this
Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies. / Culbertson, Robert; Burns, F. C.; Franzen, W.; Lowder, L. J.; Ricca, J. J.; Gonzales, A.
In: Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B, Vol. 56-57, No. PART 1, 01.05.1991, p. 652-655.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance evaluation of ion-implanted cutting tools and dies
AU - Culbertson, Robert
AU - Burns, F. C.
AU - Franzen, W.
AU - Lowder, L. J.
AU - Ricca, J. J.
AU - Gonzales, A.
PY - 1991/5/1
Y1 - 1991/5/1
N2 - The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N+ and N+ 2. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.
AB - The relative performance of ion-implanted and unimplanted machine tool taps, inserts, and punch-die sets was compared using blind tests. Performance of the tools, defined as the number of parts machined to within specifications, was evaluated under actual and simulated production conditions; relative performance was obtained by dividing the average performance of implanted tools by the average performance of unimplanted tools. The tools were implanted with a combination of 80 keV N+ and N+ 2. Implanted high speed steel taps exhibited performance by factors 1.5 to more than 4 as compared to unimplanted taps. Implanted TiN-coated metal cutting carbide inserts exhibited performance from factors of 2-4, and the performance factors of nitrogen-implanted punch-die sets ranged from 2.0 to 2.6.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000921862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000921862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4
DO - 10.1016/0168-583X(91)96117-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000921862
VL - 56-57
SP - 652
EP - 655
JO - Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
JF - Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
SN - 0168-583X
IS - PART 1
ER -