Performance assessment of three personal cyclone models, using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer

Andrew Maynard, L. C. Kenny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The sampling efficiency of three types of personal cyclone has been experimentally measured at a sampling flow rate of 2.11 min-1. All samplers were based on the original Higgins and Dewell-type cyclone. Samplers were characterised using a polydisperse glass microsphere aerosol contained in a calm air chamber. A modified Aerodynamic Particle Sizer was used to determine the particle size distribution of the aerosol entering and leaving the cyclones. Two of the cyclone types were shown to be statistically identical within experimental errors, when characterised in terms of their d50 points. However, the third type showed a significant deviation in sampling characteristics from the others. It was possible to trace this to a manufacturing error, which has since been rectified. Comparison with previously measured cyclone efficiency curves using similar techniques was good, indicating that characterising aerosols samplers using the APS and polydisperse aerosols is at a stage where experimental errors are not dominated by the instrument, or the aerosol type.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)671-684
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Aerosol Science
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

performance assessment
Aerosols
cyclone
aerodynamics
Aerodynamics
aerosol
sampler
Sampling
sampling
Microspheres
Particle size analysis
Particles (particulate matter)
manufacturing
glass
Flow rate
particle size
particle
Glass
air
Air

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Performance assessment of three personal cyclone models, using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer. / Maynard, Andrew; Kenny, L. C.

In: Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1995, p. 671-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5682745319e94d3abcf30d703b9694f4,
title = "Performance assessment of three personal cyclone models, using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer",
abstract = "The sampling efficiency of three types of personal cyclone has been experimentally measured at a sampling flow rate of 2.11 min-1. All samplers were based on the original Higgins and Dewell-type cyclone. Samplers were characterised using a polydisperse glass microsphere aerosol contained in a calm air chamber. A modified Aerodynamic Particle Sizer was used to determine the particle size distribution of the aerosol entering and leaving the cyclones. Two of the cyclone types were shown to be statistically identical within experimental errors, when characterised in terms of their d50 points. However, the third type showed a significant deviation in sampling characteristics from the others. It was possible to trace this to a manufacturing error, which has since been rectified. Comparison with previously measured cyclone efficiency curves using similar techniques was good, indicating that characterising aerosols samplers using the APS and polydisperse aerosols is at a stage where experimental errors are not dominated by the instrument, or the aerosol type.",
author = "Andrew Maynard and Kenny, {L. C.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0021-8502(94)00131-H",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "671--684",
journal = "Journal of Aerosol Science",
issn = "0021-8502",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance assessment of three personal cyclone models, using an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer

AU - Maynard, Andrew

AU - Kenny, L. C.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The sampling efficiency of three types of personal cyclone has been experimentally measured at a sampling flow rate of 2.11 min-1. All samplers were based on the original Higgins and Dewell-type cyclone. Samplers were characterised using a polydisperse glass microsphere aerosol contained in a calm air chamber. A modified Aerodynamic Particle Sizer was used to determine the particle size distribution of the aerosol entering and leaving the cyclones. Two of the cyclone types were shown to be statistically identical within experimental errors, when characterised in terms of their d50 points. However, the third type showed a significant deviation in sampling characteristics from the others. It was possible to trace this to a manufacturing error, which has since been rectified. Comparison with previously measured cyclone efficiency curves using similar techniques was good, indicating that characterising aerosols samplers using the APS and polydisperse aerosols is at a stage where experimental errors are not dominated by the instrument, or the aerosol type.

AB - The sampling efficiency of three types of personal cyclone has been experimentally measured at a sampling flow rate of 2.11 min-1. All samplers were based on the original Higgins and Dewell-type cyclone. Samplers were characterised using a polydisperse glass microsphere aerosol contained in a calm air chamber. A modified Aerodynamic Particle Sizer was used to determine the particle size distribution of the aerosol entering and leaving the cyclones. Two of the cyclone types were shown to be statistically identical within experimental errors, when characterised in terms of their d50 points. However, the third type showed a significant deviation in sampling characteristics from the others. It was possible to trace this to a manufacturing error, which has since been rectified. Comparison with previously measured cyclone efficiency curves using similar techniques was good, indicating that characterising aerosols samplers using the APS and polydisperse aerosols is at a stage where experimental errors are not dominated by the instrument, or the aerosol type.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000922001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000922001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0021-8502(94)00131-H

DO - 10.1016/0021-8502(94)00131-H

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0000922001

VL - 26

SP - 671

EP - 684

JO - Journal of Aerosol Science

JF - Journal of Aerosol Science

SN - 0021-8502

IS - 4

ER -