Performance Comparison of R-PHY and R-MACPHY Modular Cable Access Network Architectures

Ziyad Alharbi, Akhilesh S. Thyagaturu, Martin Reisslein, Hesham ElBakoury, Ruobin Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emerging modular cable network architectures distribute some cable headend functions to remote nodes that are located close to the broadcast cable links reaching the cable modems (CMs) in the subscriber homes and businesses. In the remote-PHY (R-PHY) architecture, an R-PHY device conducts the physical layer processing for the analog cable transmissions, while the headend runs the data over cable service interface specification (DOCSIS) medium access control (MAC) for the upstream transmissions of the distributed CMs over the shared cable link. In contrast, in the remote MACPHY (R-MACPHY) architecture, an R-MACPHY device (RMD) conducts both the physical and MAC layer processing. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive performance comparison of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We first develop analytical delay models for the polling-based MAC with gated bandwidth allocation of Poisson traffic in the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We then conduct extensive simulations to assess the accuracy of the analytical model and to evaluate the delay-throughput performance of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures for a wide range of deployment and operating scenarios. Our evaluations include long converged interconnect network (CIN) distances between remote nodes and headend, bursty self-similar traffic, and double-phase polling to mask long CIN propagation distances. We find that for long CIN distances above 100 miles, the R-MACPHY architecture achieves significantly shorter mean upstream packet delays than the R-PHY architecture, especially for bursty traffic. Our extensive comparative R-PHY and R-MACPHY evaluation can serve as a basis for the planning of modular broadcast cable based access networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalIEEE Transactions on Broadcasting
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 27 2017

Fingerprint

Network architecture
Cables
Medium access control
Modems
Frequency allocation
Processing
Masks
Analytical models
Throughput
Specifications
Planning

Keywords

  • Broadcast cable
  • Cable TV
  • Communication cables
  • Computer architecture
  • delay
  • Delays
  • DOCSIS
  • EPON
  • IEEE 802.3 Standard
  • Internet access
  • Media Access Protocol
  • medium access control
  • polling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Media Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Performance Comparison of R-PHY and R-MACPHY Modular Cable Access Network Architectures. / Alharbi, Ziyad; Thyagaturu, Akhilesh S.; Reisslein, Martin; ElBakoury, Hesham; Zheng, Ruobin.

In: IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 27.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c132bb5ae79e4ac180c80314d673d85e,
title = "Performance Comparison of R-PHY and R-MACPHY Modular Cable Access Network Architectures",
abstract = "Emerging modular cable network architectures distribute some cable headend functions to remote nodes that are located close to the broadcast cable links reaching the cable modems (CMs) in the subscriber homes and businesses. In the remote-PHY (R-PHY) architecture, an R-PHY device conducts the physical layer processing for the analog cable transmissions, while the headend runs the data over cable service interface specification (DOCSIS) medium access control (MAC) for the upstream transmissions of the distributed CMs over the shared cable link. In contrast, in the remote MACPHY (R-MACPHY) architecture, an R-MACPHY device (RMD) conducts both the physical and MAC layer processing. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive performance comparison of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We first develop analytical delay models for the polling-based MAC with gated bandwidth allocation of Poisson traffic in the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We then conduct extensive simulations to assess the accuracy of the analytical model and to evaluate the delay-throughput performance of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures for a wide range of deployment and operating scenarios. Our evaluations include long converged interconnect network (CIN) distances between remote nodes and headend, bursty self-similar traffic, and double-phase polling to mask long CIN propagation distances. We find that for long CIN distances above 100 miles, the R-MACPHY architecture achieves significantly shorter mean upstream packet delays than the R-PHY architecture, especially for bursty traffic. Our extensive comparative R-PHY and R-MACPHY evaluation can serve as a basis for the planning of modular broadcast cable based access networks.",
keywords = "Broadcast cable, Cable TV, Communication cables, Computer architecture, delay, Delays, DOCSIS, EPON, IEEE 802.3 Standard, Internet access, Media Access Protocol, medium access control, polling",
author = "Ziyad Alharbi and Thyagaturu, {Akhilesh S.} and Martin Reisslein and Hesham ElBakoury and Ruobin Zheng",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1109/TBC.2017.2711145",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting",
issn = "0018-9316",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance Comparison of R-PHY and R-MACPHY Modular Cable Access Network Architectures

AU - Alharbi, Ziyad

AU - Thyagaturu, Akhilesh S.

