Perceptual selectivity and the fate of unemphasized information in a stimulus complex

Donald Homa, Bruce Coury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The potential role of selectivity in visual perception was investigated for stimuli containing multiple components. Primary interest centered on the role of prior emphasis on the perceptual processing of one component, relative to the perceptual fate of the remaining components in the stimulus, and whether unemphasized components fared less well than those same components on an uninstructed trial. On each trial, a face, scrambled face, or single-component stimulus was briefly presented, followed by a patterned mask and a forced choice test of each of the components teye, nose, mouth). On a cued trial, the subject was instructed to emphasize one component, although all three components were subsequently tested; on an uncued trial, no prior instructions were given. The results indicated that identification of an emphasized stimulus component was enhanced, but only at the detriment of the remaining components; that is, components were perceived more accurately on an uncued trial than unemphasized components on a cued trial. Although face and scrambled face stimuli were perceived unequally, the effectiveness of prior instructions was equivalent. Surprisingly, the overall identifiability of the components within a stimulus was independent of prior instructions, and suggested that a finite capacity is available for perceptual analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-354
Number of pages8
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume5
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1977

Fingerprint

Visual Perception
Masks
Nose
Mouth
Fate
Stimulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Perceptual selectivity and the fate of unemphasized information in a stimulus complex. / Homa, Donald; Coury, Bruce.

In: Memory & Cognition, Vol. 5, No. 3, 05.1977, p. 347-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Homa, Donald ; Coury, Bruce. / Perceptual selectivity and the fate of unemphasized information in a stimulus complex. In: Memory & Cognition. 1977 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 347-354.
@article{08ce204cb62e4647a111c3a84789cb47,
title = "Perceptual selectivity and the fate of unemphasized information in a stimulus complex",
abstract = "The potential role of selectivity in visual perception was investigated for stimuli containing multiple components. Primary interest centered on the role of prior emphasis on the perceptual processing of one component, relative to the perceptual fate of the remaining components in the stimulus, and whether unemphasized components fared less well than those same components on an uninstructed trial. On each trial, a face, scrambled face, or single-component stimulus was briefly presented, followed by a patterned mask and a forced choice test of each of the components teye, nose, mouth). On a cued trial, the subject was instructed to emphasize one component, although all three components were subsequently tested; on an uncued trial, no prior instructions were given. The results indicated that identification of an emphasized stimulus component was enhanced, but only at the detriment of the remaining components; that is, components were perceived more accurately on an uncued trial than unemphasized components on a cued trial. Although face and scrambled face stimuli were perceived unequally, the effectiveness of prior instructions was equivalent. Surprisingly, the overall identifiability of the components within a stimulus was independent of prior instructions, and suggested that a finite capacity is available for perceptual analysis.",
author = "Donald Homa and Bruce Coury",
year = "1977",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3758/BF03197582",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "347--354",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptual selectivity and the fate of unemphasized information in a stimulus complex

AU - Homa, Donald

AU - Coury, Bruce

PY - 1977/5

Y1 - 1977/5

N2 - The potential role of selectivity in visual perception was investigated for stimuli containing multiple components. Primary interest centered on the role of prior emphasis on the perceptual processing of one component, relative to the perceptual fate of the remaining components in the stimulus, and whether unemphasized components fared less well than those same components on an uninstructed trial. On each trial, a face, scrambled face, or single-component stimulus was briefly presented, followed by a patterned mask and a forced choice test of each of the components teye, nose, mouth). On a cued trial, the subject was instructed to emphasize one component, although all three components were subsequently tested; on an uncued trial, no prior instructions were given. The results indicated that identification of an emphasized stimulus component was enhanced, but only at the detriment of the remaining components; that is, components were perceived more accurately on an uncued trial than unemphasized components on a cued trial. Although face and scrambled face stimuli were perceived unequally, the effectiveness of prior instructions was equivalent. Surprisingly, the overall identifiability of the components within a stimulus was independent of prior instructions, and suggested that a finite capacity is available for perceptual analysis.

AB - The potential role of selectivity in visual perception was investigated for stimuli containing multiple components. Primary interest centered on the role of prior emphasis on the perceptual processing of one component, relative to the perceptual fate of the remaining components in the stimulus, and whether unemphasized components fared less well than those same components on an uninstructed trial. On each trial, a face, scrambled face, or single-component stimulus was briefly presented, followed by a patterned mask and a forced choice test of each of the components teye, nose, mouth). On a cued trial, the subject was instructed to emphasize one component, although all three components were subsequently tested; on an uncued trial, no prior instructions were given. The results indicated that identification of an emphasized stimulus component was enhanced, but only at the detriment of the remaining components; that is, components were perceived more accurately on an uncued trial than unemphasized components on a cued trial. Although face and scrambled face stimuli were perceived unequally, the effectiveness of prior instructions was equivalent. Surprisingly, the overall identifiability of the components within a stimulus was independent of prior instructions, and suggested that a finite capacity is available for perceptual analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017397760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017397760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03197582

DO - 10.3758/BF03197582

M3 - Article

C2 - 24202906

AN - SCOPUS:0017397760

VL - 5

SP - 347

EP - 354

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 3

ER -