Performance analysis of deciduous morphology for detecting biological siblings

Kathleen S. Paul, Christopher Stojanowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Family-centered burial practices influence cemetery structure and can represent social group composition in both modern and ancient contexts. In ancient sites dental phenotypic data are often used as proxies for underlying genotypes to identify potential biological relatives. Here, we test the performance of deciduous dental morphological traits for differentiating sibling pairs from unrelated individuals from the same population. Materials and Methods: We collected 46 deciduous morphological traits for 69 sibling pairs from the Burlington Growth Centre's long term Family Study. Deciduous crown features were recorded following published standards. After variable winnowing, inter-individual Euclidean distances were generated using 20 morphological traits. To determine whether sibling pairs are more phenotypically similar than expected by chance we used bootstrap resampling of distances to generate P values. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots were used to evaluate the degree of clustering among sibling pairs. Results: Results indicate an average distance between siblings of 0.252, which is significantly less than 9,999 replicated averages of 69 resampled pseudo-distances generated from: 1) a sample of non-relative pairs (P <0.001), and 2) a sample of relative and non-relative pairs (P <0.001). MDS plots indicate moderate to strong clustering among siblings; families occupied 3.83% of the multidimensional space on average (versus 63.10% for the total sample). Conclusions: Deciduous crown morphology performed well in identifying related sibling pairs. However, there was considerable variation in the extent to which different families exhibited similarly low levels of phenotypic divergence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-629
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume157
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Siblings
performance
multidimensional scaling
Crowns
Cluster Analysis
Cemeteries
Burial
Deciduous Tooth
Proxy
cemetery
divergence
funeral
Tooth
Genotype
Growth
Population
Values

Keywords

  • biodistance
  • deciduous teeth
  • dental anthropology
  • dental genetics
  • kinship analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Anatomy

Cite this

Performance analysis of deciduous morphology for detecting biological siblings. / Paul, Kathleen S.; Stojanowski, Christopher.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 157, No. 4, 01.08.2015, p. 615-629.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9522e927a5d743269515eb43eddf7c4e,
title = "Performance analysis of deciduous morphology for detecting biological siblings",
abstract = "Objectives: Family-centered burial practices influence cemetery structure and can represent social group composition in both modern and ancient contexts. In ancient sites dental phenotypic data are often used as proxies for underlying genotypes to identify potential biological relatives. Here, we test the performance of deciduous dental morphological traits for differentiating sibling pairs from unrelated individuals from the same population. Materials and Methods: We collected 46 deciduous morphological traits for 69 sibling pairs from the Burlington Growth Centre's long term Family Study. Deciduous crown features were recorded following published standards. After variable winnowing, inter-individual Euclidean distances were generated using 20 morphological traits. To determine whether sibling pairs are more phenotypically similar than expected by chance we used bootstrap resampling of distances to generate P values. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots were used to evaluate the degree of clustering among sibling pairs. Results: Results indicate an average distance between siblings of 0.252, which is significantly less than 9,999 replicated averages of 69 resampled pseudo-distances generated from: 1) a sample of non-relative pairs (P <0.001), and 2) a sample of relative and non-relative pairs (P <0.001). MDS plots indicate moderate to strong clustering among siblings; families occupied 3.83{\%} of the multidimensional space on average (versus 63.10{\%} for the total sample). Conclusions: Deciduous crown morphology performed well in identifying related sibling pairs. However, there was considerable variation in the extent to which different families exhibited similarly low levels of phenotypic divergence.",
keywords = "biodistance, deciduous teeth, dental anthropology, dental genetics, kinship analysis",
author = "Paul, {Kathleen S.} and Christopher Stojanowski",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.22755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "157",
pages = "615--629",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance analysis of deciduous morphology for detecting biological siblings

AU - Paul, Kathleen S.

AU - Stojanowski, Christopher

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Objectives: Family-centered burial practices influence cemetery structure and can represent social group composition in both modern and ancient contexts. In ancient sites dental phenotypic data are often used as proxies for underlying genotypes to identify potential biological relatives. Here, we test the performance of deciduous dental morphological traits for differentiating sibling pairs from unrelated individuals from the same population. Materials and Methods: We collected 46 deciduous morphological traits for 69 sibling pairs from the Burlington Growth Centre's long term Family Study. Deciduous crown features were recorded following published standards. After variable winnowing, inter-individual Euclidean distances were generated using 20 morphological traits. To determine whether sibling pairs are more phenotypically similar than expected by chance we used bootstrap resampling of distances to generate P values. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots were used to evaluate the degree of clustering among sibling pairs. Results: Results indicate an average distance between siblings of 0.252, which is significantly less than 9,999 replicated averages of 69 resampled pseudo-distances generated from: 1) a sample of non-relative pairs (P <0.001), and 2) a sample of relative and non-relative pairs (P <0.001). MDS plots indicate moderate to strong clustering among siblings; families occupied 3.83% of the multidimensional space on average (versus 63.10% for the total sample). Conclusions: Deciduous crown morphology performed well in identifying related sibling pairs. However, there was considerable variation in the extent to which different families exhibited similarly low levels of phenotypic divergence.

AB - Objectives: Family-centered burial practices influence cemetery structure and can represent social group composition in both modern and ancient contexts. In ancient sites dental phenotypic data are often used as proxies for underlying genotypes to identify potential biological relatives. Here, we test the performance of deciduous dental morphological traits for differentiating sibling pairs from unrelated individuals from the same population. Materials and Methods: We collected 46 deciduous morphological traits for 69 sibling pairs from the Burlington Growth Centre's long term Family Study. Deciduous crown features were recorded following published standards. After variable winnowing, inter-individual Euclidean distances were generated using 20 morphological traits. To determine whether sibling pairs are more phenotypically similar than expected by chance we used bootstrap resampling of distances to generate P values. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plots were used to evaluate the degree of clustering among sibling pairs. Results: Results indicate an average distance between siblings of 0.252, which is significantly less than 9,999 replicated averages of 69 resampled pseudo-distances generated from: 1) a sample of non-relative pairs (P <0.001), and 2) a sample of relative and non-relative pairs (P <0.001). MDS plots indicate moderate to strong clustering among siblings; families occupied 3.83% of the multidimensional space on average (versus 63.10% for the total sample). Conclusions: Deciduous crown morphology performed well in identifying related sibling pairs. However, there was considerable variation in the extent to which different families exhibited similarly low levels of phenotypic divergence.

KW - biodistance

KW - deciduous teeth

KW - dental anthropology

KW - dental genetics

KW - kinship analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947019688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947019688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.22755

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.22755

M3 - Article

C2 - 25921791

AN - SCOPUS:84947019688

VL - 157

SP - 615

EP - 629

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 4

ER -