AU - Reisslein, Martin

AU - ElBakoury, Hesham

AU - Zheng, Ruobin

PY - 2017/6/27

Y1 - 2017/6/27

N2 - Emerging modular cable network architectures distribute some cable headend functions to remote nodes that are located close to the broadcast cable links reaching the cable modems (CMs) in the subscriber homes and businesses. In the remote-PHY (R-PHY) architecture, an R-PHY device conducts the physical layer processing for the analog cable transmissions, while the headend runs the data over cable service interface specification (DOCSIS) medium access control (MAC) for the upstream transmissions of the distributed CMs over the shared cable link. In contrast, in the remote MACPHY (R-MACPHY) architecture, an R-MACPHY device (RMD) conducts both the physical and MAC layer processing. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive performance comparison of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We first develop analytical delay models for the polling-based MAC with gated bandwidth allocation of Poisson traffic in the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We then conduct extensive simulations to assess the accuracy of the analytical model and to evaluate the delay-throughput performance of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures for a wide range of deployment and operating scenarios. Our evaluations include long converged interconnect network (CIN) distances between remote nodes and headend, bursty self-similar traffic, and double-phase polling to mask long CIN propagation distances. We find that for long CIN distances above 100 miles, the R-MACPHY architecture achieves significantly shorter mean upstream packet delays than the R-PHY architecture, especially for bursty traffic. Our extensive comparative R-PHY and R-MACPHY evaluation can serve as a basis for the planning of modular broadcast cable based access networks.

AB - Emerging modular cable network architectures distribute some cable headend functions to remote nodes that are located close to the broadcast cable links reaching the cable modems (CMs) in the subscriber homes and businesses. In the remote-PHY (R-PHY) architecture, an R-PHY device conducts the physical layer processing for the analog cable transmissions, while the headend runs the data over cable service interface specification (DOCSIS) medium access control (MAC) for the upstream transmissions of the distributed CMs over the shared cable link. In contrast, in the remote MACPHY (R-MACPHY) architecture, an R-MACPHY device (RMD) conducts both the physical and MAC layer processing. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive performance comparison of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We first develop analytical delay models for the polling-based MAC with gated bandwidth allocation of Poisson traffic in the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures. We then conduct extensive simulations to assess the accuracy of the analytical model and to evaluate the delay-throughput performance of the R-PHY and R-MACPHY architectures for a wide range of deployment and operating scenarios. Our evaluations include long converged interconnect network (CIN) distances between remote nodes and headend, bursty self-similar traffic, and double-phase polling to mask long CIN propagation distances. We find that for long CIN distances above 100 miles, the R-MACPHY architecture achieves significantly shorter mean upstream packet delays than the R-PHY architecture, especially for bursty traffic. Our extensive comparative R-PHY and R-MACPHY evaluation can serve as a basis for the planning of modular broadcast cable based access networks.

KW - Broadcast cable

KW - Cable TV

KW - Communication cables

KW - Computer architecture

KW - delay

KW - Delays

KW - DOCSIS

KW - EPON

KW - IEEE 802.3 Standard

KW - Internet access

KW - Media Access Protocol

KW - medium access control

KW - polling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023744851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023744851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TBC.2017.2711145

DO - 10.1109/TBC.2017.2711145

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85023744851

JO - IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting

JF - IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting

SN - 0018-9316

ER -